What's new

Military as an obstacle

Bang Galore

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 21, 2010
10,685
12
22,736
Country
India
Location
India
Military as an obstacle

By S. Akbar Zaidi

ACADEMICS who work on the political economy of Pakistan have no doubt in their minds that Pakistan’s military, primarily its army, remains the dominant power in any equation regarding the distribution and use of power and force in Pakistan.

Despite the recent, softer transitions in the balance and distribution of power which have created far more space for democratic government, civil society, the judiciary as well as for the media, this dominance in Pakistan’s political settlement persists. While it is very possible that there may have been some small, and probably temporary, erosion in the dominance of the military, the military nevertheless remains the hegemon.

The hegemony of the military over the state and its institutions in Pakistan is articulated in numerous ways. The most obvious, of course, is outright military dictatorship, in different guises and forms but always clearly with the military leadership ruling.

Three coups and four general-presidents have between them ruled Pakistan for almost 35 years. At these long junctures, the military both ruled and governed. In circumstances when there has been a civilian dispensation, particularly during 1988-99, the military might not have overtly governed. Clearly, though, this was the institution which held unchallengeable power over the state, including the various governments, and enforced its military rule.

In addition, numerous wings and organisations of the military, such as Military Intelligence and the ISI in particular, have dominated the political and public sphere in Pakistan. The latter has perhaps gone rogue, with a sense of independence of which even the establishment in the military might not be fully cognisant. Even in times of civilian or democratic dispensations, the ISI has played a fundamental role, both domestically and in the region.

There is consensus amongst academics and political analysts, as well as amongst the increasingly aware and astute lay public, that it is the military which continues to determine Pakistan’s Afghanistan policy, the military and political anti-Taliban policy especially regarding drone attacks, all nuclear-related issues and perhaps even foreign policy more generally. The military also plays a crucial, perhaps even exclusive, role in determining Pakistan’s position on Kashmir and India, positions which might even receive some public support. Any peace process with India must factor in these points.

Pakistan’s Kashmir and India policy has been held hostage by the military since 1948. Just as the military has directly meddled in domestic affairs undertaking coups, it has also provoked and instigated wars with India in 1965 and 1999. At other times, just as Pakistan’s military has covertly managed Pakistan’s domestic affairs, academic scholarship shows that it has also meddled in Kashmir and elsewhere in India creating, arming, training and supporting so-called jihadi organisations.

Extensive academic research on the military, as well as conventional wisdom, support the claim that one reason why the military has dominated Pakistan’s own state and its governments has been because the military continues to use the ‘India card’. The fear of India physically taking over Pakistan — perhaps a valid concern at one point but no longer so — has been exploited to its own advantage by the military for decades on end. Pakistan’s military depends on India to claim legitimacy in order to establish its own hegemony over the political economy of Pakistan. Any civilian peace process, such as the one just restarted, is hampered by this heavy burden from the past.

Some political analysts might even advocate that any India policy or peace process must factor in the military’s concerns and opinions. This is playing to the devil. This is also exactly why civilian governments have still been unable to make use of their political and democratic agency and independence, and break away from the shadows and fear of a dominating military.

If anything, and not just India-specific policies, all policies, whether foreign or domestic, must be made by civilians alone.

Military and so-called security factors need to be considered, but governments which claim legitimacy from the people are answerable to the people, not to the MI, ISI or GHQ. What is best for Pakistan and for its people must be determined by democratic and civilian governments, not by the military.

If Pakistan is to become a democracy, the ubiquitous role and position of the military in all walks of life must be put aside, once and for all. However, realignment of power between institutions takes decades, unless there is a revolution which sweeps aside old power blocs and vested interests. In the absence of any foreseeable revolution in Pakistan, these changes are going to take time but they will not happen unless civilian institutions — government, civil society, the judiciary — enforce their writ on the military and take away from the military what it perceives to be its terrain and its prerogatives: India, Kashmir, nuclear policy, Afghanistan and so on.

In an environment where power continues to lie with the military, any peace process with India, as well as attempts at democratisation in Pakistan, will fail. For those who want peace in South Asia and better relations among all countries, the hegemony of the military within Pakistan will have to be challenged. Not only will this be good for the region but, and most importantly, it will be good for the people of Pakistan. It will also certainly strengthen democracy in the process.

The writer is a political economist.

Military as an obstacle | Opinion | DAWN.COM
 
Some political analysts might even advocate that any India policy or peace process must factor in the military’s concerns and opinions. This is playing to the devil. This is also exactly why civilian governments have still been unable to make use of their political and democratic agency and independence, and break away from the shadows and fear of a dominating military.
Nothing will change as Pakistani politicians don't have the balls to confront the Army/ISI and send them packing to their barracks.

Well, another reason why the PA doesn't want to loosen their stranglehold is due to their commercial interests. No one dares question them now. But if power is handed over to the democratically elected government, then their empire would go bust! Take a look at this report that appeared on BBC....

Pakistan's government has said the country's powerful armed forces run a total of 55 businesses. Defence Minister Rao Sikander Iqbal was responding to a question in the Senate tabled by the opposition Pakistan People's Party. The army's commercial ventures ranged from small bakeries to huge industrial establishments, the minister said. Pakistani politicians are deeply critical of the armed forces' steadily increasing business interests.

Mr Iqbal said most of the businesses were controlled by three trusts working under the armed forces. These trusts include the Fauji Foundation (managed by the army), the Shaheen Foundation (managed by the air force) and the Bahria Foundation (managed by the navy). Mr Iqbal told the Senate in a written reply that these businesses included fertilizer and sugar factories. The army also has business interests in the energy and banking sectors, and in leasing, insurance, travel, pharmacies, gas stations, security and textiles, among others.

PPP senator Farhatullah Babar, who had tabled the question, told BBC news: Opposition parties in Pakistan have repeatedly alleged that the armed forces' commercial interests are taking a toll on their professional commitments and capabilities.


So then, does anyone think the PA will voluntarily renounce power and with it their commercial interests? While millions live below the poverty line, the Army/Navy/Airforce brass whiz around in Mercs, Audies, Bentleys, BMWs and fancy SUVs! Life's good, what?! :woot:
 
Nothing will change as Pakistani politicians don't have the balls to confront the Army/ISI and send them packing to their barracks.
Nothing will change unless Pakistani public understand that Democracy is not a Jadoo ki chadi for the disapperance of their problems.Corrupt persons can come to power in any form of government. be it is a democracy, military/dictatorship,communist or even caliphate(which many of our Pakistani posters here think will solve every problem they have from corruption to curing cancer).but democracy is the only one where u will have the right to kick the corrupt out every few years.
 
I thought bharatis had no concerns or didn't care about Pakistan's internal problems?
 
Nothing will change as Pakistani politicians don't have the balls to confront the Army/ISI and send them packing to their barracks.

Well, another reason why the PA doesn't want to loosen their stranglehold is due to their commercial interests. No one dares question them now. But if power is handed over to the democratically elected government, then their empire would go bust! Take a look at this report that appeared on BBC....

Pakistan's government has said the country's powerful armed forces run a total of 55 businesses. Defence Minister Rao Sikander Iqbal was responding to a question in the Senate tabled by the opposition Pakistan People's Party. The army's commercial ventures ranged from small bakeries to huge industrial establishments, the minister said. Pakistani politicians are deeply critical of the armed forces' steadily increasing business interests.

Mr Iqbal said most of the businesses were controlled by three trusts working under the armed forces. These trusts include the Fauji Foundation (managed by the army), the Shaheen Foundation (managed by the air force) and the Bahria Foundation (managed by the navy). Mr Iqbal told the Senate in a written reply that these businesses included fertilizer and sugar factories. The army also has business interests in the energy and banking sectors, and in leasing, insurance, travel, pharmacies, gas stations, security and textiles, among others.

PPP senator Farhatullah Babar, who had tabled the question, told BBC news: Opposition parties in Pakistan have repeatedly alleged that the armed forces' commercial interests are taking a toll on their professional commitments and capabilities.


So then, does anyone think the PA will voluntarily renounce power and with it their commercial interests? While millions live below the poverty line, the Army/Navy/Airforce brass whiz around in Mercs, Audies, Bentleys, BMWs and fancy SUVs! Life's good, what?! :woot:

Ignorance is a bliss, Pakistan's Fauji foundation is Pakistan's largest tax payer and gives Pakistan a profit of US$ 661 Million per Annum. Over 70% of all employees are civilians and the rest are retired Army men. If they are doing such a good job, what reason do we have to complain ?
 
I thought bharatis had no concerns or didn't care about Pakistan's internal problems?

It is cause of concern when if any agreement reached with civilian gov in Pakistan will need final approval of Pakistani military establishment.Also, most wars against us were actually started by Pakistani army sometimes without the knowledge of the gov.
 
Nothing will change as Pakistani politicians don't have the balls to confront the Army/ISI and send them packing to their barracks.

Well, another reason why the PA doesn't want to loosen their stranglehold is due to their commercial interests. No one dares question them now. But if power is handed over to the democratically elected government, then their empire would go bust! Take a look at this report that appeared on BBC....

Pakistan's government has said the country's powerful armed forces run a total of 55 businesses. Defence Minister Rao Sikander Iqbal was responding to a question in the Senate tabled by the opposition Pakistan People's Party. The army's commercial ventures ranged from small bakeries to huge industrial establishments, the minister said. Pakistani politicians are deeply critical of the armed forces' steadily increasing business interests.

Mr Iqbal said most of the businesses were controlled by three trusts working under the armed forces. These trusts include the Fauji Foundation (managed by the army), the Shaheen Foundation (managed by the air force) and the Bahria Foundation (managed by the navy). Mr Iqbal told the Senate in a written reply that these businesses included fertilizer and sugar factories. The army also has business interests in the energy and banking sectors, and in leasing, insurance, travel, pharmacies, gas stations, security and textiles, among others.

PPP senator Farhatullah Babar, who had tabled the question, told BBC news: Opposition parties in Pakistan have repeatedly alleged that the armed forces' commercial interests are taking a toll on their professional commitments and capabilities.


So then, does anyone think the PA will voluntarily renounce power and with it their commercial interests? While millions live below the poverty line, the Army/Navy/Airforce brass whiz around in Mercs, Audies, Bentleys, BMWs and fancy SUVs! Life's good, what?! :woot:

My friend, come to Pakistan and see what Fauji Foundation is. Cement industry, Schools, Colleges, Medical Colleges and all other things created for the benefit of the retired army man, and civilians. The bakeries are placed in cantts and by living in a military cantonment all my life, i can tell you that the bakeries and other schemes are a great benefit for the army man.

And the biggest thing is, they dont go TAX FREE!!!:disagree:

Another propaganda against the military. These politicians could not forge a better foreign policy at the moment. They will give issues away in an instant. An exmple is the building of the Kishnganga dam by India, the political leadership is doing nothing on the matter. military is not involved in this matter. Karachi, military is not involved there.

Truth of fact is that whenever there is a problem in Pakistan , the military is there. The floods, 2005 earthquake, yesterdays building collapse in karachi, Law and terror situation, And now even there are calls for Army to be brought in Karachi and to reinforce the SC decision regarding Corruption of politicians. (although you could arhue that due to non-presence of good police and aid teams military is called in, but still)

And why is an indian so worried??:undecided:
 
Nothing will change as Pakistani politicians don't have the balls to confront the Army/ISI and send them packing to their barracks.

Well, another reason why the PA doesn't want to loosen their stranglehold is due to their commercial interests. No one dares question them now. But if power is handed over to the democratically elected government, then their empire would go bust! Take a look at this report that appeared on BBC....

Pakistan's government has said the country's powerful armed forces run a total of 55 businesses. Defence Minister Rao Sikander Iqbal was responding to a question in the Senate tabled by the opposition Pakistan People's Party. The army's commercial ventures ranged from small bakeries to huge industrial establishments, the minister said. Pakistani politicians are deeply critical of the armed forces' steadily increasing business interests.

Mr Iqbal said most of the businesses were controlled by three trusts working under the armed forces. These trusts include the Fauji Foundation (managed by the army), the Shaheen Foundation (managed by the air force) and the Bahria Foundation (managed by the navy). Mr Iqbal told the Senate in a written reply that these businesses included fertilizer and sugar factories. The army also has business interests in the energy and banking sectors, and in leasing, insurance, travel, pharmacies, gas stations, security and textiles, among others.

PPP senator Farhatullah Babar, who had tabled the question, told BBC news: Opposition parties in Pakistan have repeatedly alleged that the armed forces' commercial interests are taking a toll on their professional commitments and capabilities.


So then, does anyone think the PA will voluntarily renounce power and with it their commercial interests? While millions live below the poverty line, the Army/Navy/Airforce brass whiz around in Mercs, Audies, Bentleys, BMWs and fancy SUVs! Life's good, what?! :woot:

I actually wanted to reply to this but realized, i have on many occasions replied to idiotic posts like these so no point in replying to a troll :rolleyes:
 
Ignorance is a bliss, Pakistan's Fauji foundation is Pakistan's largest tax payer and gives Pakistan a profit of US$ 661 Million per Annum. Over 70% of all employees are civilians and the rest are retired Army men. If they are doing such a good job, what reason do we have to complain ?

They make the civilian government run enterprises look bad ....

The largest civilian run PSE's lose over $3 billion annually ....
 
In an environment where power continues to lie with the military, any peace process with India, as well as attempts at democratisation in Pakistan, will fail. For those who want peace in South Asia and better relations among all countries, the hegemony of the military within Pakistan will have to be challenged. Not only will this be good for the region but, and most importantly, it will be good for the people of Pakistan. It will also certainly strengthen democracy in the process.

Absolutely agree that the civilian government should hold all power over policy - but to do that the civilian government has to win the trust of the people - a good example to follow would be that of the AKP in Turkey - i.e good governance, economic growth and low corruption.

'Power over all policy making' won't just fall into the civvies lap while they keep acting as they are.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom