If an F-15 equipped with AMRAAMS is approaching, can you ignore it because it is "outdated?" We have them... let's use them.
If this is the way it is done than why not modify Mig-21s to carry AMRAAM?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If an F-15 equipped with AMRAAMS is approaching, can you ignore it because it is "outdated?" We have them... let's use them.
what's wrong with them? they're OLDDD
you know, like high mileage, falling apart type of old. if you drive a car you would understand.
it's more like we have them, let's sell them to india or something
and F35 is better then F22 in ground target missions? who told you that? F35 can barely carry 2 small bombs. at least F22 has a respectable payload.
what do you mean give to India?
Are we beggars?
Keep the old planes with you..
He said "sell". Anyway they can try but I doubt India would be interested.
You guys are not thinking clearly.
No one is saying the F-22 stays on the ground. The idea is to pair them in mixed formations.
The range of the AMRAAM exceeds the detection range of the F-22. In other words, F-22's can be flying closer, can provide target tracking information to the F-15's who can launch and leave. The AMRAAM is guided to the target and the F-22 has not fired a shot. Anything fired at the retreating F-15's is defeated kinematically. That's what modern datalinking does.
The Chinese have flown a prototype that (IMO) does not appear to be in the F-22 class, more like the F-35 class, if that. To go from prototype to IOC (Initial Operational Capability) takes years.
Ridiculous. Behind only the F-22, it is probably the most dangerous operational fighter in existence. The T-50 and J-20 are both in the prototype stage. What other fighter aloft now is superior?
Typhoon? Rafale? Debatable. The latest Sukhois are equivalent. If an F-15 equipped with AMRAAMS is approaching, can you ignore it because it is "outdated?" We have them... let's use them.
Again, what better stuff do you refer to?
This has been flogged endlessly. The F-35 is a multi-role aircraft designed to replace the F-16. The F-22 is optimized for A2A. We need both of them. In many ways, especially in ground attack, the F-35 will be superior to the F-22.
The whole article is about one thing. F-15C with ASEA. Is this a news?![]()
J-11Bs and J-10Bs will be equiped with them too.
Is being is a bigger news than "will be".

http://www.anikaos.com/0040-onion_msn_smileys.html
with upgrades, could prove to be an even better J-20-killer than the newer, more expensive F-22.
Boeing's another advertisement.F-15C with AESA is better than F-22 when countering steath fighter.![]()

Let me guess...You got this off Rachel Maddow...???In that case we already have ourshelves some F-22 killers? We have J-10b and J-11b and soon J-15's for the aircraft carrier. Since they will all have AESA and slight stealth capabilities
F-22 kinda defeats itself since it will encounter critical failure every 1.7 hours and per every hour of flight it will require up to 12 hours of maintenance. By the looks of things they won't even get to enter the Chinese aerospace and make it out alive..lol
F-15's will just get picked off by the anti air missiles or get out maneuvered, out gunned and eaten alive by the J-10b and J-11b's since they have no stealth capabilities.
Her crap has been debunked here many times.There happens to be a major difference in "12 hours" and "12 man hours" Go figure. Anywho the rubbish you quote has been, as Gambit said, "Debunked numerous times".F-22 kinda defeats itself since it will encounter critical failure every 1.7 hours and per every hour of flight it will require up to 12 hours of maintenance. By the looks of things they won't even get to enter the Chinese aerospace and make it out alive..lol
Which sim game is that?F-15's will just get picked off by the anti air missiles or get out maneuvered, out gunned and eaten alive by the J-10b and J-11b's since they have no stealth capabilities.