What's new

Pakistan takes back 3 'militants'

There are thousands of Pakistanis working here and everyday more are entertained with visas in AL regime. The persons in question did have contacts with terrorist groups who were operating in Bangladesh. Their call records as well as their regular visit to places proved that. That did not mean they were guilty of terrorism but certainly they were in suspect list. As the investigation coming to an end and they came out clean, they were allowed to go back. I do agree that their carreer gone screwed but they should had been more carefull and they were old enough to know that. Its a good lesson for them. I wish them good luck back home.

Still some pro-hindutva editor and media outlet tried to befool the Bangladeshis by using the word "Militants" and putting and orange headline like "Pakistan takes back----"???

lolzzz

the unbiased and reality based headline would have been "Three Pakistani nationals released after no evidence of militancy found"

or "3 Pakistani nationals proven innocent; released from BD Jail"
 
Still some pro-hindutva editor and media outlet tried to befool the Bangladeshis by using the word "Militants" and putting and orange headline like "Pakistan takes back----"???

lolzzz

the unbiased and reality based headline would have been "Three Pakistani nationals released after no evidence of militancy found"

or "3 Pakistani nationals proven innocent; released from BD Jail"

How do you know they are pro-hindutuva? Is it your journalistic instinct or display of your deep seated bigotry??
 
How do you know they are pro-hindutuva? Is it your journalistic instinct or display of your deep seated bigotry??

A professional ethical honest media outlet and editor will never use the word "militants" for those who are found NOT guilty by his own government and who are freed of all charges.

In case of BD we all know who are pro-hindutva anyway
 
A professional ethical honest media outlet and editor will never use the word "militants" for those who are found NOT guilty by his own government and who are freed of all charges.

In case of BD we all know who are pro-hindutva anyway

Your implication being since they are un-ethical and dishonest people from Bangladesh, hence they must be Hindus or Pro-Hindus! :tup:

Carry on.. you are doing great job representing Pakistani journalists and the their bigoted thought process here on internet!! :tup::tup:

Or perhaps you could provide sound reasoning backed by adequate proof to prove your above hypothesis?
 
Your implication being since they are un-ethical and dishonest people from Bangladesh, hence they must be Hindus or Pro-Hindus! :tup:

one media house or one person does not mean plural so stop your twisted false assumptions.


Carry on.. you are doing great job representing Pakistani journalists and the their bigoted thought process here on internet!!

first learn what does a bigot mean. Rest i dont consider personal attacks worth replying so.

:wave:

Or perhaps you could provide sound reasoning backed by adequate proof to prove your above hypothesis?

What is there to prove when the three young men arrested on fake charges proven to be innocent and freed by the government of BD. Then why would a media house/paper will publish a false, misleading headline ??
 
Your implication being since they are un-ethical and dishonest people from Bangladesh, hence they must be Hindus or Pro-Hindus! :tup:

Carry on.. you are doing great job representing Pakistani journalists and the their bigoted thought process here on internet!! :tup::tup:

Or perhaps you could provide sound reasoning backed by adequate proof to prove your above hypothesis?

R u blind or dumb cant u just see they were proven not guilty.
What Jana g has said is absolutly right ........
 
one media house or one person does not mean plural so stop your twisted false assumptions.




first learn what does a bigot mean. Rest i dont consider personal attacks worth replying so.

:wave:



What is there to prove when the three young men arrested on fake charges proven to be innocent and freed by the government of BD. Then why would a media house/paper will publish a false, misleading headline ??


Perhaps you din't comprehend, my question hence I will try again.

I am questioning your assumption that the said editor is a Pro- Hindutava? And could you back your claim with some concrete evidence that he is.
Perhaps one not assuming the fact, since he is anti-pakistan and hence a pro-hindu.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom