What's new

More Trouble for Micron: China Unveils Its First Domestic DRAM Chip

antonius123

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 17, 2010
2,963
-4
4,074
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
More Trouble for Micron: China Unveils Its First Domestic DRAM Chip

The tip of an iceberg has shown up.

Leo Sun

(TMFSunLion)

Jun 16, 2019 at 12:00PM

Memory chipmaker Micron (NASDAQ:MU) lost nearly half its market value over the past 12 months as a global glut of DRAM and NAND chips crushed market prices. The decline was exacerbated by sluggish demand from smartphone, PC, and data center customers amid the escalating trade war between the U.S. and China.
Micron is the world's third-largest manufacturer of DRAM and NAND chips. The average price of DRAM chips have already been cut in half since peaking in the third quarter of 2018, and could still log double-digit declines in the third and fourth quarters, according to research group Trendforce. Even the more bullish analysts don't expect DRAM prices to improve until late 2020 -- and that might not occur if the trade war escalates.

[https://g]
IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

To make matters worse, Chinese chipmaker Changxin Memory Technologies, formerly known as Innotron Memory, recently unveiled China's first domestically designed DRAM chip. This move, aimed at countering the Trump administration's threats to cut Chinese companies off from American technologies, could seriously hurt Micron in several ways.

The tip of the iceberg has appeared

Changxin won't immediately challenge Micron and larger rivals Samsung (NASDAQOTH:SSNLF), and SK Hynix in the DRAM market. It plans to initially produce only about 10,000 wafers per month, which is a tiny capacity compared to the global monthly output of about 1.3 million wafers.
But according to Nikkei, Changxin already invested $8 billion in its DRAM operations, and it allocated up to $1.5 billion in capex for the current year. That's much lower than Micron's capex forecast of $9 billion this year, but it's more than twice the amount Nanya Technology, the world's fourth-largest DRAM maker, spent on capex last year.
Unlike its peer Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit, which was forced to halt its DRAM efforts after Washington barred its access to U.S. technologies and accused it of stealing trade secrets from Micron, Changxin uses a design based on technology from Qimonda, an affiliate of German chipmaker Infineon, which filed for bankruptcy a decade ago.
The Chinese government and other Chinese tech companies (like the besieged Huawei) could also invest in Changxin and other domestic chipmakers to accelerate the production of domestic memory chips. Doing so could eventually nullify the Trump administration's threats to cut Chinese companies off from American technologies.

[https://g]
IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

Changxin isn't the only chipmaker that could reduce China's dependence on American chipmaker. Yangtze Memory Technologies, a state-backed chipmaker, will start mass-producing NAND chips by the end of the year to challenge Samsung, Micron, Western Digital, and Toshiba.

How the iceberg could sink Micron

Declining DRAM and NAND prices caused Micron's growth to decelerate significantly over the past year.

Metric
Q2 2018
Q3 2018
Q4 2018
Q1 2019
Q2 2019
Revenue
$7.4 billion
$7.8 billion
$8.4 billion
$7.9 billion
$5.8 billion
Year-over-year growth
58%
40%
38%
16%
(21%)

DATA SOURCE: MICRON QUARTERLY REPORTS.
In the first half of fiscal 2019, Micron generated 66% of its revenue from DRAM chips, 29% from NAND chips, and the remaining 5% from other types of chips. Its total revenue fell 3% annually during that period, and analysts expect its full-year revenue to plunge 23%.
Micron generated 57% of its sales from China in 2018. It also generated 13% of its total revenue from Huawei in the first half of 2019. Micron suspended its shipments of chips to Huawei in late May in response to the Trump administration's decision to blacklist the tech giant from U.S. technologies.
This puts Micron in a painfully precarious position. If the trade war escalates and evolves into a full-blown tech war, more Chinese companies could dump Micron's chips and buy them from Samsung and other non-American chipmakers instead.
Chinese chipmakers would also accelerate their domestic chipmaking efforts, which could eventually lock foreign chipmakers out of the market. That move would also flood the market with cheap chips and eliminate any hopes for a meaningful recovery in DRAM and NAND prices.

Micron is in massive trouble

Micron generates over half its sales from China, and the trade war now puts tremendous pressure on China to reduce its dependence on foreign chipmakers. China can't ditch Micron overnight, but the appearance of domestically developed DRAM and NAND chips indicates that its days are numbered. If Micron gets locked out of China before DRAM and NAND prices recover, it could face harrowing revenue declines for years to come.



https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/06/16/more-trouble-for-micron-china-unveils-its-first-do.aspx
 
Remove Micron from Nasdaq, so it does not show up in the big market boards. :enjoy:

No problems except those swept under rug. House is clean, except the rugs are 8 feet high over pounds of dust. :lol:
 
In the not too distant future, most if not all DRAM,NAND and other chips will be produced by the Chinese only.
 
How the iceberg could sink Micron

Aahhh...Another alarmist 'could' article.

It takes at least 2-3 yrs to ramp up a fab, which includes the structural shell, the processing equipment (Western sources), the people, and the software. This is assuming NOTHING goes wrong, but the current technology trade ban is a major wrong. Realistically, more like 4-5 yrs without the current technology trade ban.

It takes approximately 3-4 months from wafer start to functional testing...

https://semiengineering.com/battling-fab-cycle-times/
For example, if a fab has 12,000 lots, and it processes 4,000 lots per month, the total cycle time is 3 months, according to KLA-Tencor.
That is just to functional testing, not yet extraction, package, and customer ship. This is also assuming nothing goes wrong in a high volume manufacturing (HVM) environment.

For a startup of any product, per wafer yield will be below market norm. This is total die yield, not die PRODUCT GRADE LEVEL (PGL) yield.

https://www.waferworld.com/wafer-manufacturing-wafer-grades/
Silicon wafers come in a variety of different quality levels. In the silicon wafer manufacturing world, these quality levels are referred to as grades. The three types of wafer grades available are prime, test, and reclaimed. Each silicon wafer grade possesses its own properties and applications. Keep reading to learn more about wafer manufacturing and these three silicon wafer grades.
Each company will have its own in-house labeling, but all companies essentially grades their products on accepted market practices: PGL1/2/3.

So for this new Chinese DRAM challenge, assume a wafer yield of 100 dies that passed functional testing, for example, most dies will be PGL3, which is usually non-shippable, some will be PGL2, which will sell to Joe Schmoe's Memory on ebay, and only a few will be PGL1, which for Tier One clients like Sony or IBM, will be dismissed. In other words, the best from this Chinese DRAM company will go to Tier Two clients. As time passes, wafer yield will increase in shippable and PGL1 dies. Because of the months long wafer cycle time, the time for this new Chinese DRAM product to be accepted on the market will be at least 4-5 yrs. Totaling nearly a decade before Changxin Memory becomes a contender to Micron.

The longer this technology trade ban goes on, the more difficult it will be for Changxin to establish itself as a major HVM source for DRAM or for any semicon product. Consumers like you and I are not interested in giving anyone a chance. We want our PCs to boot and run immediately. The NYSE or Hang Seng will not risk billions of capital on unknown DRAM in their computers. Who thinks Chengdu is going to risk its next 'stealth' fighter on DRAM from Changxin Memory?
 
Show me which business in any industry in any field that DO NOT worry about the competition. But if you are going to ask such a silly question, then why does China worry about everything?
You say there is nothing to worry about then now you tell me you worry. Which is which? I just told you, we are a weak country with no technology and capability, US will always be the best, nothing to worry about at all.
 
You say there is nothing to worry about then now you tell me you worry. Which is which? I just told you, we are a weak country with no technology and capability, US will always be the best, nothing to worry about at all.
Where did I said 'nothing to worry about'? What I did was exposed the hyperbole of the article. A Chinese forum member was an Intel Fab 68 Dalian employee, specifically in the Wet Etch area. See if you can find him and let him confirm what I posted.
 
Where did I said 'nothing to worry about'? What I did was exposed the hyperbole of the article. A Chinese forum member was an Intel Fab 68 Dalian employee, specifically in the Wet Etch area. See if you can find him and let him confirm what I posted.
So you are worried of Chinese tech?
 
I hope the DRAM price will fall significantly.

There is a cartel to maintain the DRAM price high all the time.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom