Pakistan Questions India’s Bid For Permanent Seat In UNSC

[Chakar The Great]

New Delhi: Pakistan has criticised India’s attempt for a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), calling it a ‘primary stumbling block’ for reforms.

Without naming India, Pakistan’s Permanent Representative Maleeha Lodhi criticized its suggestion to look for alternatives if the current negotiating process doesn’t make progress.

India’s Permanent Representative Syed Akbaruddin had said on Tuesday: “If despite our best efforts, credible progress evades us once again, then we should not shy away from reviewing how we engage on this very important issue.”

“Those calling for a review of the IGN process, should instead review their own positions because the quest by some to gain permanent seats for themselves remains the primary stumbling block and this was clearly evident from our discussions, yesterday,” she said.

Interestingly, India, Brazil, Germany and Japan are pursuing permanent seats for themselves in the UNSC. Furthermore, many Arab and African nations are vying for representations in the ranks of the permanent numbers.


Source: https://kalingatv.com/world/pakistan-questions-indias-bid-for-permanent-seat-in-unsc/

 

[MultaniGuy]

Pakistan and China will never allow India to get UNSC.

China is already a UNSC member seat. China would not do anything that hurts Pakistan's interests.

@Indus Pakistan @waz

I thought this was an interesting issue, because if India gets UNSC seat, this would hurt the Kashmir cause.

Your views?

 

[El Sidd]

Wishful thinking

 

[undercover JIX]

Modi is desperately trying to achieve anything to boast for, so far hi is failure, all promises became only jumla bazi but successfully achieve humiliation and isolation for Super Power India

 

[Saleet]

India’s attempt for a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)

These killers dont even have right to sit in their own country .... and asking for a seat in UNSC ... !!!
At least try to learn sit in the Toilet first, in case you have.

 

[beijingwalker]

 

[Baby Leone]

lol Indians in UN doesn't even feel shame to ask for that much?

BTW a country who doesn't even consider UN resolution on Kashmir dont even deserve to be a member of UN let aside permanent seat, Pakistan and other civilized countries should question India's membership in UN.

 

[New World]

Pakistan and China will never allow India to get UNSC.

China is already a UNSC member seat. China would not do anything that hurts Pakistan's interests.

@Indus Pakistan @waz

I thought this was an interesting issue, because if India gets UNSC seat, this would hurt the Kashmir cause.

Your views?

Even America will not allow india to get UNSC. All these american talks about getting india UNSC status is to get india as rival to china..

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

China would not do anything that hurts Pakistan's interests.

That is the wrong way to look at the situation - the correct view is that 'China will not do anything that hurts Chinese interests'. If Chinese interests align with Pakistani interests then that works out great for both countries.

 

[VCheng]

That is the wrong way to look at the situation - the correct view is that 'China will not do anything that hurts Chinese interests'. If Chinese interests align with Pakistani interests then that works out great for both countries.

The odds are that India will get its permanent seat but without veto power in a few years' time.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

The odds are that India will get its permanent seat but without veto power in a few years' time.

I believe that would be more in line with the Pakistani proposal, that the UNSC membership is expanded without an expansion in the veto power.

 

[VCheng]

I believe that would be more in line with the Pakistani proposal, that the UNSC membership is expanded without an expansion in the veto power.

It will be interesting to see how this goes forward.

BTW, why am I banned from this thread without notification?

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/restrictions-imposed-on-social-media.600286/

 

[MultaniGuy]

That is the wrong way to look at the situation - the correct view is that 'China will not do anything that hurts Chinese interests'. If Chinese interests align with Pakistani interests then that works out great for both countries.

That is what I really meant. Chinese interests merge with Pakistani interests.

That is the wrong way to look at the situation - the correct view is that 'China will not do anything that hurts Chinese interests'. If Chinese interests align with Pakistani interests then that works out great for both countries.

I already knew that, Every country looks after their own interests.

Its just that Chinese interests converge with Pakistani interests.

That is what I meant.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

It will be interesting to see how this goes forward.

BTW, why am I banned from this thread without notification?

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/restrictions-imposed-on-social-media.600286/

No clue. I'll ask.

 

[VCheng]

No clue. I'll ask.

Thanks, I don't really care but some justification would still be nice, if available.

Mullah Nashayb strikes again.

You may PM me to keep it out of this thread, thanks.