What's new

Japan to take part in India-U.S. naval exercises again

Pak_Sher

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 14, 2010
2,931
-1
2,031
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
The Malabar series will be held in April off the Okinawa coast

The Japanese Navy will take part, for the second year running, in the joint naval exercises by India and the United States. These will be held off the Okinawa coast, which has the highest concentration of U.S. Marines in the region.

The Malabar series of exercises, from April 2 to 10, will include Japanese ships, in keeping with the growing proximity, in a wide variety of spheres, between New Delhi and Tokyo, said government sources.

India had stopped involving more countries in the Indo-U.S. exercises after China, in 2007, sent demarches to all the participants of a five-nation naval exercise held in the Bay of Bengal. With last year's Japanese participation raising no political storm, India was once again agreeable to the idea of allowing the Japanese Maritime Self Defence Force to participate.

The sources said that as India was keen, following the acquisition of marine heavy-lift capabilities, to engage with the U.S. Marines, the Pentagon agreed to have one such exercise off Okinawa.

The sources also pointed to the presence of the Chief of Staff of the Japanese Ground Self Defence Force, General Yoshifumi Hibako in the country and to the recent visits to Japan made by the Indian Chiefs of the Navy and the Air Force.

“We have had all the three service chiefs meeting each other in six months.”

Japanese interest in developing a robust defence cooperative arrangement with India comes even as a National Defence Programme Guidelines, released recently, mentions three countries as rising powers. Japan has a tense relationship with China and is still negotiating a peace treaty with Russia. India is the only country with which it does not have security issues.

“It is extremely difficult for countries to individually deal with global security challenges such as access to seas, outer space and cyber space. With India, we are looking for more maritime cooperation, which, needless to say, Japan requires, as it is a trading nation. Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief is the other area,” said the sources.

Framed after a gap of seven years and a failed attempt by the former Prime Minister, Yukio Hatoyama, the guidelines bring India into sharp focus. After mentioning the U.S. and the Association of Southwest Asian Nations (ASEAN), its traditional parameters, the guidelines state that Japan must increase its cooperation with India and other countries that share the common interest of enhancing the security of maritime navigation from Africa to the Middle East to East Asia. By entering into a closer bilateral security relationship, India could, in future, get access to platforms and technologies that Japan had made its priorities in the defence arena, such as maritime patrol, air defence, response to ballistic missiles, transportation and command communications.

The sources also drew attention to the greater importance to be given to India — as was reflected in two key speeches, made by Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan, on diplomacy, and Minister for Foreign Affairs Seiji Maehara's address to the Diet. In Mr. Kan's speech, India figured in four out of Japan's five foreign policy pillars while in Mr. Maehara's address, India, though mentioned, was ranked below several other countries with whom Japan wants to strengthen relations.

The previous attempt to institutionalise a U.S. allies-plus India naval exercises had been abandoned after it drew fire from China. In 2007, a massive Malabar series exercise was held in the Bay of Bengal with the participation of the navies of India, the U.S., Singapore, Australia and Japan. The Left parties held demonstrations on the eastern coast. The issuance of demarches by China to all participants saw Australia, then under the Prime Ministership of Kevin Rudd, breaking ranks. This was followed by other countries also agreeing to go slow on the concept. But the uproar saw Defence Minister A.K. Antony denying any move towards creating a military bloc. “It's only an exercise,” he had said.

According to the U.S. Navy, the aim of the exercise is to “strengthen the stability of the Pacific Region,” but India denies this, deeming it simply as a learning exercise for the Indian Navy. The Navy will concentrate on aspects such as anti-submarine warfare, surface warfare, air defence, live-fire gunnery training, and visit, board, search and seizure (VBSS) operations, maintain the sources.

The Hindu : News / National : Japan to take part in India-U.S. naval exercises again
 
india need to collaborate with all like minded countries like japan, vietnam, australia and US. such a collaboration is likely to yield positive result for all participating countries.
 
diplomacy is an art of keeping all options open. there are no permanent friends and foes in diplomacy and politics. while we r trying hard to improve our relationship with china it wd be nice to keep other options open. after all china is also building closer ties with sri lanka, pak, bangladesh and myanmar. so wats wrong in that.
 
The threat to China is multiplying and India should try to improve its ties with China instead of a military alliance with Japan.

i dont think china is doing anything in those lines with respect to India - its a close ally of pakistan!!
 
Remaining non aligned may have denied us of the instant benefits some allies got.. But look at us now. We are the only nation that has access to all possible weaponry be it western or Russian.
And if anything, building ties with countries like Japan USA etc. will only bolster out talks with China. Gives us a much bigger diplomatic standing. China isn't gonna try and invade a country with the Russians AND Americans watching its back.
 
Remaining non aligned may have denied us of the instant benefits some allies got.. But look at us now. We are the only nation that has access to all possible weaponry be it western or Russian.
And if anything, building ties with countries like Japan USA etc. will only bolster out talks with China. Gives us a much bigger diplomatic standing. China isn't gonna try and invade a country with the Russians AND Americans watching its back.

We do not want to nor do we need to invade India. The definition of victory is causing the opposing government to lose the ability to fight war, or lose control over the governed population. We recognize the sovereignty of India and its armed forces within its borders excluding disputed areas. But no further. There are many tools that we have of influencing, significantly, Indian public policy and perhaps its ability to wage war or maintain control.
 
We do not want to nor do we need to invade India. The definition of victory is causing the opposing government to lose the ability to fight war, or lose control over the governed population. We recognize the sovereignty of India and its armed forces within its borders excluding disputed areas. But no further.. There are many tools that we have of influencing, significantly, Indian public policy and perhaps its ability to wage war or maintain control.

Is this how Chinese diplomacy works ?? Looking outwardly magnanimous but in reality nothing ?

If you accept the Sovereignity then they are not disputed and vice versa..
 
Is this how Chinese diplomacy works ?? Looking outwardly magnanimous but in reality nothing ?

If you accept the Sovereignity then they are not disputed and vice versa..
don't worry he's not a member of communist party of china...

Write his words on air.... :)
 
We do not want to nor do we need to invade India. The definition of victory is causing the opposing government to lose the ability to fight war, or lose control over the governed population. We recognize the sovereignty of India and its armed forces within its borders excluding disputed areas. But no further. There are many tools that we have of influencing, significantly, Indian public policy and perhaps its ability to wage war or maintain control.

dont cry if same thing is told to you by other countries
 
Is this how Chinese diplomacy works ?? Looking outwardly magnanimous but in reality nothing ?

If you accept the Sovereignity then they are not disputed and vice versa..

Our diplomacy is some of the most compromising in the world. Countries that have disputes with the US or Russia quickly find out what uncompromising means.
 
Our diplomacy is some of the most compromising in the world. Countries that have disputes with the US or Russia quickly find out what uncompromising means.

I dont care what stand your CPC takes with other countries, but demanding Arunachal is considered uncompromsing to India.
 
We do not want to nor do we need to invade India. The definition of victory is causing the opposing government to lose the ability to fight war, or lose control over the governed population. We recognize the sovereignty of India and its armed forces within its borders excluding disputed areas. But no further. There are many tools that we have of influencing, significantly, Indian public policy and perhaps its ability to wage war or maintain control.

well.. then u r definately pretty bad at it..aint it?

Most indians who didnt care about china are becoming anti-China..India Armed Forces are increasing their profile in the NE..Arunachal pradesh is integrating more into Indian Society..."Look East" has been given prime policy by Indian Foreign office...Indo-US nuclear deal which unfreezes our nuclear resources is laready signed..India,Japan,SK are collaborating more with each other..etc..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom