What's new

PLAN is now a peer competitor USN admits

SelfServeFive

BANNED
Feb 7, 2015
227
-3
299
Country
China
Location
China
ONI Reveals Massive Chinese Naval Buildup
New supersonic cruise missile deployed


Luyang III destroyer / ONI


BY: Bill Gertz Follow @BillGertz
April 10, 2015 1:01 pm


China has deployed a new high-speed anti-ship cruise missile and is sharply expanding an armada of advanced guided-missile warships and submarines, according to a naval intelligence report made public Thursday.

The Office of Naval Intelligence, in its first unclassified assessment of the Chinese navy in six years, revealed deployment of the new YJ-18 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile on warships and submarines that analysts say poses a major threat to U.S. and allied vessels.

China’s current naval force of 300 surface ships, submarines, amphibious ships, and missile-armed patrol craft is rapidly expanding, the report says.

According to the report, China began building or launched more than 60 naval ships and vessels last year, and a similar number of warships are under construction or deployed for 2015.

“Major qualitative improvements are occurring within naval aviation and the submarine force, which are increasingly capable of striking targets hundreds of miles from the Chinese mainland,” the report said, adding that despite some shortfalls, “it is emerging as a well equipped and competent force.”

The key focus of the Chinese navy is anti-surface ship warfare through deployment of large numbers of advanced destroyers, frigates, and submarines, supported by long-range range over the horizon radar.

The new YJ-18 cruise missile is deployed on the newest class of destroyer called the Luyang III, and on diesel attack submarines known as the Song/Yuan class, and nuclear-powered Shang-class attack submarines.


YJ-18

Andrew Erickson, a Naval War College professor, said the YJ-18 poses a significant threat.

“This supersonic missile could be extremely difficult for U.S. and allied ships to defend against,” Erickson said.

The YJ-18 reportedly has a maximum range of 111 miles at a speed of Mach .08 and a higher speed range of 24 miles. The new missile is more capable and has a longer range than the current anti-ship cruise missile arsenal.

Additionally, the report reveals that China’s coast guard now has more ships and vessels than the combined coast guard forces of countries in the region.

It was the first time the U.S. government has acknowledged China’s deployment of the supersonic missile, which appears based on the Russian SSN-27/Klub cruise missile.

The report also says deployment of DF-21D long-range anti-ship ballistic missiles will expand the attack range of the Chinese military “further into the Philippine and South China Seas.”


DF-21D / ONI

The report notes China is using its newly expanded naval power in maritime disputes throughout the region, including the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea.

“Against this back drop of increasing military capability, China’s leaders appear increasingly willing to assert China’s maritime claims, even when such actions risk exacerbating tension with China’s neighbors,” the report said.

China has clashed with Vietnam, Philippines, and Japan over maritime claims to islands in the South China and East China Seas.


Further escalating tensions, the Chinese have reclaimed “hundreds of acres” of land last year as part of a buildup of naval and maritime law enforcement operations in the South China Sea’s Spratly islands.

“Together with cutting-edge Second Artillery Force [missile] developments and South China Sea island building, this raises a serious risk for the U.S. and its allies,” Erickson said.

“If China envelops a disputed feature such as Second Thomas Shoal in a ‘Cabbage Strategy’ with nonmilitary Chinese personnel facing foreign forces—backed by some of the world’s most potent ballistic and cruise missiles—how will America respond? Washington needs an answer soon, or it will risk major erosion of its interests and those of its allies.”

China’s submarine force also has expanded rapidly. Currently, China has deployed 59 diesel submarines and nine nuclear power submarines, and ONI estimates the numbers will increase to 63 and 11 respectively by 2020.

“China’s newest indigenous submarine-launched [anti-ship cruise missile], the YJ-18, extends a similar capability to the SONG, YUAN, and SHANG classes,” the report said. “Previously, China’s only indigenous sub-launched ASCM was the YJ-82, which has a much shorter range.”

The report also reveals that China has now deployed four Jin-class nuclear missile submarines that are expected to begin operational deployments this year.

Adm. William Gortney, commander of the U.S. Northern Command, said earlier this week that China’s has three missile submarines in the water that are a “concern.”

The sea deployments of the submarines, armed with JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles, “will mark China’s first credible at-sea second-strike nuclear capability,” the report said.

“The JIN-class nuclear ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) is poised to begin strategic patrols in the near future, for the first time, putting Chinese intercontinental range ballistic missiles to sea,” the report said.

“At the same time, with the commissioning of the Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier Liaoning China has taken the first step as a carrier-capable navy.”

The report contradicts a key theme of U.S. intelligence analysts for the past 15 years, namely that China’s military was defensive and focused mainly on preparing for a conflict with Taiwan.


Source: ONI

The new report says China’s naval buildup is for operations far beyond Chinese shores, including sea-lane security and other power projection.

“Over the long term, Beijing aspires to sustain naval missions far from China’s shores,” the ONI report said.

Among the naval operations showing the expanded reach were the Chinese navy’s combat training in the Philippine Sea, training missions in the Mediterranean, and increased intelligence ship deployments in the western Pacific. Last year, for the first time a Chinese submarine was deployed to Indian Ocean.


Rick Fisher, a Chinese military affairs expert, said the YJ-18 is also likely to be deployed in land-based and aircraft-launched versions.

“This is a quite informative but fair assessment of the current and near term prospects for China’s naval power,” Fisher said of the report, noting that ONI provides more details than congressionally mandated Pentagon reports on the Chinese military.

“Its identification of the Navy [Communist] Party Standing Committee is a significant contribution to our understanding of the PLA,” he said.

The committee is the Party organ that makes decisions for the navy and the report notes that China’s military is a “party army” not a traditional national defense force as other nations have.

“This is a crucial point,” Fisher said. “It means that 35 years of effort by successive U.S. administrations to engage the PLA has been to a major degree misdirected. There must now be a major push by all U.S. agencies charged with ‘engaging; China to focus on the Party.”

Other key disclosures in the report include:

  • The NATO code name for China’s J-10 fighter, the “Firebird”
  • China’s navy will likely emerge as “one of China’s most prolific [unmanned aerial vehicle] users”
  • The Chinese navy has 50,000 mines
  • China will likely conduct warship deployment to the central and eastern Pacific in the next five years.
  • The PLA Navy made “sporadic” progress as integrated joint-war fighting capabilities
The report concludes that China’s naval build up of aircraft carriers, ballistic missile submarines, and potentially large-deck amphibious ships is altering how the PLA navy operates and “is viewed by the world.”

“Here, ONI is suggesting what to some non-government analysts is obvious: China is building its naval forces for eventual global power projection,” Fisher said.

“ONI is now suggesting, as others have already, that China could soon be projecting naval power in the same manner as the U.S. Navy,” he said. “The Washington policy community has not yet started to understand, much less respond to this level of strategic challenge.”

ONI Reveals Massive Chinese Naval Buildup | Washington Free Beacon
 
ONI Reveals Massive Chinese Naval Buildup
New supersonic cruise missile deployed


Luyang III destroyer / ONI


BY: Bill Gertz Follow @BillGertz
April 10, 2015 1:01 pm


China has deployed a new high-speed anti-ship cruise missile and is sharply expanding an armada of advanced guided-missile warships and submarines, according to a naval intelligence report made public Thursday.

The Office of Naval Intelligence, in its first unclassified assessment of the Chinese navy in six years, revealed deployment of the new YJ-18 supersonic anti-ship cruise missile on warships and submarines that analysts say poses a major threat to U.S. and allied vessels.

China’s current naval force of 300 surface ships, submarines, amphibious ships, and missile-armed patrol craft is rapidly expanding, the report says.

According to the report, China began building or launched more than 60 naval ships and vessels last year, and a similar number of warships are under construction or deployed for 2015.

“Major qualitative improvements are occurring within naval aviation and the submarine force, which are increasingly capable of striking targets hundreds of miles from the Chinese mainland,” the report said, adding that despite some shortfalls, “it is emerging as a well equipped and competent force.”

The key focus of the Chinese navy is anti-surface ship warfare through deployment of large numbers of advanced destroyers, frigates, and submarines, supported by long-range range over the horizon radar.

The new YJ-18 cruise missile is deployed on the newest class of destroyer called the Luyang III, and on diesel attack submarines known as the Song/Yuan class, and nuclear-powered Shang-class attack submarines.


YJ-18

Andrew Erickson, a Naval War College professor, said the YJ-18 poses a significant threat.

“This supersonic missile could be extremely difficult for U.S. and allied ships to defend against,” Erickson said.

The YJ-18 reportedly has a maximum range of 111 miles at a speed of Mach .08 and a higher speed range of 24 miles. The new missile is more capable and has a longer range than the current anti-ship cruise missile arsenal.

Additionally, the report reveals that China’s coast guard now has more ships and vessels than the combined coast guard forces of countries in the region.

It was the first time the U.S. government has acknowledged China’s deployment of the supersonic missile, which appears based on the Russian SSN-27/Klub cruise missile.

The report also says deployment of DF-21D long-range anti-ship ballistic missiles will expand the attack range of the Chinese military “further into the Philippine and South China Seas.”


DF-21D / ONI

The report notes China is using its newly expanded naval power in maritime disputes throughout the region, including the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea.

“Against this back drop of increasing military capability, China’s leaders appear increasingly willing to assert China’s maritime claims, even when such actions risk exacerbating tension with China’s neighbors,” the report said.

China has clashed with Vietnam, Philippines, and Japan over maritime claims to islands in the South China and East China Seas.


Further escalating tensions, the Chinese have reclaimed “hundreds of acres” of land last year as part of a buildup of naval and maritime law enforcement operations in the South China Sea’s Spratly islands.

“Together with cutting-edge Second Artillery Force [missile] developments and South China Sea island building, this raises a serious risk for the U.S. and its allies,” Erickson said.

“If China envelops a disputed feature such as Second Thomas Shoal in a ‘Cabbage Strategy’ with nonmilitary Chinese personnel facing foreign forces—backed by some of the world’s most potent ballistic and cruise missiles—how will America respond? Washington needs an answer soon, or it will risk major erosion of its interests and those of its allies.”

China’s submarine force also has expanded rapidly. Currently, China has deployed 59 diesel submarines and nine nuclear power submarines, and ONI estimates the numbers will increase to 63 and 11 respectively by 2020.

“China’s newest indigenous submarine-launched [anti-ship cruise missile], the YJ-18, extends a similar capability to the SONG, YUAN, and SHANG classes,” the report said. “Previously, China’s only indigenous sub-launched ASCM was the YJ-82, which has a much shorter range.”

The report also reveals that China has now deployed four Jin-class nuclear missile submarines that are expected to begin operational deployments this year.

Adm. William Gortney, commander of the U.S. Northern Command, said earlier this week that China’s has three missile submarines in the water that are a “concern.”

The sea deployments of the submarines, armed with JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles, “will mark China’s first credible at-sea second-strike nuclear capability,” the report said.

“The JIN-class nuclear ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) is poised to begin strategic patrols in the near future, for the first time, putting Chinese intercontinental range ballistic missiles to sea,” the report said.

“At the same time, with the commissioning of the Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier Liaoning China has taken the first step as a carrier-capable navy.”

The report contradicts a key theme of U.S. intelligence analysts for the past 15 years, namely that China’s military was defensive and focused mainly on preparing for a conflict with Taiwan.


Source: ONI

The new report says China’s naval buildup is for operations far beyond Chinese shores, including sea-lane security and other power projection.

“Over the long term, Beijing aspires to sustain naval missions far from China’s shores,” the ONI report said.

Among the naval operations showing the expanded reach were the Chinese navy’s combat training in the Philippine Sea, training missions in the Mediterranean, and increased intelligence ship deployments in the western Pacific. Last year, for the first time a Chinese submarine was deployed to Indian Ocean.


Rick Fisher, a Chinese military affairs expert, said the YJ-18 is also likely to be deployed in land-based and aircraft-launched versions.

“This is a quite informative but fair assessment of the current and near term prospects for China’s naval power,” Fisher said of the report, noting that ONI provides more details than congressionally mandated Pentagon reports on the Chinese military.

“Its identification of the Navy [Communist] Party Standing Committee is a significant contribution to our understanding of the PLA,” he said.

The committee is the Party organ that makes decisions for the navy and the report notes that China’s military is a “party army” not a traditional national defense force as other nations have.

“This is a crucial point,” Fisher said. “It means that 35 years of effort by successive U.S. administrations to engage the PLA has been to a major degree misdirected. There must now be a major push by all U.S. agencies charged with ‘engaging; China to focus on the Party.”

Other key disclosures in the report include:

  • The NATO code name for China’s J-10 fighter, the “Firebird”
  • China’s navy will likely emerge as “one of China’s most prolific [unmanned aerial vehicle] users”
  • The Chinese navy has 50,000 mines
  • China will likely conduct warship deployment to the central and eastern Pacific in the next five years.
  • The PLA Navy made “sporadic” progress as integrated joint-war fighting capabilities
The report concludes that China’s naval build up of aircraft carriers, ballistic missile submarines, and potentially large-deck amphibious ships is altering how the PLA navy operates and “is viewed by the world.”

“Here, ONI is suggesting what to some non-government analysts is obvious: China is building its naval forces for eventual global power projection,” Fisher said.

“ONI is now suggesting, as others have already, that China could soon be projecting naval power in the same manner as the U.S. Navy,” he said. “The Washington policy community has not yet started to understand, much less respond to this level of strategic challenge.”

ONI Reveals Massive Chinese Naval Buildup | Washington Free Beacon
The speed will make sure USA soon have night mares
 
lol, depends on how do you define the word "Peer"

Russian Navy is a "Peer" with USN, British RN is a "Peer" with USN, the word peer would used so they said their capability are comparable. Capability means they can do what USN do, but not into what degree and how well they can do it, when compare to the USN. The word "Peer" is a very carefully selected word so that it appear to mean something, but in a sense, don't.

The problem is, would any peer can challenge US Naval Dominance over the next 50 years?? No. In fact, until the day US stop progressing forward, there are no way any country in this world can overshot the USN, simply because USN have been evolve into one big giant grinding machines over the year that, even if we put the next 10 Naval power, it will still behind a combine force of USN, USMC and USCG put together. And that is a long way to catch and the gap can be close but can never be caught unless USN stop developing, which is basically, impossible.
 
lol, depends on how do you define the word "Peer"

Russian Navy is a "Peer" with USN, British RN is a "Peer" with USN, the word peer would used so they said their capability are comparable. Capability means they can do what USN do, but not into what degree and how well they can do it, when compare to the USN. The word "Peer" is a very carefully selected word so that it appear to mean something, but in a sense, don't.

The problem is, would any peer can challenge US Naval Dominance over the next 50 years?? No. In fact, until the day US stop progressing forward, there are no way any country in this world can overshot the USN, simply because USN have been evolve into one big giant grinding machines over the year that, even if we put the next 10 Naval power, it will still behind a combine force of USN, USMC and USCG put together. And that is a long way to catch and the gap can be close but can never be caught unless USN stop developing, which is basically, impossible.
You know what sunk the Imperial Grand Navy? It wasn't cannons or missiles but the fall of the Pound Sterling.

Once China asserts our domination in East Asia by taking back Taiwan between 2020 and 2025, the fall of the US dollar will see USN sold for scrap metal.
 
You know what sunk the Imperial Grand Navy? It wasn't cannons or missiles but the fall of the Pound Sterling.

Once China asserts our domination in East Asia by taking back Taiwan between 2020 and 2025, the fall of the US dollar will see USN sold for scrap metal.

Well, there were no missile when they polished off the Imperial Navy (By the way, the US defeated them in 1812 long before their short fall in 1890s)

and lol, you do know if US dollar fall, Yuan would go down the toilet too, right?? Or you seriously suggested that China can make up the 70% different in world trade currency usage in just 10 years?? China can't do it with 20 years of prime double digit growth starting in 1990, what make you think China can bring down the US dollar with stretched out growth of 6 to 7% in the next 10?? Set aside it would be more or less financial suicide to kill US dollars in the next 10 years lol

May I suggest some reading material from world history and finance before you go on another rampage comment??


lol, that was a typical "I want budget, gimme" article penned by our Joint Chief of Staff, when they needed money, they write this kind of article on "Insert Threat Here" rise to scare senate and congress off so they can get some. nothing new about whoever being peer.

On the other hand, I would be surprise if the US Navy does not treat PLAN as a peer, then either those navy brass were a bunch of idiot or they real do think PLAN is not a threat at all...

EDIT :: I misread that Other currency as RMB % of trade. As it stand in 2014, RMB have world share of 8.66% of world trade, while US Currency have 81.6% world trade. so the different is instead of 55%, it was 70% as of 2014

Yuan Passes Euro as 2nd-Most Used Trade-Finance Currency - Bloomberg Business
 
Last edited:
Well, there were no missile when they polished off the Imperial Navy (By the way, the US defeated them in 1812 long before their short fall in 1890s)

and lol, you do know if US dollar fall, Yuan would go down the toilet too, right?? Or you seriously suggested that China can make up the 55% different in world trade currency usage in just 10 years?? China can't do it with 20 years of prime double digit growth starting in 1990, what make you think China can bring down the US dollar with stretched out growth of 6 to 7% in the next 10?? Set aside it would be more or less financial suicide to kill US dollars in the next 10 years lol

May I suggest some reading material from world history and finance before you go on another rampage comment??



lol, that was a typical "I want budget, gimme" article penned by our Joint Chief of Staff, when they needed money, they write this kind of article on "Insert Threat Here" rise to scare senate and congress off so they can get some. nothing new about whoever being peer.

On the other hand, I would be surprise if the US Navy does not treat PLAN as a peer, then either those navy brass were a bunch of idiot or they real do think PLAN is not a threat at all...
You are precisely correct. Yuan will be the one replacing the dollar. :D

The Chinese are slowly reducing US Treasury holding and Japan is the largest buyer of US bond, not China anymore. It Is giving US a slow death.
 
You are precisely correct. Yuan will be the one replacing the dollar. :D

lol, heard that time and again.

it was Yen (JPY) replacing the dollar in 1980s

Then it was Euro (EUR) in the 1990s

Then it was nothing during 2000s

and now the Chinese are saying Yuan will be replacing dollar in 2010s

I want actions, not just hot air........
 
lol, heard that time and again.

it was Yen (JPY) replacing the dollar in 1980s

Then it was Euro (EUR) in the 1990s

Then it was nothing during 2000s

and now the Chinese are saying Yuan will be replacing dollar in 2010s

I want actions, not just hot air........
Good, here come the action.

-start of AIIB
- increase inter trade with foreign countries using RMB.
-slowly internationalise RMB

Sieren′s China: The rapid rise of the yuan | World | DW.DE | 04.02.2015

Japan is never the size of US. She can never match her economical power. EU is just a United of euro nations that will never be united as long as they operate as a seperate countries.

China is a different story. She has a scale of US, resources rich and huge population. A very centralized government that makes thing work fast.
 
The Chinese are slowly reducing US Treasury holding and Japan is the largest buyer of US bond, not China anymore. It Is giving US a slow death.

You are right, Japan replace China as the top rank of US foreign debt creditor, by 700 millions, on a 1.2 trillions debt (that's ~0.005% different) and that 700 millions mean you can kill off US dollars without any repercussion...lol

As if that 700 millions would have make any different, I am pretty sure that don't even cover 1 month of interest...

http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/mfh.txt
 
PLAN ships
022533t41txiet91t1x04i_copy.jpg



USN ships
usa ships1.jpg

usa ships2.jpg






USN ships much more than PLAN's.
 
Good, here come the action.

-start of AIIB
- increase inter trade with foreign countries using RMB.
-slowly internationalise RMB

Sieren′s China: The rapid rise of the yuan | World | DW.DE | 04.02.2015

Japan is never the size of US. She can never match her economical power. EU is just a United of euro nations that will never be united as long as they operate as a seperate countries.

China is a different story. She has a scale of US, resources rich and huge population. A very centralized government that makes thing work fast.

1.) AIIB uses USD as a denomination currency, and it would not be AIIB who alter the distribution of world currency reserve, it is the world currency trade (Not world trade), and unless China ramp up world trade with other country (hence demand of RMB increase), there can be no challenge, and last I heard, China draw down the trade volume and for the first time, the export figure dropped and import figure remain the same for the first time, contribute to the lacken of GDP growth in 2015 projection

China s March exports shrink 15 percent year-on-year in shock fall - Yahoo7

2.) It is not inter-trade (by the way, no such term as inter trade, trade already have hinted on the meaning of international) that will put more % in world reserve. As long as the world hold the same amount of RMB, those trade surplus China trade with whomever would have to convert to the USD, that would only benefit the USD, with increased Chinese Trade.

The only way you can get a better slice of a pie is by having more country join a direct linkage with RMB and by-passed USD.

3.) RMB is already internationalize, that's what making deal with other country for linkage meant, you cannot re-international RMB. How you push your RMB is another issue tho

PLAN ships
View attachment 216166


USN ships
View attachment 216167
View attachment 216168





USN ships much more than PLAN's.

You only show USN's ship, you are missing USCG, USMC, US Army, US Merchant Marine ship...
 
Last edited:
China should use some Arab patsies to paralyse the USN; and since Saudi Arabia has also joined the AIIB, too, I'm sure some Arab economic patsies can do the economic job as well.
 
China should use some Arab patsies to paralyse the USN; and since Saudi Arabia has also joined the AIIB, too, I'm sure some Arab economic patsies can do the economic job as well.

What can Saudi's 3 frigate and 4 corvette can do lol??

Can you be more specific??

And I don't know why you lot get overhyped about AIIB and thinking it is a "God Saviour", the "Holy Grail" to defeat the US. If you lot have any sort of economic background, AIIB is in any and every way helping the growth of the USD as the AIIB would lend money, in USD, to previous non-qualified customer that WB and IMF rejects.

I don't quite understand why you think AIIB would hurt USD at all, yeah, it may hurt those banker, not getting a big end of year bonus, but well, they sort of deserve it, and it serve them right lol.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom