StormBreaker
SENIOR MEMBER
Oh man. Looks like no hardpoints have been increased![]()
It’s upsetting as well,



Abhi se itne hopeless ?
Comeon, keep your hopes high, we will see a beast insha’Allah
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh man. Looks like no hardpoints have been increased![]()
It’s upsetting as well,



I think hard points are more important in a bomber role. For Air superiority 7 hard points are enough. My personal view though.so only 7 Hard Points![]()
Up until now all the internal news from high up sources turns out to be fake on this forum. .While our internal sources told us Block 3 would have widened intakes..
Laa lo chitar tay paa lo lamyaan.
This is sir .Please tell me there isn't going to be 56 pages of discussion about a model plane?
Couple of things:
where are all those members who were making fun of windjammer when he first reported Block 3 was tested.
certain “seniors” were mocking when I posted that the person in China confirmed the test flight ......
guess what I have more info about ASEA.
Pakistan has still not decided or settled for one. The reason being is that it depends on a lot of factors including real testing in a real flying plane. This will still take a while. Nothing is etched in stone. Pakistan will evaluate three different radars in real life scenarios and decide.
as for for the additional hard points , the important factor is how much more additional weight this plane can carry not how many more hard points can be added. You can add multiple racks and still carry more weapons.
There is no news of internal IRST installed.
2 will be use for fuel tanks, so remaining 5 hard points will carry weapons. That's why thunder need at least 9 hard pointsI think hard points are more important in a bomber role. For Air superiority 7 hard points are enough. My personal view though.
I never said that..... you cannot select something without testing. They have narrowed it down and all integration/operational tests are done..... you need to fly and prove everything as claimed ...until then wait.
So we will have to wait for another half decade to get things working... EehhI never said that..... you cannot select something without testing. They have narrowed it down and all integration/operational tests are done..... you need to fly and prove everything as claimed ...until then wait.
So we will have to wait for another half decade to get things working... Eehh
PAF has to consider two things: performance and cost.So this Block 3 will be without AESA
Man they’ve had all these years to test one out and stuff.
Or canopy?A Clear POC may disclose something that why marked ??
View attachment 595734
Looking at it it may hide IRST ? A
New weapon under wings ??
Pod under intake ?
What else ?
Good observationsThe spine has changed - more in keeping with F-16 Block 52
Nose looks hiding the AESA