What's new

Oil-for-gold: Tehran’s metal shield from sanctions

Major Shaitan Singh

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 7, 2010
3,550
43
6,364
Country
India
Location
India
sanctions-oil-for-gold-tehrans-shield.n.jpg


India has reportedly agreed to pay Tehran in gold for the oil it buys, in a move aimed at protecting Indians from the US-led financial sanctions targeting Iran. China, which also refused to side with the oil embargo, may follow Delhi’s lead.
The move comes as a surprise, reports Israeli-based news website DEBKAfile, since earlier India and Iran said they would switch to yen and rupees in their trade. The report says backup alternatives are being negotiated with China and Russia, should the US and EU find a way to block the gold payment mechanism.
India and China need to switch from the dollar in bilateral trade, since the US and EU have issued unilateral sanctions against the Iranian oil industry and financial institutions. The sanctions would ban any bank involved in oil trade with Iran from dealing with American and European counterparts.
Both India and China, two major buyers of Iranian oil accounting for 22 and 13 percent of its total export respectively, have refused to join such sanctions. This means they have to establish a reliable way of paying for crude, independently of the parts of the global financial system controlled by New York and London.
Delhi’s current plan is to effect payments through two state-owned banks, India’s UCO Bank and Turkey’s Halk Bankasi, Turkey being another country refusing to join the sanction spree.
The US issued sanctions against Iran in December, aiming to put pressure on the Islamic Republic and make its controversial nuclear program more transparent. The EU joined the initiative on Monday, banning new oil contracts with Iran, but allowing current ones to be fulfilled.
Japan and South Korea, two other major buyers of Iranian crude, are in talks with Washington over the issue, although both Seoul and Tokyo are worried that stopping their imports could hurt their economies.
Iran, which is highly dependent on its sales of oil, is reacting to the sanction campaign nervously. Tehran says it will not yield to pressure, and threatens to block the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil tanker route in the Persian Gulf.
 
China can pay in HQ-19 SAM's and C-803 antiship missiles. :D

HQ-9(The Chinese version of S-300) or HQ-19? S300 isn't as important as before for us now, and we have C-802 antiship missiles and have mass produced it as well xD What advantages do C-803 have in comparison to C-802? Does China have Yakhont and Brahmos missiles? xD Let's make a deal over those ones xD lol
 
HQ-9(The Chinese version of S-300) or HQ-19? S300 isn't as important as before for us now, and we have C-802 antiship missiles and have mass produced it as well xD What advantages do C-803 have in comparison to C-802? Does China have Yakhont and Brahmos missiles? xD Let's make a deal over those ones xD lol

Ahem ..Ahem.. Did i just hear BRAHMOS ..? :P
 
Ahem ..Ahem.. Did i just hear BRAHMOS ..? :P

well, China is a strategic ally of Russia, so how do you know they haven't got any Brahmos secretly from Russia? :P The Chinese will reverse-engineer everything :D They can even reverse engineer Medmedev :P
 
well, China is a strategic ally of Russia, so how do you know they haven't got any Brahmos secretly from Russia? :P The Chinese will reverse-engineer everything :D They can even reverse engineer Medmedev :P

They should do this....
 
HQ-9(The Chinese version of S-300) or HQ-19? S300 isn't as important as before for us now, and we have C-802 antiship missiles and have mass produced it as well xD What advantages do C-803 have in comparison to C-802? Does China have Yakhont and Brahmos missiles? xD Let's make a deal over those ones xD lol
Sorry, I meant sell HQ-9, not HQ-19. HQ-19 is the next generation SAM currently under development (equivalent to S-400). HQ-9 is equivalent to S-300 PMU-1.

C-803's advantage over C-802 is the supersonic end-game. The C-802 is always subsonic while C-803 goes supersonic at the end. It is much harder to intercept.

Yakhont and Brahmos are inferior to C-803 in the parameters of weight, size and cost.
 
Sorry, I meant sell HQ-9, not HQ-19. HQ-19 is the next generation SAM currently under development (equivalent to S-400). HQ-9 is equivalent to S-300 PMU-1.

C-803's advantage over C-802 is the supersonic end-game. The C-802 is always subsonic while C-803 goes supersonic at the end. It is much harder to intercept.

Yakhont and Brahmos are inferior to C-803 in the parameters of weight, size and cost.

Just far better in parameters of impact and damage to the target...:)
 
Sorry, I meant sell HQ-9, not HQ-19. HQ-19 is the next generation SAM currently under development (equivalent to S-400). HQ-9 is equivalent to S-300 PMU-1.

C-803's advantage over C-802 is the supersonic end-game. The C-802 is always subsonic while C-803 goes supersonic at the end. It is much harder to intercept.

Yakhont and Brahmos are inferior to C-803 in the parameters of weight, size and cost.

Thanks for the info. C803 is a good choice. However, Brahmos carries a 300 kg warhead (the Chinese C803 carries a 165 kg warhead) and Brahmos travels at mach 3 (the Chinese C803 travels at mach 2). Can you do a comparison between the unit costs too? Thanks.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom