TheSolution
SENIOR MEMBER
I 100% agree with your first paragraph, there isn't a one model fits all, you need to analyse according to your unique specific requirements and work from there. Copy and pasting models for complex things usually fails. Cultures and current conditions vary so copying others doesn't work as well.Atatürk's system was such that the government built banks, and said banks funded government owned companies that built up the infrastructure of the country.. this laid the groundwork for the industrialisation of the whole country. After his death, most recently in Erdoğan's term, those companies were sold to foreigners at great economic loss. So planned economy can be good in the early stages of industrialisation and privatization can be bad if it's handled poorly.
Is the army trying to fix the economy by doing this or are they just trying to accumulate personal wealth for some corrupt generals? It's hard to tell from my position.You living in UK and me living in Turkey can't really tell what's happening, maybe the electric distribution companies were corrupt, maybe the army is even more corrupt.
On the topic of the army, there are likely elements of corruption but everyone is corrupt in Pakistan, so I find it funny when that's used as the excuse. There is just a general strong culture of corruption and nepotism.
My guess is that these appointments are more related to security matters and who they can trust. There have been data breaches in the past due to civillian workers, maybe army believes a retired officer is a more secure bet.