PLAN is now a peer competitor USN admits

[jhungary]

Dude, you are so retarded. Don't you think I can look up the Spanish meaning as well?

Anyway, in my prvious post I said something about the Arabs and thier skills. Well guess what, the US has more skills up their sleeves. They can make a dead boy alive again ... well, just to get him shot dead a few 1000 miles away by the Taliban.

that said, beside calling me a retard, judging from the stance you takes and still telling me Petard have the same meaning as Petardo, you still don't know what is the meaning of Petardo, right?

It's no shame to admit something you don't know, you don't speak Spanish, nobody will blame you

Gary,

You just went 'whoooooooooooshhhhh' over their heads, buddy. Now the Chinese are going to do to you what they did to me when I went 'whoooooooooooshhhhh' over their heads on the technical front -- personal attacks.

check out post #45 buddy.

Ignorant one say Michael Pettis is an quote "ignoramus" end qquote ho, ironically, taught in Peking University and have 2 Master Degree, one is a MBA with Columbia, and another one is Master in International Affair again with Columbia.

Maybe that poster think his own calibre is a lot better than a professor have 2 Master and is currently teaching in Peking University, one of the top prestigious and Premier university in Mainland China, and say that the guy himself don't know the different between pegged currency and currency swap.

Maybe they are all PhD? but then I seriously doubt they even went to any sort of University as their critical thinking skill is obliviously lacking, lol But then only them, those who say this would claim a PhD in Computer Science is an Aviation Expert lol.

Just look at their comment and laugh a little, it help to reduce constipation.

 

[AndrewJin]

You see, at best that jhungary guy is a government shill coming here to spread silly propaganda (doing a bad job due to lack of intelligence), at worst he is just a scared shitless patsy (you understand why he needs to go to the toilet) who is afraid that this or worse might happen to him:

Watch this and you'll understand.

And the best he can do, when he runs out of argument is to give me a negative rating. Practically all my negative ratings are from him. Go figure.

@Hu Songshan, is it ok that people like jhungary abuse their negative rating ability?
____________________________________________________________


If you guys want to know what laws the US Patriot Act was modeled on?

Here it is: Criminal Code of the RSFSR

Flinders Academic Commons: The USA PATRIOT Acts (et al): Collective Amnesia, Paranoia and Convergent, Oligarchic Legislation in the ‘Politics of Fear’
A cursory, comparative glance at The USA PATRIOT Act 2001, The USA PATRIOT Act 2006, other legislative variations in the United Kingdom/European Union (UK/EU) and Australia, and Stalinist legislation - Article 58, Criminal Code of the RSFSR (1934) - provides uncomfortable reading and an interesting convergence in the use/abuse of the ‘politics of fear’.

Your negative ratings are glorious, not shameful at all.

 

[Götterdämmerung]

Your negative ratings are glorious, not shameful at all.

I do, but abuse should not be tolerated and condemned.

 

[jhungary]

Oh, I forgot that one of your other identity is also Swedish. Go ahead and talk about Gustav and his German wife, Sylvia. You can also talk about this hot daughter Madeleine.

That post in itself show you have knowledge equate to a garbage can about Swedish Royalty

Did I specify King Carl Gustav XVI??

King Gustav usually mean KGV (King Gustav V) in Swedish society, if I said King Gustavus, then it is referred to KGII, the moment you assume King Gustav is the current king mean you have no knowledge of Swedish History. So you want to talk more about Swedish Royal??

but then this is off topic, meh, just so you know

 

[Götterdämmerung]

That post in itself show you have knowledge equate to a garbage can about Swedish Royalty

Did I specify King Carl Gustav XVI??

King Gustav usually mean KGV (King Gustav V) in Swedish society, if I said King Gustavus, then it is referred to KGII, the moment you assume King Gustav is the current king mean you have no knowledge of Swedish History. So you want to talk more about Swedish Royal??

but then this is off topic, meh, just so you know

When we call King Gustav, we normally mean the living and ruling king, not some past kings. It's common sense that you lack. Google King Gustav and you get tons of pics and news about the current king Gustav.

Yeah, run, Lola run! Do your job, shill, or you might encounter what happened to Susan Lindauer.

 

[jhungary]

When we call King Gustav, we normally mean the living and ruling king, not some past kings. It's common sense that you lack. Google King Gustav and you get tons of pics and news about the current king Gustav.

Yeah, run, Lola run!

Dude, the current king is NOT EXACTLY just Gustav, WE SWEDE referred the current king as CARL GUSTAV, and lol at google, google is an American search engine, if you want to try, try yahoo sverige! LOL fail

 

[Götterdämmerung]

Dude, the current king is NOT EXACTLY just Gustav, WE SWEDE referred the current king as CARL GUSTAV, and lol at google, google is an American search engine, if you want to try, try yahoo sverige! LOL fail

You are in an intentional forum, not a Swedish one, nobody (indeed) cares about tiny negligible Sweden. Outside Sweden, we call the current Swedish king Gustav.

 

[TheTruth]

Ignorant one say Michael Pettis is an quote "ignoramus" end qquote ho, ironically, taught in Peking University and have 2 Master Degree, one is a MBA with Columbia, and another one is Master in International Affair again with Columbia.

Maybe that poster think his own calibre is a lot better than a professor have 2 Master and is currently teaching in Peking University, one of the top prestigious and Premier university in Mainland China, and say that the guy himself don't know the different between pegged currency and currency swap.

Maybe they are all PhD? but then I seriously doubt they even went to any sort of University as their critical thinking skill is obliviously lacking, lol But then only them, those who say this would claim a PhD in Computer Science is an Aviation Expert lol.

Just look at their comment and laugh a little, it help to reduce constipation.

So this is a degree battle, now? I can come up with a list of billionaires, Harvard degree holders, child prodigies and infomercial celebrities that disagree with him.

A proper response would have referred to the merits of Pettis' arguments.

 

[jhungary]

So this is a degree battle, now? I can come up with a list of billionaires, Harvard degree holders, child prodigies and infomercial celebrities that disagree with him.

A proper response would have referred to the merits of Pettis' arguments.

lol tell that to Peking university, he taught there

It's not about his degree, it's about his reputation, you can quote anyone who may or may not qualify on said topic, but did whom you quote have the same reputation over Michael Pettis??I am pretty sure if I were to put out a degree battle, I will post comment from PhD or multiple PhD instead of a double Master.

Do bear in mind he taught in university, which is one of two top University in China, so he will turn over a generation of Chinese Economist to serve China, so to be able to taught there, you have to have some kind of reputation, which people, mostly academia, have to see your reputation to get hired as a fellow.

as for the merit of his argument?? You have to come up with the merit of the challenge to comment on the merit of the Pettis's argument, so far I see nothing of a solid challenge, only people saying he is another Gordon Chan and he don't know currency pegging and currency swap, which to be fair, is not count as a valid challenge to Pettis argument.

 

[TheTruth]

lol tell that to Peking university, he taught there

It's not about his degree, it's about his reputation, you can quote anyone who may or may not qualify on said topic, but did whom you quote have the same reputation over Michael Pettis??I am pretty sure if I were to put out a degree battle, I will post comment from PhD or multiple PhD instead of a double Master.

Do bear in mind he taught in university, which is one of two top University in China, so he will turn over a generation of Chinese Economist to serve China, so to be able to taught there, you have to have some kind of reputation, which people, mostly academia, have to see your reputation to get hired as a fellow.

as for the merit of his argument?? You have to come up with the merit of the challenge to comment on the merit of the Pettis's argument, so far I see nothing of a solid challenge, only people saying he is another Gordon Chan and he don't know currency pegging and currency swap, which to be fair, is not count as a valid challenge to Pettis argument.

