No you haven't provided any evidence as to how you achieved your objectives in any of the Indo Pak wars other than some refuted articles. In 1947 you attempted to annex a sovereign country with British support, but you only managed to get 1/3 of it before the Indian Army arrived and kicked you out. 1965 began wth you attempting to take back Kashmir, it ended with you barely being able to defend Lahore after losing 1000 km of territory. In 1999 you lost many strategic points and got kicked out of Kargil sector after suffering a major military defeat at Tiger Hill. Despite supposedly capturing point 5363 which was not even occupied at the time, you still lost important peaks to India and most importantly failed to take the Siachen highway. And it was YOUR Prime Minister who ran to Bill Clinton.
And I have presented unbiased analyses from neutral sources including military historians, South Asian historians, and the world's most respected research agency(The Library of congress) that prove you wrong. Pf course, you refused to look at them.
And yes you did frustrate me that you managed to turn what should have been a non-controversial article into another debate where you try to spread your false narrative of Pakistani victories in all Indo-Pak Wars, and all that garbage about Muslims taking over India. If you want to call that a victory, congratulations.