Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Oct 15, 2017
- 28,400
- -82
- Country
- Location
You can see F-35 has much larger rear flaps and canopy. Bigger surface area overall. And having 2 tails instead of 1 does not help either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Photo proves F-35 has bigger RCS than F-16.
- Thread starter Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
- Start date
- Status
war&peace
ELITE MEMBER
- Aug 12, 2015
- 33,769
- 18
- Country
- Location
do you even know what an RCS is? It stands for radar cross-section..so it has nothing to do with how an airplane appears in a photo. @pakistanipower samjhao issko
HannibalBarca
ELITE MEMBER
- Jan 4, 2017
- 8,647
- 3
- Country
- Location
- Came for Proof
- Saw Op Name
- Lost Hope in Him once and for All
- Post a Reply
- Took my Legs and Run!
- Saw Op Name
- Lost Hope in Him once and for All
- Post a Reply
- Took my Legs and Run!
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Oct 15, 2017
- 28,400
- -82
- Country
- Location
RCS depends on angles of deflection and surface area. From the photo we can compare RCS between 2 planes.
Last edited:
war&peace
ELITE MEMBER
- Aug 12, 2015
- 33,769
- 18
- Country
- Location
Mate, this concept is way above your level so kindly leave it alone.
Beny Karachun
BANNED
- May 30, 2016
- 6,582
- -37
- Country
- Location
STOP IT PLEASE DEAR GOD I CAN'T TAKE THAT SHIT ANYMORE
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Oct 15, 2017
- 28,400
- -82
- Country
- Location
Do you think I'm stupid or something?
jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Oct 24, 2012
- 19,321
- 387
- Country
- Location
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Oct 15, 2017
- 28,400
- -82
- Country
- Location
Science is not based on consent. Galileo beat the crap out of thousands of scientists over thousands of years when he dropped 2 balls from a tower.
Jinn Baba
SENIOR MEMBER
- Jul 16, 2015
- 3,067
- -1
- Country
- Location
F22 is bigger than them both and has proven itself (and it's stealth features) in countless international military exercises. Don't count size alone or number of tails.
And please - when you open up a new thread to make a point, add something of substance! Give proof to back up the claims you are making or else the other members will only mock you.
For example - you may be right here. But give proof that the larger flaps or two tails make the F35 non stealth. Give us something to take your point seriously.
And please - when you open up a new thread to make a point, add something of substance! Give proof to back up the claims you are making or else the other members will only mock you.
For example - you may be right here. But give proof that the larger flaps or two tails make the F35 non stealth. Give us something to take your point seriously.
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Oct 15, 2017
- 28,400
- -82
- Country
- Location
Yeah. How about bring it to France or Germany or Russia or China and see how it proves itself. They don't dare because it don't work.
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to judge RCS. There are only 2 factors determine RCS. Surface area and angles. F-35 has lots of surface area, very little angles, so bigger RCS than F-16. This anyone can see.
Darth Vader
SENIOR MEMBER
- Jun 19, 2011
- 4,463
- 3
- Country
- Location
YOU WIN MY FRIEND
war&peace
ELITE MEMBER
- Aug 12, 2015
- 33,769
- 18
- Country
- Location
No, mate I don't think you're stupid. But you're a funny little boy who thinks about subject about which you do not have enough knowledge.
I don't know about others but some of his posts make me laugh so loudly that people get scared
- Status
Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)
Similar threads