Nothing you said matters. Lots of people disagree with Pettis on a lot of things, he's not the only "famous" or "reputable" economist out there. His being hired at a "top university in China" is also meaningless, these positions are as much about politics as anything.

The fact of the matter is he already predicted a "hard landing" for China almost a decade ago. Did that happen?

 

[jhungary]

Nothing you said matters. Lots of people disagree with Pettis on a lot of things, he's not the only "famous" or "reputable" economist out there. His being hired at a "top university in China" is also meaningless, these positions are as much about politics as anything.

The fact of the matter is he already predicted a "hard landing" for China almost a decade ago. Did that happen?

so, I still yet to see or hear any SOLID point about how wrong Michael Pettis was, all I hear is since Pettis said AIIB is indeed no challenge to the USD global currency status, he must be wrong.

You do realise that you need a creditable challenge to challenge how "Creditable" his argument

And indeed, China did suffer a hard landing in 2008, yes, it bounced back earlier than the other, but still, a hard landing is a hard landing

China 2008: The Global Financial Crisis - China Digital Times (CDT)

 

[TheTruth]

so, I still yet to see or hear any SOLID point about how wrong Michael Pettis was, all I hear is since Pettis said AIIB is indeed no challenge to the USD global currency status, he must be wrong.

You do realise that you need a creditable challenge to challenge how "Creditable" his argument

And indeed, China did suffer a hard landing in 2008, yes, it bounced back earlier than the other, but still, a hard landing is a hard landing

China 2008: The Global Financial Crisis - China Digital Times (CDT)

No, it didn't. "Hard landing" has a band of growth set as part of the definition. It's not whatever you want it to be for the moment.

The AIIB can potentially be used as to alter the system, but that's up to China.

 

[jhungary]

No, it didn't. "Hard landing" has a band of growth set as part of the definition. It's not whatever you want it to be for the moment.

The AIIB can potentially be used as to alter the system, but that's up to China.

dude, you can be an ostrich and "define" any term as you seems fits, but truth is truth, the Chinese economic growth was taken a big sap out of the double digit, you can say it is not a hard landing, that does not mean it wasn't.

and LOL, again, believe the AIIB can do whatever all you want, I have already explained why it wouldn't, and it would not do what you said simply because you want it to happen.

You are funny, on one side you asked to discuss "merit" of Pettis argument, but on the other hand, all you give is an unsupported argument yourselves, a mere interpretation you want to believe.

 

[TheTruth]

dude, you can be an ostrich and "define" any term as you seems fits, but truth is truth, the Chinese economic growth was taken a big sap out of the double digit, you can say it is not a hard landing, that does not mean it wasn't.

Pettis isn't worth reading. He already claimed that China would have 2-4% growth this decade at best, and he's losing a bet with The Economist at present. BTW in China-watcher parlance and to Pettis himself a hard landing would be 2-3% growth. "Falling" from double digit growth when in fact China has growing faster in absolute terms AND relative to competitors is a psychological trick. If you're into psychological tricks then the PPP overhaul is a much bigger one.

Your "explanations" are pretty wild. Do you really think dollars change hands when China pens a $400 billion deal with Russia? So much for the 8% figure. That's all I'm going to say to you, but feel free to touch yourself to ideas of the West being superior.

The AIIB isn't necessarily part of a broader strategy to undermine the dollar. But like I said, it and other moves by the Chinese government could potentially be. Mostly I'm irritated by your claims to be an expert on military, diplomatic, economic and financial affairs when it's clear you're a novice.

 

[Keel]

I think you guys are arguing with the most pretentious "professional" ignoramus and one of the most Chinese haters in the forum ever has who doesnt have a clue between "pegged currency" and " currency swap" and using M P - another G Chang class Chinese economic prophet as his (one of the two ignoramus') shield for argument

And even towards the understanding the gist of the above statement he failed miserably

Jingdezhen porcelain vase