Muslims attack French satirical paper Charlie Hebdo.

[Perceptron]

Those countries don't let Indians in. So it's not possible.

Please don't spout nonsense just to increase your postcount. There are 25K+ members in both of the East Asian countries mentioned. Accept your ignorance and move on.

 

[roadrunner]

Terrorism is to kill innocent people.

Isnt it collateral damage?

No, terrorism is killing someone without trial.

 

[Perceptron]

roadrunner,

yaar yeh doosray mulk may ja ker kiya larain gay , while their history is to wellcome the invaders with open arms

GHAIRAT OR HAMMIAT SAY UN KO KIYA LAINA DAINA

TARIQ

Arre bhai, to tum Amrika mein kyun nahi drone maarte, ya unke logon par humla karte ? Kya tum mein bhi woh ghairat/himmat nahi hai ?

 

[roadrunner]

Back on topic.

Isn't this what French people do? They burnt down the cinema in St Michel Street when the Last Temptation of Christ was shown.

Why would French Muslims react differently?

 

[raavan]

Isnt it collateral damage?

No, terrorism is killing someone without trial.

During 9/11 the only target was innocent civilians so only a fool would think of collateral damage. Same is the case with this newspaper incident

 

[roadrunner]

Just like Gujerat. Though we were discussing Ludman Singh. People are innocent until proven guilty. Therefore targeting an innocent person.

Anyhow your argument is offtopic, weak, and a waste of time. It was terrorism, just not your kind of terrorism.

I'd like to hear anyone with a refute to post #125.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Terrorism is to kill innocent people. Killing hitler,laden,kasab etc is not terrorism. its called justice.

The actions of French Muslims was an act of terrorism? Wow, new to me. Their actions are more like vandalism.

Hitler wasn't killed, he committed suicide.