Nathuram Godse ; a true patriot says pragya thakur

[Vikki]

 

[Mugwop]

A patriot really? He killed a poor innocent man for different views and ideology.

 

[SIPRA]

Such utterances are natural; since those currently in power ascribe to the same ideology, which Nathuram Godse professed. Gandhi, in any case, had become grossly irrelevant, in the last phase of Indian independence (1945 - 1947) and, more so after independence, when he was conveniently put aside, even by Indian National Congress.

 

[Agnihotra]

He was, may he rest in peace.

 

[Chanakyaa]

Please Listen to Him and Then Decide :

 

[SIPRA]

A patriot really? He killed a poor innocent man for different views and ideology.

We must understand one thing that fundamentally there was no difference in the objectives of INC and Hindutva parties, as far as the Muslims of subcontinent were concerned. Both intended to subjugate and suppress Muslims and abrogate their political, economic, social and religious rights; the only difference was of the methodology and pace. INC intended to do it, clandestinely and covertly, in the garb of secularism; whereas Hindutva zealots professed this objective overtly and openly and wanted to achieve it as such. This is what Quaid e Azam thought.

 

[Gadkari]

Of course he was a Patriot. Nobody who knows history can deny that.

This course is not only my words, but also of Dr. B R Ambedkar.

Ambedkar in 1948- "Godse did a good thing. Gandhi was a danger to the country. Good will come out of Gandhi's death."

Dr. Ambedkar as India's law minister wanted to commute the sentence of Godse, an offer which Godse promptly denied to avail. Ambedkar the God of Indian liberals actually ended up praising Godse.

Imagine the integrity of the Man called Nathuram Godse, his conviction and values. Can you think of any other patriot who DENIED to avail of an offer of commutation of sentence ?

The above quote excepted from Ambedkar's letter is published in "Letters of Ambedkar(1993)", Page 205

Ambedkar said that a good 70 years back.

Why was the "liberals" silent for the last 70 years ?

 

[hussain0216]

The face of hindutva extremism and terrorism

This is the rising hindutvaism in india

 

[Gadkari]

The face of hindutva extremism and terrorism

This is the rising hindutvaism in india

By that same standard, Dalit extremism and terrorism is also exposed when Dr. Ambedkar made those exact same comments.

 

[Mugwop]

We must understand one thing that fundamentally there was no difference in the objectives of INC and Hindutva parties, as far as the Muslims of subcontinent were concerned. Both intended to subjugate and suppress Muslims and abrogate their political, economic, social and religious rights; the only difference was of the methodology and pace. INC intended to do it, clandestinely and covertly, in the garb of secularism; whereas Hindutva zealots professed this objective overtly and openly and wanted to achieve it as such. This is what Quaid e Azam thought.

You nailed it man.