Sabretooth
FULL MEMBER
An objective review cannot be expected from an FATF committee who has Pakistan's arch enemy as co-chair. An unbiased decision, in this case, would be impossible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
lols hindu-satanis defying logic since 1947!Alleged criminal in the dock : I don't like the judge, can you please change him?
Pak officials continue to entertain. "Hey, let me judge the judge."
Asad Umar writes to FATF to remove India from co-chair for Pakistan review
Web Desk
March 09,2019
![]()
ISLAMABAD: Finance Minister Asad Umar has said that he has the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) president to remove India from the position of co-chair for the Pakistan FATF review.
Asad Umar took to Twitter saying, “India has blatantly abused its position by lobbying to get Pakistan blacklisted in the last review in Paris. We successfully defended our position Alhamdulillah.”
According to The News report Pakistan will have to demonstrate its compliance on 15 major conditions of the FATF till May 2019 in order to avoid falling into blacklist.
In addition to these 15 major demands for the May-related deadline, the FATF in its last plenary meeting held in Paris also included three more steps for review in coming May/June meeting including (1) revising/updating Pakistan’s national risk assessment on terror financing, (2) improving FBR’s customs report on cash couriers to curb currency smuggling and (3) placing inter agency cooperation mechanism among law enforcing agencies at federal and provincial levels.
So the FATF will gauge performance on total 18 points, including three above-mentioned, in the coming FATF meeting expected to be held in Colombo in June.
Alleged criminal in the dock : I don't like the judge, can you please change him?
Pak officials continue to entertain. "Hey, let me judge the judge."
May I ask, FATF should think about india, it is India who promoted state sponsored terrorism in Pakistan, and indian serving naval officer was involved to promote terrorism in Pakistan, there will be a huge doubts on FATF transparency.
How india can judge our positive efforts when india is involved for the terrorism in Pakistan.




Alleged criminal in the dock : I don't like the judge, can you please change him?
Pak officials continue to entertain. "Hey, let me judge the judge."
lols hindu-satanis defying logic since 1947!
more like, the judge has had a 70 year rivalry with me, and has fought multiple wars.Alleged criminal in the dock : I don't like the judge, can you please change him?
Pak officials continue to entertain. "Hey, let me judge the judge."
Any respectable judge will excuse himself from case on slightest conflict of interest. But obviously we can't expect that Hindustanis will show any self-respect, so had to ask them out of judging a matter on which they are trying to get decision as per their wishes.
more like, the judge has had a 70 year rivalry with me, and has fought multiple wars.
In any sane court, the judge would have reqused himself.
Anyways, Pakistan is showing the world it is taking steps while India is showing the world the horros of Hindutva terror.
Well, minus India, how many in FATF had supported your cause ???
Maybe due to hindu-Satani Logic I guess ??![]()
why you guys are always desperate? why you always need USs balls to gain support? cant ylu guys do shit alone? the F supa!When Pakistan's incumbent Finance minister is happy sharing a photo Ops with a US designated Terrorist, I think you don't need India or anyone else to play the spoiler. Only the money trial need to be proved.
![]()
there might be some mistakes done by pakistan when it comes to financial dealings but we are rectifying those mistakes and having our arch enemy as co reviewer is stupid! well no surprise here every international organization is stupid!
and please dont use emoji i know you guys are "legit"
why you guys are always desperate? why you always need USs balls to gain support? cant ylu guys do shit alone? the F supa!
What conflict of interest? It's like in the Nuremberg Trials, Goering asking for removal of a Soviet, British or American judge. But even he had more sense.Any respectable judge will excuse himself from case on slightest conflict of interest. But obviously we can't expect that Hindustanis will show any self-respect, so had to ask them out of judging a matter on which they are trying to get decision as per their wishes.
and yet you ran to big daddy whenever Pakistan fked you!!Well the entire world know who was hanging over the U.S balls up until recent times. So don't make me open the basket of history. I just wanted to say actions speaks a 1000 times louder than words. Indeed non of the members are fools to believe SHAM actions. Period.