MiG-35 promo

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Based on MiG-29, except twin seat and wingspan increased to 12 meters. America counterpart is F-18.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

@pakistanipower @nahtanbob @gambit @vostok @F-22Raptor

 

[Ultima Thule]

Based on MiG-29, except twin seat and wingspan increased to 12 meters. America counterpart is F-18.

Both F-16 and F-18 @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Both F-16 and F-18 @undertakerwwefan

Nop. If Russia ever makes a single engine fighter powered by AL-31 that be counterpart of F-16. RD-33 is counterpart of F404 / 414, not F110. So MiG-29 / 35 can't be counterpart of F-16.

 

[Imran Khan]

its a mig-29 with few changes

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

its a mig-29 with few changes

Sort of like F-18E compared to F-18A/C.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Nop. If Russia ever makes a single engine fighter powered by AL-31 that be counterpart of F-16. RD-33 is counterpart of F404 / 414, not F110. So MiG-29 / 35 can't be counterpart of F-16.

in weight class is more similar to F-16 rather than F-18 @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

in weight class is more similar to F-16 rather than F-18 @undertakerwwefan

Maybe. But it's not about weight. US don't use frigates and diesel subs like Russia does. Not everything has a counterpart.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Sort of like F-18E compared to F-18A/C.

main things common for both F-18E/F and Mig-35 is avionics+radar upgrades with relatively minor air-frame changes @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

main things common for both F-18E/F and Mig-35 is avionics+radar upgrades with relatively minor air-frame changes @undertakerwwefan

Yes. And sort of like Gripen E compared to Gripen A/C.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Maybe. But it's not about weight. US don't use frigates and diesel subs like Russia does. Not everything has a counterpart.

Both F-16/Mig-29 had been emerged as lightweight fighter jets, with complementary of F-15/Su-27, and Mig-29 has no naval role, carrier operations, hence its has similar land based F-16, and by the way what is the advantages of diesel subs and frigates @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Both F-16/Mig-29 had been emerged as lightweight fighter jets, with complementary of F-15/Su-27, and Mig-29 has no naval role, carrier operations, hence its has similar land based F-16, and by the way what is the advantages of diesel subs and frigates @undertakerwwefan

MiG-29K is ship version. F-16 has no ship version.

what is the advantages of diesel subs and frigates @undertakerwwefan

Frigates are smaller. Diesel subs are quieter than nuclear subs.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Yes. And sort of like Gripen E compared to Gripen A/C.

But F-18E/F has more air-frame changes than Mig-35, like air intake changes, nose changes, vertical tail changes etc etc @undertakerwwefan

MiG-29 K is ship version. F-16 has no ship version.

recently only for Indian navy (export), not manufacturing country has (Russia) @undertakerwwefan sick:

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

recently only for Indian navy (export), not manufacturing country has (Russia) @undertakerwwefan sick:

Russia navy uses MiG-29K. You see the Russia navy flag on this one.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Frigates are smaller. Diesel subs are quieter than nuclear subs.

(Frigates) hence it has a less weapons as compare to Destroyers, and its has no long range weapons like destroyer does like long range SAMs/torpedoes/Sonars etc etc and after expanding its weapons, it is easy target to enemy weapons and as for Subs what a laughter you have @undertakerwwefan Nuclear subs is far far more quiter than diesel Subs, do research before you bark here @undertakerwwefan