What's new

London attack: 130 imams condemn attackers and refuse to perform funeral prayer for them

What can I say man? In their mind, you need to speak and dress in a certain way to be considered a Muslim.

Most of the problems of today's Iran is because it is at odds with Israel. Why? Because it is trying to defend a Muslim nation called Palestine or it is helping Lebanon defend itself against Israel. All these problems would go away, if Iran announced tomorrow that it would recognize Israel as a sovereign nation.

And is it because Iran is a Muslim country trying to help another Muslim nation? No, in their mind, Iran is just following its agenda of reviving the Persian Empire! The only problem is that from that perspective, Israel would become Iran's natural ally!

There is no arguing with these people.
 
having a beard is clearly someone's efforts to blend in with the kaffir
Right, so you grew a beard to blend in with the kuffar Sikhs. Bad boy, bad boy shave it please.

Sikh-Holy-Man.jpg
 
Cos the Elites wish to further the Clash...

Here you are accusing the government of collusion and conspiracy and your fellow poster says people without beards can be considered kaafir - and you wonder how these scum got away with spreading excrement all these years?.

Freedom of speech is a rare privilege in this world and these guys abused it.

The police' fault is that they failed to foresee the step up from talk to action and it's regrettable. But let's be clear, the ones that need to be confronted are the perpetrators, their enablers and the disgusting [armchair] imams who support them.
 
Here you are accusing the government of collusion and conspiracy and your fellow poster says people without beards can be considered kaafir - and you wonder how these scum got away with spreading excrement all these years?.

Freedom of speech is a rare privilege in this world and these guys abused it.

The police' fault is that they failed to foresee the step up from talk to action and it's regrettable. But let's be clear, the ones that need to be confronted are the perpetrators, their enablers and the disgusting [armchair] imams who support them.
Agreed those who support those murderers are disgusting as well.
 
Here you are accusing the government of collusion and conspiracy and your fellow poster says people without beards can be considered kaafir - and you wonder how these scum got away with spreading excrement all these years?.

Freedom of speech is a rare privilege in this world and these guys abused it.

The police' fault is that they failed to foresee the step up from talk to action and it's regrettable. But let's be clear, the ones that need to be confronted are the perpetrators, their enablers and the disgusting [armchair] imams who support them.
And those who let it happen need to be confronted as well. It ain't the Police.

Does the fact that I say that 9/11 was a false flag mean I condone those attacks? No. So in the same vein suggesting that there are traitors in the British state who willfully let these crazies roam around does not mean I condone these attacks.

It is fact that the these attacks further a dialectical Clash which is not in the interests of any save those who want Imposter Israel to become the next ruling state. There are traitors at the highest level of British State...

The Big Brother state will use these attacks to pass legislation to curb any websites that give alternate views on history, politics, economics etc, not just ISIS type material.

Oh by the way NATO has been supporting these sorts of terrorists in trying to overthrow governments around the world. Who says this? President Putin.
 
Last edited:
Right, so you grew a beard to blend in with the kuffar Sikhs. Bad boy, bad boy shave it please.

Sikh-Holy-Man.jpg

The Sikhs don't trim their beards at all, Muslims do. So your argument falls flat on its face.

Also, the majority of the kuffar don't grow beards. What matters is the majority, not the minority.

And they where a different style of turban, making us look all the more different.

Cousin man
He said a Muslim without a beards are kaafir

He said he'd murder his own mother if needed

He killed innocent people

Now tell all what Allah swt says about killing innocents and mothers role in islaam ?

I already told you, that beard claim is extreme but not without basis. So it doesn't count.

What did his mother say to make him say that?

As for killing of innocents, that doesn't make someone a kharijite either, especially if their enemy is killing their innocent people.

Khurram Butt, who doesn't know him? One of Andy's crowd. The only thing he was good at was declaring someone Kafir. His favourite words were, in order, "Kafir", "Murtad", "Taghut" or "Munafiq".

@waz I see you were also well versed with him, how many times did he use these words in a sentence? 10 times? Didn't he also call his parents Munafiq?



@waz And we already have our first defender of the terrorist.



I hope you don't visit the U.K often.

He's not a khariijite. That's all I said. I didn't defend him so don't accuse me of such, it makes you look dumb.

I visit the UK often, sorry to disappoint you.
 
The Sikhs don't trim their beards at all, Muslims do. So your argument falls flat on its face.

Also, the majority of the kuffar don't grow beards. What matters is the majority, not the minority.

And they where a different style of turban, making us look all the more different.



I already told you, that beard claim is extreme but not without basis. So it doesn't count.

What did his mother say to make him say that?

As for killing of innocents, that doesn't make someone a kharijite either, especially if their enemy is killing their innocent people.



He's not a khariijite. That's all I said. I didn't defend him so don't accuse me of such, it makes you look dumb.

I visit the UK often, sorry to disappoint you.

Your missing out the punishment his going to get for killing innocents
You do know what that is don't you ?

and isn't paradise at the feet of ones mother ? You do know what this means
 
And those who let it happen need to be confronted as well. It ain't the Police.

Does the fact that I say that 9/11 was a false flag mean I condone those attacks? No. So in the same vein suggesting that there are traitors in the British state who willfully let these crazies roam around does not mean I condone these attacks.

It is fact that the these attacks further a dialectical Clash which is not in the interests of any save those who want Imposter Israel to become the next ruling state. There are traitors at the highest level of British State...

The Big Brother state will use these attacks to pass legislation to curb any websites that give alternate views on history, politics, economics etc, not just ISIS type material.

Oh by the way NATO has been supporting these sorts of terrorists in trying to overthrow governments around the world. Who says this? President Putin.

At least you accept that these crazies exist. Yesterday the 'crazies' were UK police in disguise. Tomorrow you may realise that the world is a chaotic place and it's virtually impossible to eliminate every individual threat.

At that point you may realise that actually your thoughts should be with the victims at this time because whatever your beef, no one should ever target civilians.
 
And those who let it happen need to be confronted as well. It ain't the Police.

It is fact that the these attacks further a dialectical Clash which is not in the interests of any save those who want Imposter Israel to become the next ruling state. There are traitors at the highest level of British State...
At least you accept that these crazies exist. Yesterday the 'crazies' were UK police in disguise. Tomorrow you may realise that the world is a chaotic place and it's virtually impossible to eliminate every individual threat.

At that point you may realise that actually your thoughts should be with the victims at this time because whatever your beef, no one should ever target civilians.
I agree no one should target civilians including NATO and her proxy terrorists in the ME as well as these ISIS affiliates in the UK.
Thoughts go out to the victims and their families but one should not shut down his critical thinking mind due to emotion. We owe it to the victims that all involved should be brought to justice and if that means there are traitors higher up who are willfully ignoring these crazies so that it achieves certain strategic objectives, then they should also be brought to account.

These attacks ain't happening randomly. Someone is benefitting immensely...with a Clash that is unfortunately ever drawing nigh.
 
Here you are accusing the government of collusion and conspiracy and your fellow poster says people without beards can be considered kaafir - and you wonder how these scum got away with spreading excrement all these years?.

Freedom of speech is a rare privilege in this world and these guys abused it.

The police' fault is that they failed to foresee the step up from talk to action and it's regrettable. But let's be clear, the ones that need to be confronted are the perpetrators, their enablers and the disgusting [armchair] imams who support them.
Also there is no such thing as complete freedom of speech in the UK or E.U. Try discussing the discrepancies in the Offical version of WW II and see if you have a job left.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom