PLAN is now a peer competitor USN admits

[jhungary]

Pettis isn't worth reading. He already claimed that China would have 2-4% growth this decade at best, and he's losing a bet with The Economist at present. BTW in China-watcher parlance and to Pettis himself a hard landing would be 2-3% growth. "Falling" from double digit growth when in fact China has growing faster in absolute terms AND relative to competitors is a psychological trick. If you're into psychological tricks then the PPP overhaul is a much bigger one.

Your "explanations" are pretty wild. Do you really think dollars change hands when China pens a $400 billion deal with Russia? So much for the 8% figure. That's all I'm going to say to you, but feel free to touch yourself to ideas of the West being superior.

The AIIB isn't necessarily part of a broader strategy to undermine the dollar. But like I said, it and other moves by the Chinese government could potentially be. Mostly I'm irritated by your claims to be an expert on military, diplomatic, economic and financial affairs when it's clear you're a novice.

all I see is hot air, again, if you have some solid point to challenge Michael Pettis point nor my explanation of why AIIB would not work against, even work in favour of USD, all I see is, yeah, he predict something, and that did not came true, therefore, he must be a fraud. lol, I saw a lot of people here saying China won't buy S-400, won't buy US Engine for domestic C-919, and yet all these does not came true, so should I say all Chinese member, including yourselves are not reliable??

And yes, there would be no change hand if a deal between China and Russia to USD and I do included in my essay detailed why AIIB does not work, currently there are 7 country that signed the currency linkage deal with China, but then if you look at that 7 country, lol, but what that 7 countries combine for? less than 10 trillions dollars. And Japan, the topdog of all, is not yet signed into AIIB, so you have what? a 5 trillion dollar that have direct linkage, while the other estimated 45 trillions economy, don't, and tell me how that affect the USD conversion.

Again, while you said debate the man's point merit, you go after the man yourselves, isn't that ironic??

If you have solid challenge to Michael Pettis point or my explanation, but not (He said something that did not see in the end), then yeah, go ahead, otherwise I have no time to debate the guy himself, or what you think about me. I did not claim to be a Military Expert, I served in the Army, I did not claim to be an Economic Expert, i have a Master Degree in International Business, i did not claim to be a political expert, i have a Bachelor degree in International politic. but then I will always be a novice here talking to Chinese member, and I know why, I am a Chinese too. lol

好容易啫，唔夠人講就扁低人囉，亞水都識啦！！

if you have any doubt about Michael Pettis, wrote a letter to Peking University and ask for him to be fired. Or rang up Peking University for all I care, you live in China right?

 

[TheTruth]

And yes, there would be no change hand if a deal between China and Russia to USD and I do included in my essay detailed why AIIB does not work, currently there are 7 country that signed the currency linkage deal with China, but then if you look at that 7 country, lol, but what that 7 countries combine for? less than 10 trillions dollars. And Japan, the topdog of all, is not yet signed into AIIB, so you have what? a 5 trillion dollar that have direct linkage, while the other estimated 45 trillions economy, don't, and tell me how that affect the USD conversion.

Wow, and I bet you don't even realize all of this is complete nonsense.

i have a Master Degree in International Business, i did not claim to be a political expert, i have a Bachelor degree in International politic

You clearly failed both programs. IB is not Economics, nor is it Finance.