DeathInvader
FULL MEMBER
At least Indians use excessive force in Indian territory. What happens to Pakistan when American droned the hell outta its civilians. When did the deploration go then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No sir you fcuk off, did u like them waving pakistani flag, looks like even your private hair got burnt in anger.
Again the same idiocy.Oh Azad Kashmir tells it went very well
Not really. They can fly as many flags as they want. But the state stays with India. End of story. Go cry.No sir you fcuk off, did u like them waving pakistani flag, looks like even your private hair got burnt in anger.
Again the same idiocy.
Did you take Azad Kashmir from India? No, you invaded the independent country of Kashmir and took it from them.
The ruler then invited the Indian army to stop the marauding Pashtun tribal lashkars, and acceded to India.
Since the Indian army came there and drove you back from Srinagar (including the airport), have y ever taken an inch of land controlled by India? No.
I pity Pakistani schoolkids who are taught this myth that "Azad Kashmir" was taken from India. You invaded a small kingdom, and that is why they lost their independence.
Again - you attacked the small, independent kingdom of Kashmir. You did not take an inch from India. So the existence of "Azad Kashmir" proves nothing about India's might.Pakistanis are taught history much better than you. Like you who are taught half truths on Kashmir. Pakistanis know what you are taught and they also know the fact if they wouldn't have attacked they wouldn't have had Azad Kashmir and GB with them now. Keep your pity to yourself. You would need it

Again - you attacked the small, independent kingdom of Kashmir. You did not take an inch from India. So the existence of "Azad Kashmir" proves nothing about India's might.
Take even one inch from us, and then talk. Until then, Kashmir is India's, and there is nothing your country can do about it. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.![]()
It's pointless for Pakistan trying to civilise a deaf, dumb and blind democratically elected Hindu Fascist Government of India.
Jihad-e-Kashmir is the only language these statue worshippers understand.
!! 
Nope. You haven't. You tried to take it in '65, ended up desperately defending Lahore instead. Lost more than half the country in '71. Lost Siachen glacier and Saltoro in '84. Tried to regain them in '87, and failed. Tried to take Kashmir in '99, and failed. Gave up trying since then, and decided to "deplore" uselessly now and then.We have taken more than an inch from you. Pity your history again. But anyways I have made my point. You are taught half truths on Kashmir while we are far better than that. You can boost yourself on occupying whatever remaining part of your atoot ang you have for now.
Nope. You haven't. You tried to take it in '65, ended up desperately defending Lahore instead. Lost more than half the country in '71. Lost Siachen glacier and Saltoro in '84. Tried to regain them in '87, and failed. Tried to take Kashmir in '99, and failed.
That's your martial history, in a nutshell. You have not taken an inch from India. India has taken Siachen and other areas from you. Oh and also cut you in pieces. LOL.
Fact is we captured far more land in western sector apart from creating Bangladesh in 1971 but returned it back along with 93000 POW according to simla agreement plus retained some strategic areas which was never returned to pakWould focus only on the bold part since the rest is the bunch of half truths/lies that you Indians are normally fed by your state.
Still think we haven't taken an inch from you in atoot ang area?
Battle of Chamb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Would focus only on the bold part since the rest is the bunch of half truths/lies that you Indians are normally fed by your state.
Still think we haven't taken an inch from you in atoot ang area?
Battle of Chamb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Very well I suppose... it liberated lot of punjabis for all their problems... some became rich and some became worm food in unmarked graves...And how well did that work in the past?![]()
We gained additional Pakistanis territory in 1971 which we retained and not covered under simla agreementOh, FFS
Oh FFS. In a war territory is always captured by both sides, and then bargained for. It is the totality at the end of the war itself that matters. India and Pak have taken chunks of territory in individual battles. By that logic, India has even taken Lahore:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Status quo pro bellum is what matters. ie, what was the territorial change at the end of the war. The answer is that Pak lost half its country. Gaining one inch and losing one mile is not considered gaining, it is called losing.
When India captured Siachen and Saltoro, there was no equivalent capture by Pakistan. It was one sided.
Pakistan has tried since 1965 to take Kashmir from India, and never gained an inch. It has stopped trying since 1999. Now all it can do is "deplore" and cry in front of the world, and here on PDF. Keep it up.![]()
Yes, those Pakistani Punjabis have been selflessly sacrificing their lives to fertilize the soil of Indian Kashmir for quite a while now. 90% of LeT are Pak Punjabis, sent to die. But they still have this delusion that these unemployed cannon fodder youths would some day do what even their armed forces can't - take Kashmir from India.Very well I suppose... it liberated lot of punjabis for all their problems... some became rich and some became worm food in unmarked graves...
Oh, FFS
Oh FFS. In a war territory is always captured by both sides, and then bargained for. It is the totality at the end of the war itself that matters. India and Pak have taken chunks of territory in individual battles. By that logic, India has even taken Lahore:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Status quo pro bellum is what matters. ie, what was the territorial change at the end of the war. The answer is that Pak lost half its country. Gaining one inch and losing one mile is not considered gaining, it is called losing.
When India captured Siachen and Saltoro, there was no equivalent capture by Pakistan. It was one sided.
Pakistan has tried since 1965 to take Kashmir from India, and never gained an inch. It has stopped trying since 1999. Now all it can do is "deplore" and cry in front of the world, and here on PDF. Keep it up.![]()
Fact is we captured far more land in western sector apart from creating Bangladesh in 1971 but returned it back along with 93000 POW according to simla agreement plus retained some strategic areas which was never returned to pak
Battle of Basantar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia