What's new

NATO chief says alliance must prepare ‘to address the rise of China'

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 4, 2011
66,202
-55
99,772
Country
China
Location
China
NATO chief says alliance must prepare ‘to address the rise of China'
by Joel Gehrke
| August 07, 2019 05:25 PM

China’s efforts to establish economic and even military influence far beyond its borders are pushing NATO to develop new plays for the Indo-Pacific, the security bloc’s civilian chief says.

“Investing heavily in critical infrastructure in Europe, increased presence in the Arctic, and also increased presence in Africa, and in cyberspace,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Wednesday in Australia, ratting off a list of recent Chinese activity.

“So all of this makes it important for NATO to address the rise of China, and we do that not least by working closely with our partners in this region: Australia, New Zealand, but also Japan and South Korea."

China is outside the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's traditional area of responsibility, but European allies have a stake in the rivalry between Washington and a rising Beijing, and not just because they depend on American military support. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s multitrillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative stretches from Asia to Africa and Europe, and Chinese strategists have also identified the Arctic and Latin America as areas of strategic importance in that geopolitical competition.

“This is not about moving NATO into the Pacific, but this is about responding to the fact that China is coming closer to us,” Stoltenberg told Reuters Wednesday.

Stoltenberg marked the third day of a trip through the Indo-Pacific region by extending a defense cooperation agreement with Australia. That document builds on previous partnership agreements: Australians, for instance, fight alongside NATO member-state troops in Afghanistan, though the country joined the war in a separate treaty with the United States after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

“What we’re doing is saying not only what we have been doing today is important, but, in light of our discussions today and again tomorrow in Canberra, we are looking at new areas to work together in the Indo-Pacific,” Australian defense minister Linda Reynolds said during a joint press conference with the NATO chief.

The details of that expanded partnership remain unclear, but Stoltenberg pointed to cybersecurity and maritime cooperation to fight piracy and protect vital shipping lanes as potential areas of collaboration.

“The agreement we signed today is a framework, and then we fill it with activities and content as we move forward,” Stoltenberg said.

Threats from China have been under discussion since at least April, when the U.S. ambassador to NATO told the Washington Examiner that the transatlantic allies are “looking at the risk” posed by China “buying rights into seaports in Italy as well as in other parts of the world.”

Those worries could drive a major strategic shift inside NATO, a constellation of North American and European powers established to deter attacks by the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Russian analysts assess that disagreements between U.S. and European allies will keep NATO “restricted geographically mainly to the areas adjacent to Europe, including the Middle East and North Africa.”

"Although China’s economic growth in recent years has increasingly worried Europe, American regional allies do not cherish comparable tensions with Beijing,” Russian strategists wrote in a report last year. “They are more committed to deriving benefits from cooperation with the rising economic giant than to deter China’s ambitions in a faraway Asia-Pacific.”

But that attitude might be changing as China seeks to claim sovereignty over vital international shipping lanes and establishes outposts around the world, including in the heart of Europe.

“The more unpredictable and challenging the security environment is, the more important is it that we stay together, work together, stand together, and protect a rules-based world order, and that’s the purpose of the partnership between Australia and NATO,” Stoltenberg added Wednesday.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...nce-must-prepare-to-address-the-rise-of-china
 
NATO is in Europe. China is in Asia.
Someone forgot their geography

Usa runs Nato dont forget while japan, sk and australia are all close allies to nato.

Hence why its normal that China is the next big thing in geopolitics. Russia is still the traditional rival for Nato but China is now going to be included as something that has to be contained.
 
Usa runs Nato dont forget while japan, sk and australia are all close allies to nato.

Hence why its normal that China is the next big thing in geopolitics. Russia is still the traditional rival for Nato but China is now going to be included as something that has to be contained.

core or most of NATO is in Europe
 
Who dominates it?? The USA

Europe is needed as external partner in Asian NATO along with USA. Anti-China alliance might become a self-fulfilling prophecy. A lot of Asian states want to hedge their bets. Nothing more at this time.
 
I think US should stop funding NATO, these EU boyz are spoiled brat. What Trump told them last time, still they fail to implement. They don t want spend there money to update defence hardware....but they want free.
 
NATO chief says alliance must prepare ‘to address the rise of China'
by Joel Gehrke
| August 07, 2019 05:25 PM

China’s efforts to establish economic and even military influence far beyond its borders are pushing NATO to develop new plays for the Indo-Pacific, the security bloc’s civilian chief says.

“Investing heavily in critical infrastructure in Europe, increased presence in the Arctic, and also increased presence in Africa, and in cyberspace,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Wednesday in Australia, ratting off a list of recent Chinese activity.

“So all of this makes it important for NATO to address the rise of China, and we do that not least by working closely with our partners in this region: Australia, New Zealand, but also Japan and South Korea."

China is outside the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's traditional area of responsibility, but European allies have a stake in the rivalry between Washington and a rising Beijing, and not just because they depend on American military support. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s multitrillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative stretches from Asia to Africa and Europe, and Chinese strategists have also identified the Arctic and Latin America as areas of strategic importance in that geopolitical competition.

“This is not about moving NATO into the Pacific, but this is about responding to the fact that China is coming closer to us,” Stoltenberg told Reuters Wednesday.

Stoltenberg marked the third day of a trip through the Indo-Pacific region by extending a defense cooperation agreement with Australia. That document builds on previous partnership agreements: Australians, for instance, fight alongside NATO member-state troops in Afghanistan, though the country joined the war in a separate treaty with the United States after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

“What we’re doing is saying not only what we have been doing today is important, but, in light of our discussions today and again tomorrow in Canberra, we are looking at new areas to work together in the Indo-Pacific,” Australian defense minister Linda Reynolds said during a joint press conference with the NATO chief.

The details of that expanded partnership remain unclear, but Stoltenberg pointed to cybersecurity and maritime cooperation to fight piracy and protect vital shipping lanes as potential areas of collaboration.

“The agreement we signed today is a framework, and then we fill it with activities and content as we move forward,” Stoltenberg said.

Threats from China have been under discussion since at least April, when the U.S. ambassador to NATO told the Washington Examiner that the transatlantic allies are “looking at the risk” posed by China “buying rights into seaports in Italy as well as in other parts of the world.”

Those worries could drive a major strategic shift inside NATO, a constellation of North American and European powers established to deter attacks by the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Russian analysts assess that disagreements between U.S. and European allies will keep NATO “restricted geographically mainly to the areas adjacent to Europe, including the Middle East and North Africa.”

"Although China’s economic growth in recent years has increasingly worried Europe, American regional allies do not cherish comparable tensions with Beijing,” Russian strategists wrote in a report last year. “They are more committed to deriving benefits from cooperation with the rising economic giant than to deter China’s ambitions in a faraway Asia-Pacific.”

But that attitude might be changing as China seeks to claim sovereignty over vital international shipping lanes and establishes outposts around the world, including in the heart of Europe.

“The more unpredictable and challenging the security environment is, the more important is it that we stay together, work together, stand together, and protect a rules-based world order, and that’s the purpose of the partnership between Australia and NATO,” Stoltenberg added Wednesday.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...nce-must-prepare-to-address-the-rise-of-china

It is interesting to note that more recently NATO has backed off critising Russia, and now openly critising China. They have obviously changed they strategy. But never has it happened in history when you are dealing with a country that has 1/6th of the Humanity living there, and also has huge wealth. These NATO chimp-munks don't stand a chance.
 
South Korea is nothing to worry about, they will never join NATO, because China can crush their economy.
Japan on the other hand, there is a chance they might become a NATO member, few years ago Angela Merkel sugested to Abe that Japan should join NATO back at that time Japan refused, but with enough pressure from the US they might join.

Australia & New Zealand are also nothing to worry about, even if they join they are in the corner of the world far away from China.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom