And still you decide to ignore. Who are you trying to fool?
Back to the topic:
What are the chances of Hillary Clinton continuing as Secretary of State should Obama win a second term?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And still you decide to ignore. Who are you trying to fool?
Back to the topic:
What are the chances of Hillary Clinton continuing as Secretary of State should Obama win a second term?
I believe she has done all the real talking and set the tone. If there is one person on Obama team who is handling foreign policy point blank then you don't have to look far. She is the real man on Obama's team.
And still you decide to ignore. Who are you trying to fool?
Her continuation (subject to Obama's re-election) would mean that her words should give an indication of future US policy in the region.
What are his chances of winning the second term if the withdrawal from Afghanistan does not happen ? Does Obama have enough good will / domestic diversion to keep the voters interested ?
Back to the topic:
What are the chances of Hillary Clinton continuing as Secretary of State should Obama win a second term?
No more lies.
.......................
On topic, Hilary is just a mouth piece that allows anyone to empower her presence within the US government. Her policies concerning Pakistan seem to coincide with issues regarding propaganda within Pakistan. It' basically like she does what someone tells her in the white house.**** that ****.
Back to the topic:
Mrs Clinton obviously has made a very strongly and cleverly worded diplomatic statement, that should be understood quite carefully, specially by the Pakistani leadership.
"Good diplomats never mean what they say, and never say what they mean!"
Well, that's all and good, but to which of these should Pakistanis pay attention:

^^^ Ah, that would be the million dollar question, now won't it?
It takes a diplomat to understand another diplomat, and that is why I fear Pakistan will not get the message that it should pay heed to if it is avoid adverse consequences.
Your compassion for Pakistan is boundless, but we should be equally if not more compassionate with the US, given her sacrifice in blood and treasure - If it is to avoid even greater expenditures of blood, treasure and prestige.

Now, I also think its important to take a little historical review. If you go on YouTube, you can see Sirajuddin Haqqani with President Reagan at the White House, because during the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan, the United States Government, through the CIA, funded jihadis, funded groups like the Haqqanis to cross the border or to, within Afghanistan, be part of the fight to drive the Soviets out and bring down the Soviet Union.
So when I meet for many hours, as I do, with Pakistani officials, they rightly say, Youre the ones who told us to cooperate with these people. Youre the one who funded them. Youre the ones who equipped them. Youre the ones who used them to bring down the Soviet Union by driving them out of Afghanistan. And we are now both in a situation that is highly complex and difficult to extricate ourselves from. That is how they see it.