What's new

[opinion] You can't beat carbon dioxide. You can't beat God's creation.

The problem with CO2, though it has smaller greenhouse effect than methane, is that it is very very stable. There is no effective way to reduce it in a massive scale except through photosynthesis by plants. Methane, on the other hand, doesn't stay long. Therefore, reducing methane is much more cost-effective in containing global warming.
 
The problem with CO2, though it has smaller greenhouse effect than methane, is that it is very very stable. There is no effective way to reduce it in a massive scale except through photosynthesis by plants. Methane, on the other hand, doesn't stay long. Therefore, reducing methane is much more cost-effective in containing global warming.

That's right. CO2 is stable. CH4 is not stable. CH4 + 2 O2 -> CO2 + 2 H2O. That's why most planets have a lot of CO2, very little CH4.
 
Humans change atmosphere by 0.01%. That is negligible.
And what for emission control for industries and vehicles in every western countries and some eastern countries you brain fart @undertakerwwefan
There is plenty of national parks and nature reserves. Look at the satellite image. Most of the land has been turned into farmland
I am talking as a whole world the jungles and cultivated lands becomes scantier due to population increase and other fators you admit or not but that's a reality @undertakerwwefan
You are wrong. God created fossil fuels for humans to burn. That's the only purpose God made fossil fuels.
Your mental diease has no cure go to physic please and get a hike @undertakerwwefan
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom