Since Osama wanted to assassinate Obama, Obama decided to assassinate Osama first. So in reality Osama should be charged with attempting to assassinate Obama.
Preemptive strike or "Minority Report" Obama style?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Since Osama wanted to assassinate Obama, Obama decided to assassinate Osama first. So in reality Osama should be charged with attempting to assassinate Obama.
Preemptive strike or "Minority Report" Obama style?
why didnt us just blindly kill all the nazis that where captured? didnt they kill us people and soldiers to? why did they get a democratical court and then charged? what do they have that osama bin laden doesnt have?
i can say for sure that the only reason obama got peace prize is because he would never visit norway, just so you know it was the first time a us president visited norway since 2000. norwegian politicians are idiots. they dont look at other people who works for peace, but obama. who did so much great things for humanity.
The lawyer is wrong...And we have gone through this already...""Daniel Fiol has lodged a written complaint at the International Criminal Court accusing the US president of breaching the Geneva Convention for ordering the assassination of Osama bin Laden
In his written complaint, the Spanish lawyer said bin Laden should have been, arrested, tried and convicted according to the law. The killing of bin Laden was even worse as it took place in foreign territory, Pakistan, without the permission of that government, he said.""
Dunya TV Print: Osama killing: Obama accused of crimes against humanity
Convention (V) respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907.
CHAPTER I
THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS
Article 1. The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable.
Art. 2. Belligerents are forbidden to move troops or convoys of either munitions of war or supplies across the territory of a neutral Power.
Art. 3. Belligerents are likewise forbidden to:
(a) Erect on the territory of a neutral Power a wireless telegraphy station or other apparatus forthe purpose of communicating with belligerent forces on land or sea;
(b) Use any installation of this kind established by them before the war on the territory of a neutral Power for purely military purposes, and which has not been opened for the service of public messages.
Art. 4. Corps of combatants cannot be formed nor recruiting agencies opened on the territory of a neutral Power to assist the belligerents.
Art. 5. A neutral Power must not allow any of the acts referred to in Articles 2 to 4 to occur on its territory. It is not called upon to punish acts in violation of its neutrality unless the said acts have been committed on its own territory.
Art. 6. The responsibility of a neutral Power is not engaged by the fact of persons crossing the frontier separately to offer their services to one of the belligerents.
Art. 7. A neutral Power is not called upon to prevent the export or transport, on behalf of one or other of the belligerents, of arms, munitions of war, or, in general, of anything which can be of use to an army or a fleet.
Art. 8. A neutral Power is not called upon to forbid or restrict the use on behalf of the belligerents of telegraph or telephone cables or of wireless telegraphy apparatus belonging to it or to companies or private individuals.
Art. 9. Every measure of restriction or prohibition taken by a neutral Power in regard to the matters referred to in Articles 7 and 8 must be impartially applied by it to both belligerents. A neutral Power must see to the same obligation being observed by companies or private individuals owning telegraph or telephone cables or wireless telegraphy apparatus.
Art. 10. The fact of a neutral Power resisting, even by force, attempts to violate its neutrality cannot be regarded as a hostile act.
""Daniel Fiol has lodged a written complaint at the International Criminal Court accusing the US president of breaching the Geneva Convention for ordering the assassination of Osama bin Laden
In his written complaint, the Spanish lawyer said bin Laden should have been, arrested, tried and convicted according to the law. The killing of bin Laden was even worse as it took place in foreign territory, Pakistan, without the permission of that government, he said.""
Dunya TV Print: Osama killing: Obama accused of crimes against humanity
Preemptive strike or "Minority Report" Obama style?
Lets see your Turkish govt talk like this about the Kurds/PKK.
Dear readers, is not the world a safer place without the mass murderer Usama Bin-Laden (UBL)? Was it not Al Qaeda, his organization that claimed responsibility for orchestrating the 9/11 terrorist attacks which killed thousands of innocent civilians. UBL ideology is revealed when Al-Qaeda’s and their counterparts (TTP) continue their crimes against humanity while using his death as an excuse to continue their evil agenda.
When US Navy seals killed UBL on May 2nd, 2011 Justice was finally served to the survivors of all those killed by his inspiration of evil and hatred. Has this act not saved many innocents who would have fallen prey to his evil doing and ideology of hatred? Our mission against terrorism is ongoing and will not end until Al Qaeda and the Taliban are defeated and the world is one again free of terrorists.
CDR Bill Speaks,
DET, United States Central Command
U.S. Central Command
Dear readers, is not the world a safer place without the mass murderer Usama Bin-Laden (UBL)? Was it not Al Qaeda, his organization that claimed responsibility for orchestrating the 9/11 terrorist attacks which killed thousands of innocent civilians. UBL ideology is revealed when Al-Qaeda’s and their counterparts (TTP) continue their crimes against humanity while using his death as an excuse to continue their evil agenda.
When US Navy seals killed UBL on May 2nd, 2011 Justice was finally served to the survivors of all those killed by his inspiration of evil and hatred. Has this act not saved many innocents who would have fallen prey to his evil doing and ideology of hatred? Our mission against terrorism is ongoing and will not end until Al Qaeda and the Taliban are defeated and the world is one again free of terrorists.
CDR Bill Speaks,
DET, United States Central Command
U.S. Central Command