Pakistan has gone the extra mile for peace with India, but will they reciprocate?

[Goku]

Start by not providing medical treatment to terrorists in your hospitals under fake identities

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indi...s-medical-treatment-to-bla-terrorists.625789/

Stop protecting UN listed Terrorist like Hafeez Saeed and Masood Azhar , works both ways

 

[Republic]

Why you people are going these extraa miles again and again?? Why don't you just forget that there is any habitation beyond your eastern border ??
We don't have any thing to talk except our part of Kashmir which is under your control. But we are not insisting for talks and have decided to wait for the appropriate time to snatch it back.

Until then we are trying to forget there is any kind of population on the other side of the fence. I suggest you people to do the same.

In my opinion both nation should stop any kind of communication with each other. No awajahi. No high commission. Just a 100 feet high Steel wall between them.
That's all.
Thanks.

 

[Areesh]

Stop protecting UN listed Terrorist like Hafeez Saeed and Masood Azhar , works both ways

So we can't interfere in UN declared disputed territory but you can interfere in a territory with which you don't even share border

OK

 

[Goku]

So we can't interfere in UN declared disputed territory but you can interfere in a territory with which you don't even share border

OK

But you are interfering in "disputed territory"

 

[Areesh]

But you are interfering in "disputed territory"

Yes we are. Since you do in mainland Pakistan

 

[HammerHead081]

But you are interfering in "disputed territory"

Abey dimagi tor sei farigh admi ham disputed territory mei interfere kar rhe hain aur tum Balochistan mei jo kei disputed ni hai. How are both things equal?

 

[Kuru]

Start by not providing medical treatment to terrorists in your hospitals under fake identities

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indi...s-medical-treatment-to-bla-terrorists.625789/

I agree with you. Just because Pakistan has been providing diplomatic, financial and moral support to Kashmiri terrorists from last 70 years doesn't mean that India should treat BLA terrorists. I condemn it.

 

[Goku]

Abey dimagi tor sei farigh admi ham disputed territory mei interfere kar rhe hain aur tum Balochistan mei jo kei disputed ni hai. How are both things equal?

Look no point in debating , such debates turn into abuses , our governments will decide

 

[Areesh]

I agree with you. Just because Pakistan has been providing diplomatic, financial and moral support to Kashmiri terrorists from last 70 years doesn't mean that India should treat BLA terrorists. I condemn it.

So you can interfere in nondisputed territory from Karachi to Baluchistan to Bengal

But yeah Pakistan shouldn't interfere in a territory on which it shares a dispute

Makes sense obviously

 

[HammerHead081]

I agree with you. Just because Pakistan has been providing diplomatic, financial and moral support to Kashmiri terrorists from last 70 years doesn't mean that India should treat BLA terrorists. I condemn it.

"Kashmiri terrorists", Its Kashmiri freedom fighters btw.

Freedom Fighter: a person who takes part in a revolutionary struggle to achieve a political goal, especially in order to overthrow their government.

Person: Kashmiris, Revolutionary Struggle: Get freed from opression, Political goal: Join Pakistan or separate state, Government: Indian Army

Terrorist: a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Person: Indian army, Civilians: Kashmiris, Political aim: Change demographic of kashmir

MOD EDIT: Language

 

[HammerHead081]

Look you started abusing , chill its an online forum where easiest thing to do is troll and abuse

That's exactly what you are doing. Trolling, backing out of argument asap when you loose it.

 

[SIPRA]

Aman ki aasha
Hae ghatia tamaasha​

 

[Kuru]

So you can interfere in nondisputed territory from Karachi to Baluchistan to Bengal

But yeah Pakistan shouldn't interfere in a territory on which it shares a dispute

Makes sense obviously

You're right, Bengal, Karachi and Balochistan happened first, you only retaliated in Kashmir much much later. That's about right.

"Kashmiri terrorists", Its Kashmiri freedom fighters btw.

Freedom Fighter: a person who takes part in a revolutionary struggle to achieve a political goal, especially in order to overthrow their government.

Person: Kashmiris, Revolutionary Struggle: Get freed from opression, Political goal: Join Pakistan or separate state, Government: Indian Army

Terrorist: a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Person: Indian army, Civilians: Kashmiris, Political aim: Change demographic of kashmir


You are a fucking moron who tries to end conversations instead of accepting his mistake.

Oh yeah, I forgot the concept of Good Terrorist and Bad Terrorist. You see I'm coming to PDF after a long time. My apologies.

 

[SIPRA]

Oh yeah, I forgot the concept of Good Terrorist and Bad Terrorist. You see I'm coming to PDF after a long time. My apologies.

No. It is not Good Terrorist and Bad Terrorist; but the Terrorist of one group of people is the Hero of another group of people and this is the undeniable and indisputable fact of the past as well as current human civilizations. There are thousands of such examples; so don't try to be over altruistic.

 

[Kuru]

the Terrorist of one group of people is the Hero of another group of people and this is the undeniable and indisputable fact of the past as well as current human civilizations.

Sure I take it. Then I guess the TTP BLA must be Hero to some people which - according to you - is also a fact. I guess we agree on this one.