Also Lee Kuan Yew attributed HK businessmen as rent seekers.
**********************
http://www.ejinsight.com/20150121-lee-kuan-yew-lessons-for-hong-kong/
But he regretted the fact that the second and third generations of their families have lost their heads in a rush to reap quick property gains since the 1990s.
Lee mentioned Li Ka-shing in one interview and pointed out that Li’s conglomerate was unable to create a single hit product that could be sold worldwide.
Li’s business empire of real estate, ports, supermarkets, telecommunications firms and public utilities was just built on “following the trends to enter the most profitable sectors rather than foresight or innovation”, he said.
Lee’s remarks can sometimes be slightly off the mark, but looking at Hong Kong’s economic fundamentals, it’s safe to say that outside the property sector, the city has very little to show in the way of prize assets on a global scale.
Many offspring of the city’s business titans — usually resourceful and well educated — choose to remain in the comfort zone of the property sector, when they should have leveraged their capabilities to venture into new domains.
The Hong Kong economy as a whole is thus encumbered with the periodical vicissitudes of the property sector, while Singapore has cultivated vibrant pharmaceutical, electronics, oil refining and petrochemical industries at its carefully planned Jurong Industrial Estate and adjoining artificial island.
He cites Anson Chan Fang On-sang, the first post-handover chief secretary, who resigned from her post in 2001, as an example to support his contention that any attempt to shield Hong Kong from Beijing’s interference, to reason with Beijing for more democracy or to preserve the colonial way of doing things is bound to be futile.
The writing was already on the wall when the Union Jack came down in 1997.