Really? They could have come for Iran as well. Yet Iran didn't oblige with US, Saudi interests so blindly the way Pakistan did!It may well be Pakistan's own fault, it probably is. But what if the soviets came for Pakistan after Afghanistan?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Really? They could have come for Iran as well. Yet Iran didn't oblige with US, Saudi interests so blindly the way Pakistan did!It may well be Pakistan's own fault, it probably is. But what if the soviets came for Pakistan after Afghanistan?
In 2013, the group responsible for almost a quarter of all deaths and 49% of all claimed attacks in the country was Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
If India being at number 6 give you guys a sense of security than glad we could help you out.You are talking like India is fully secure with no terrorist activities. Please look at the ranking and see where India is at. I don't think India is in a position to help anyone on terror related issues, especially when there is evidence of Indian financial support to these groups. Anyway, this is not a political thread so I'll stop this discussion here.
I never said any of those 3 things. Learn to read.why would india care for Pakistan.
terrorism in Pakistan is not indias problem. as long as it doesn't affect India.
and no India and Pakistan are not friends. keep that notion out.
Actually, Afghanistan's new government was thinking to do the same unilaterally for the time being. Pakistan has been blackmailing and abusing Afghanistan for decades since its a landlocked country and need Pakistan as a passway for trade and commerce with the outside world.IMO Pakistan have to close hes border with Afghanistan, then to clean the terrorists from inside
To give you an example ...hmm the way you haunt me with your casper like pale face same way Pakistan and its nefarious activities 're haunting India too.Pakistan is 3rd....India is 6th !
And even our biggest detractors don't state that we support the Commies who're responsible for the bulk of your woes so I can't imagine how we'd be affecting you anymore than you affecting us !![]()
WT...H???exactly and that is what my last thread was about ..... how "secularism" is used to shield this reality from us.
where do I start??You are talking like India is fully secure with no terrorist activities. Please look at the ranking and see where India is at. I don't think India is in a position to help anyone on terror related issues, especially when there is evidence of Indian financial support to these groups. Anyway, this is not a political thread so I'll stop this discussion here.
I saw that report and I am kind of confused with the report. It says on top that 5 countries account of 82% Terrorist attacks in just 5 countries so India should have less number of attacks and hence though it is on 6 it should have lot of gap between 5 and 6.India is on no 6 .... not so far away.
Developing country my a**
look at our friends on this list
Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria and Syria
followed by INDIA![]()
They are talking about per capita stats. India is on number 6 for total no. of attacks. Top risk list is considering population and other factors.I saw that report and I am kind of confused with the report. It says on top that 5 countries account of 82% Terrorist attacks in just 5 countries so India should have less number of attacks and hence though it is on 6 it should have lot of gap between 5 and 6.
Then it further states that following countries are top of Risk which does not include India either:
— Angola
— Bangladesh
— Burundi
— Central African Republic
— Cote d’Ivoire
— Ethiopia
— Iran
— Israel
— Mali
— Mexico
— Myanmar
— Sri Lanka
— Uganda
Then why India is on number 6? Am I missing something?
To give you an example ...hmm the way you haunt me with your casper like pale face same way Pakistan and its nefarious activities 're haunting India too.
WT...H???
how did you bring in secularism here???
whats wrong with you these days???
where do I start??
India has its problems and it''' be exacerbated by and disturbed neighborhood. I told you that we were "plodding" towards progress...and that it would "water down" our govt's efforts.May be you just skimmed through my posts.
Terrorism increased by 70 per cent in India from 2012 to 2013.
The number of attacks also increased, with 55 more attacks in 2013 than 2012.
the dominant editorial and media narrative of 2013 was about the dangers for India due to the ascendancy of “fringe right wing Hindu” groups. How could all our collective media/thought leadership fail us so easily? How could the entire Dilli-based editorial class miss the elephant in the room?
.No actually I read it further. They added deaths by Maoists as well apart from other factors so it is high. Also they are considering data for past 10 years to analyze.They are talking about per capita stats. India is on number 6 for total no. of attacks. Top risk list is considering population and other factors.
Read the same report in an indian context hereI saw that report and I am kind of confused with the report. It says on top that 5 countries account of 82% Terrorist attacks in just 5 countries so India should have less number of attacks and hence though it is on 6 it should have lot of gap between 5 and 6.
Then it further states that following countries are top of Risk which does not include India either:
— Angola
— Bangladesh
— Burundi
— Central African Republic
— Cote d’Ivoire
— Ethiopia
— Iran
— Israel
— Mali
— Mexico
— Myanmar
— Sri Lanka
— Uganda
Then why India is on number 6? Am I missing something?
EDIT: Never Mind, I got it. They are considering Maoists as well.
Whenever a tragic report regarding Pakistan is posted, some retarded Pakistanis start comparing the findings with archenemy India. What the heck?
Have we really got no self-respect, self-identity left?The rankins are also on log scale ... read the OP hereNo actually I read it further. They added deaths by Maoists as well apart from other factors so it is high. Also they are considering data for past 10 years to analyze.
So? Are maoists not terrorists?No actually I read it further. They added deaths by Maoists as well apart from other factors so it is high. Also they are considering data for past 10 years to analyze.