What's new

Kashmir Violence Tests Modi's Promise of 'Muscular' Foreign Policy

MEDIA..............NOT MY MEDIA...........WESTERN MEDIA..............

Now u can call it YAHOODI SAAZISH. I mite buy it. Used to it u see. He He.

Also...............one of ur journalist came on some newz show of ours. Geo or Duniya I assume. Not sure. It was very clear from his words that they were not given permission to air certain reports and hence asked to blackout.

Now again, U can call these channel traitors or Anti Pak.

Point is, thing that matters is FACTS ON GROUND and rest all is rhetoric.

I would like to get a report from International journalists, reporting from LoC from IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir side.
 
Pakistan has learned something after 99 i.e diplomacy. Although Pakistan won 99 war militarily but lost it diplomatically as the whole world stood against it. Now insignificant Indians can call it "running to the UN" but it does not bother Pakistan a bit.

Americans are not bombing Pakistan but are helping Pakistan killing those Indian RAW sponsored terrorist swines of TTP. It is now no more hidden that all those drones act after Pakistan's green light.

It is strange that it took Pakistan 5 decades to learn diplomacy, but for all your new found 'diplomatic parlance'.. why is the world still ignoring you?
 
Ab yaar. they r doing it from our side. Will they be allowed on from ur side? Ur own media is refrained, then what bout western?

I repeat, Show me International journalists reporting from LoC on IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir side.

Whats Maqbooza kashmir,did not find in google maps

That's not my fault.
MK.jpg


It is strange that it took Pakistan 5 decades to learn diplomacy, but for all your new found 'diplomatic parlance'.. why is the world still ignoring you?

Read Robert Frisk's Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir and India.
 
Read Robert Frisk's Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir and India.

LOL..so basically you have no answer..start suggesting some obscure book to get out of the conversation.

My question is simple, if Pakistanis have achieved such excellence in diplomacy and approached UN for an intervention for the third time...why is UN chief ignoring Pakistani appeals asking you to resolve the difference bilaterally?

UN chief calls for India-Pakistan dialogue -
bdnews24.com


No I do agree with you, that Pakistan's leaders have approached UN many times. And this is because Pakistan leaders are not aggressive neither they ever tried to be a Muscle men.

Well the days have been well past away when Pakistani leaders used to approach US for intervention and help! If Pakistan gets an aggressor Leader, than there will be no UN and no US to whom Pakistani Government could run and ask for help!

As far as American bombings are concerned, they are helping Pakistani troops against insurgents in recent operations. (Calling yourselves wise will reduce your ability to think straight, find the facts and visit the places, this is the only way to find out a truth, Patriotism is a good thing, but a blind fool can create a chaos in Societies)

Yes I agree with you Pakistani leaders are not aggressive in face of aggression..otherwise they are pretty aggressive as far fingering a 'nation minding its own business' is concerned(reminds me of Kargil)..Once the other nation hits back, Pakistani leaders go scurrying to US/UN.
 
Last edited:
Ohh Maqbooza...........Samajhne mein tym lag gaya. Khatarnaak Urdu. :D

Ruk Bhai. Deta hoon. Dhoondna padega. It was not many days before when I was watching that show on primetym with Pak journalist as guest.

Apne Doordarshan ke Urdu news pe bhi Maqbooza Kashmir bolte hain Azad Kashmir ke liye. :buba_phone:
 
MAQBOOZA matlab Occupied. OK. Someone tell me. How is J&K with its Autonomous status in a federal structure with their own dedicated constitution is Mabooza and not independent whereas the so called AZAD KAshmir, which is run by Islamabad appointed heads, independent?

I mean logically it doesnt fit.
 
LOL..so basically you have no answer..start suggesting some obscure book to get out of the conversation.

My question is simple, if Pakistanis have achieved such excellence in diplomacy and approached UN for an intervention for the third time...why is UN chief ignoring Pakistani appeals asking you to resolve the difference bilaterally?





Yes I agree with you Pakistani leaders are not aggressive in face of aggression..otherwise they are pretty aggressive as far fingering a 'nation minding its own business' is concerned(reminds me of Kargil)..Once the other nation hits back, Pakistani leaders go scurrying to US/UN.

I suppose you are one of those who sits at home have vegetarian food and scratch there buds, if you believe or not we are not aggressors, this is the only reason we always seek for a conflict resolution via dialogues.
Just think about it for once, let say we also become aggressive, what will than happen? Do you know? Do you even have any clue what CTBT is? and that Pakistan hasn't signed it yet! I suppose not, as i said earlier, Patriotism is a good thing, but a blind fool can create a chaos in Societies!
 
I suppose you are one of those who sits at home have vegetarian food and scratch there buds, if you believe or not we are not aggressors, this is the only reason we always seek for a conflict resolution via dialogues.
Just think about it for once, let say we also become aggressive, what will than happen? Do you know? Do you even have any clue what CTBT is? and that Pakistan hasn't signed it yet! I suppose not, as i said earlier, Patriotism is a good thing, but a blind fool can create a chaos in Societies!
Dont confuse yourself with CTBT ..If you not signed it then conduct another nuclear test ..who cares ?
 
So maqboooza kashmir is IOK or Indian Occupied kashmir or is it both

Yea, Maqbooza Kashmir = IOK/Indian Occupied Kashmir.

LOL..so basically you have no answer..start suggesting some obscure book to get out of the conversation.

My question is simple, if Pakistanis have achieved such excellence in diplomacy and approached UN for an intervention for the third time...why is UN chief ignoring Pakistani appeals asking you to resolve the difference bilaterally?

Why the world is ignoring Pakistan's and Kashmir's appeal against Indian occupation & terrorism because they need India for now. They see India as counter balance to rising China.

I can't spoon feed everything to you like a d@ddy, reason why I told you to read Robert Frisk's "Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir and India".
 
Notice the interesting part - indian establishment and and media are hell bent to create wadge between Pakistan defense and civil administration and don't even recognize sovereign Pakistani govt exists. Whatever internal relation exists inside pakistan that should Pakistan internal matter. How could one take india seriously when it does not even recognize other sovereignty?
 
Yea, Maqbooza Kashmir = IOK/Indian Occupied Kashmir.



Why the world is ignoring Pakistan's and Kashmir's appeal against Indian occupation & terrorism because they need India for now. They see India as counter balance to rising China.

I can't spoon feed everything to you like a d@ddy, reason why I told you to read Robert Frisk's "Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir and India".

Well then you are in bout of bad luck as the world would need India for the foreseeable future.

But how about when the world did not need India...and India was a part of NAM, where as Pakistanis were part of Baghdad Pact, SEATO and CENTO organisations...and sitting right in middle of American laps...what could you do about Kashmir then..on top of it you ended up losing half your country?
Moral of the story is, whether the world needs you or it needs us..you can not rest Kashmir from us.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom