What's new

Nuclear hellstorm if bin Laden is caught or killed: al-Qaida

Status
Not open for further replies.

madooxno9

BANNED
Nov 21, 2010
2,364
-7
2,802
Country
India
Location
Poland
WASHINGTON: Al-Qaida terrorists have threatened to unleash a "nuclear hellstorm" on the West if their leader and world's most wanted terrorist Osama bin Laden is nabbed.

A senior al-Qaida commander has claimed that the terror group has stashed away a nuclear bomb in Europe which will be detonated if bin Laden is ever caught or assassinated, according to new top secret files made public by internet whistleblower WikiLeaks.

The documents are secret details of the background to the capture of each of the 780 people held at or have passed through the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba, along with their medical condition and the information they have provided during interrogations.

The documents have been released to select European and US news outlets and reveal that the day 9/11 terror killings took place in United States, the core of al-Qaida was concentrated in a single city of Karachi in Pakistan.
 
Seems to be just a claim and an empty threat to delay the inevitable , but does give an insight to the threat perception the U.S agencies face . Used to think U.S preventive measures , Gitmo and all the interrogative practices as excessive , but with such threats , whether credible or not ...who would take a chance ..
 
'.in' part of your link says it all. No comment needed on topic as this pattern has become a regular feature of Indian news agencies. So yes, their will be a neuclear hellstorm on india ...Be afraid.. be very very afraid :coffee:
 
'.in' part of your link says it all. No comment needed on topic as this pattern has become a regular feature of Indian news agencies. So yes, their will be a neuclear hellstorm on india ...Be afraid.. be very very afraid :coffee:

I Remember when SomeOne Last time said This :rofl:
 
Royally fuck3d if true !!

Not really, you have to understand the mindset of a terrorist, and his/her objectives.

Killing and terrorizing are two different things. Killing may be a part of terrorism, but terrorism in itself capitalizes on threat.

What I am trying to say here is that there are innumerable modes of mass killings that do not require a great know-how /scientific knowledge or any sort of highly expensive material like nukes/Uranium. So, when one wants to merely raise the number of dead, one would rather resort to other much cheaper but equally lethal alternatives (Like Ricin) than go for easily perceptible Uranium.

Remember, the gangsters always prefer guns to poison because of the 'bang' effect. Desired result is the fear, and not the number.
 
You cant just detonate a nuke with a fuse and kabooOOoom.
You need arming and detonation codes and advanced knowledge in all the fancy nuclear bomb sh*t before you can detonate it.

A baseless claim by an idiot and i am amazed at the mentality of the person who posted this before even thinking it through.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom