Where are you coming up with the crap that 40% of non-lethal supplies pass over Pakistan? It was 80% just a couple of weeks ago. Any souirce?
Seems the US has mastered the art of teleportation

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where are you coming up with the crap that 40% of non-lethal supplies pass over Pakistan? It was 80% just a couple of weeks ago. Any souirce?

Seems the US has mastered the art of teleportation![]()
Where are you coming up with the crap that 40% of non-lethal supplies pass over Pakistan? It was 80% just a couple of weeks ago. Any souirce?
Pakistan is a key supply route for fuel, military vehicles, spare parts, clothing and other non-lethal supplies for foreign troops in landlocked Afghanistan -- although NATO has reduced its reliance on the country by using Central Asian routes to the north. NATO now ships about 40 percent of its non-lethal supplies through Pakistan, down from 80 percent at its peak.
It's a stupid claim to begin with. If it changed to 40% from 80% then no doubt we'd have already heard from bhartis over and over agian.

Pakistan had registered a formal protest against the setting up of the security check posts so close to the border.
It happened because US/NATO invaders are here for the last 9 Years.
there is a story about body parts and the moral is an @$$hole is always the boss.
. Man.. One risky thing to do if there ever wasSo the US leaves the bases that Pakistan protested about in the first place and some how its the US fault. Seems no mater what the US does some one turns it arround and claims its an attack on Pakistan.

That is an Idiotic assumption by US/NATO. We are fighting those who turned their guns at us due to our alliance with US and due to our operations against these Taliban for the sake of US/NATO. So this US ploy to push Taliban into Pakistan for terrorism can pretty well be rebounded against US itself.
We have NO issue with these Taliban in the first place if US is excluded
Read my post above and tell me if it still looks stupid?![]()

This question is now asked too many times. I read this all over the news when you blocked it.
Here is the link
Pakistan Reopens Afghan Border Crossing NATO Uses - FoxNews.com
and this
Pakistan reopens Afghan border crossing NATO uses - World news - South and Central Asia - Afghanistan - msnbc.com
and this
Breakthrough over Pakistan border blockade - World - NZ Herald News
you can find more if you google
"40 percent of its non-lethal supplies through Pakistan"
ever wondered that maybe, just maybe that this supply of 40% was temporary; until Pakistan re-opens supplies.
If we are so useless to them or if their supply route through Pak is useless, then why did they beg us to re-open it?
A cheaper route for 40% supplies is still lot of money.
I think US already made enough fool of itself infront of people by Iraq WMD episode. Now if they start WMDs going in wrong hand song no one is going to listen to it. Did you hear any recent news about WMDs security problem? Because they know its not working.The attack in Pakistan will be different from Afghanistan and Iraq.
1) First they will not attack to conqure so very limited attack will happen.
2) While people in their country were not convinced about WMD in Iraq and hence difference of opinion, in case of Pakistan every one believes that terrorism is being sheltered their. So people will support it.
3) Limited attack need less resource and money. It is very little Pakistan can do in response.
