Pic of J-10B with WS-10X for the 8.1 Anniversary

[ChineseTiger1986]

 

[Akasa]

Looks like WS-10A.

Seems that the insiders on CJDBY were wrong about this.

 

[ironman]

There is certain procedures to fulfill for certification of aero engines.. the first amongst them is flight test it with a multiple engine aircraft by replacing one of its engines. It is said that WS-10, which rejected on behalf of poor performance but where is it tested ?? in a single engine platform ?.. hell no. Scientists wouldn't risk the pilot's life with a single engine test bed. So my assumption is that WS-10 rejected from the earlier stages at best a twin platform but not J-10.

 

[dingyibvs]

There is certain procedures to fulfill for certification of aero engines.. the first amongst them is flight test it with a multiple engine aircraft by replacing one of its engines. It is said that WS-10, which rejected on behalf of poor performance but where is it tested ?? in a single engine platform ?.. hell no. Scientists wouldn't risk the pilot's life with a single engine test bed. So my assumption is that WS-10 rejected from the earlier stages at best a twin platform but not J-10.

Where is it tested? It's already being equipped en masse on J-11B's! Even J-15 prototypes use a variant of the WS-10 now.

 

[houshanghai]

There is certain procedures to fulfill for certification of aero engines.. the first amongst them is flight test it with a multiple engine aircraft by replacing one of its engines. It is said that WS-10, which rejected on behalf of poor performance but where is it tested ?? in a single engine platform ?.. hell no. Scientists wouldn't risk the pilot's life with a single engine test bed. So my assumption is that WS-10 rejected from the earlier stages at best a twin platform but not J-10.

Bah! This's nonsense!


you know carrier turbofan is more difficult than single tubofan.

look!mass production j15 with ws10AH

 

[siegecrossbow]

The image clearly indicates that the WS-10 is being tested on a single engined platform. Don't know why we are arguing over this.

 

[ironman]

Where is it tested? It's already being equipped en masse on J-11B's! Even J-15 prototypes use a variant of the WS-10 now.

Then why not its fitted with J-10 ?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Now make some sense..

Jealousy is an ugly thing is it not?

The WS 10 series already powers over 50 J11BS, The prototype J 20, and J 15. Now it finally makes its way to single fighter like the J 10.

If even picture proof it is in a single fighter like the J 10 can not prove anything to jealous trolls like yourself what can?

 

[ironman]

The image clearly indicates that the WS-10 is being tested on a single engined platform. Don't know why we are arguing over this.

May be for ground testing.. but of course not for flying.. is that acceptable

 

[ironman]

Jealousy is an ugly thing is it not?

The WS 10 series already powers over 50 J11BS, The prototype J 20, and J 15. Now it finally makes its way to single fighter like the J 10.

If even picture proof it is in a single fighter like the J 10 can not prove anything to jealous trolls like yourself what can?

Proof speaks larger than this..

 

[tanlixiang28776]

May be for ground testing.. but of course not for flying.. is that acceptable

Only Indians would test turbofans only on the ground. Other countries are a little more practical in their applications.

 

[siegecrossbow]

Then why not its fitted with J-10 ?

The plane in question is a J-10B.

 

[siegecrossbow]

May be for ground testing.. but of course not for flying.. is that acceptable

Are you willing to bet your balls if the plane takes off in a couple weeks or so?

 

[ironman]

Are you willing to bet your balls if the plane takes off in a couple weeks or so?

But mine is fixed. You usually do that stuff ?

 

[ironman]

The plane in question is a J-10B.

and the reason ?