Which Embrader variant we are getting for this?
This one?
![]()
I think SAAB Erieye use the same platform which was delivered to PAF.
the variant may look like these
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which Embrader variant we are getting for this?
This one?
![]()
I think SAAB Erieye use the same platform which was delivered to PAF.
tehalka is like diwali patakha which dont bursts but fizzles like pokhran nukes where buddha was suppose to smile.![]()
Yes it does not...because there is no space in it. it is as simple as that. it is an AEW&C not an AEWC&C
Still such arrangement has blindspots. the least they should do is is to copy the arrangement of Phalcon.
Then it needs a bigger platform. And is going to cost a lot more. It will become a true AWACS then. But doing so will increase the cost by atleast twice. We have a large area to cover and hence the Blade shaped antenna is far effective in raising numbers..the Five Phalcons complemented by these will be a better solution.
Radar:
The A50 today uses a fixed dome with triangular radar arrays, that offers full 360° radar detection, so without blind spots, although the overlapping areas should have not the same detection range.
The DRDO system uses a twin array which offers detection to the sides only, that means it will fly alongside the borders and will use overlapping flightpaths to cover the other areas.
! look at the scale model below, do you see a bulge on the side of the fuselage above the wing root, that is a conformal antenna, other conformal antenna arrays located around the aircraft will provide better coverage than is possible with Erieye.
..wrong as usual! look at the scale model below, do you see a bulge on the side of the fuselage above the wing root, that is a conformal antenna, other conformal antenna arrays located around the aircraft will provide better coverage than is possible with Erieye.
![]()
You meant to say DRDO AWACS is better than Erieye??
She meant there will be more coverage and reduced blind spots. Not better than Erieye.
And Happy new year Kathy.
That is the prime role of a AWACS, isn't it? if it is giving more coverage than Erieye, then it is definitely better than Erieye. Ya of course because of less space and man power, it might be not as operational and self sufficient as a command control system as Erieye is.
look at the scale model below, do you see a bulge on the side of the fuselage above the wing root, that is a conformal antenna, other conformal antenna arrays located around the aircraft will provide better coverage than is possible with Erieye.
Yes, as usual you have no idea what you are talking about:
The AEW&C is expected to have a 60 degree blind spot in both front and back. IAF can have 360 degree coverage with 3 antenna combination instead of 2 antennas side by side, but, that means pushing the deliveries further. It will be looked at a further date.

LOLYes, as usual you have no idea what you are talking about:
Interferometer arrays, not radar arrays!
http://www.defence.pk/forums/1406226-post2.html
I can't count the times anymore that I corrected your false claims.![]()

She meant there will be more coverage and reduced blind spots. Not better than Erieye.
And Happy new year Kathy.
