What's new

Japan Slams China for Unauthorized Research Around Okinotori Island

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
May 1, 2010
5,283
1
9,162
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia
Japan Slams China for Unauthorized Research Around Okinotori Island
Japan’s exclusive economic zone around the remote island is being challenged by China again.
By Thisanka Siripala
January 08, 2019

The Japanese Embassy in Beijing has filed official protest with China after they admitted to conducting marine surveys around the Japan-held Okinotori island without permission. In mid-December last year, the Japanese Coast Guard intercepted a Chinese research vessel in waters surrounding Okinotori Island. Japan claims the uninhabited Okinotori island in the Pacific Ocean as its southernmost territory, which is 1700 kilometers south of Tokyo, and holds that Okinotori generates a 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ)

Signatories to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) like China are required to obtain permission to conduct research within EEZs. While China acknowledges Japan’s ownership of the island, the latest political row rests on China’s long-standing position that Okinotori “doesn’t fit the basic requirements to be recognized as an island” – and thus to generate an EEZ. China views Okinotori as a reef or rock at most, emphasizing that during high tide Okinotori has only 10 square meters of land area, roughly the size of a bedroom. The Chinese vessel angered Japanese authorities by wording the research mission as one on the “high seas” and “in accordance to the law.” China has repeatedly referenced article 121 of UNCLOS, which holds that “3. Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone…” (China has its own difficulties with this article in the South China Sea, where an arbitral tribunal ruled that none of the features are entitled to island status and an EEZ).

For Japanese nationalists, Okinotori Island is a matter of national pride and boils down to an issue of sovereignty. The 400,000 square kilometer (200 nautical miles) EEZ generated by the territory is a boon for a resource scarce Japan. The Japanese government is also fed up with China’s public remarks that Japan’s EEZ claim is illegal as well as their dismissal of Okinotori’s maritime features. Japan is suspicious that China’s ocean survey is actually a cover for investigating the area’s natural resources.

In October last year, the relationship between China and Japan looked to be on the mend at a bilateral summit meeting where both leaders put aside hostilities and pledged a new historic commitment to building stronger economic links. The relationship was supposed to move “from competition to coexistence.” China’s decision to conduct an ocean survey around the sensitive Okinotori Island looks like a confusing blow to the delicate and freshly forged ties.

Mathieu Duchatel, a maritime security expert and Director of the Asia Program at the Institut Montaigne in Paris, says China’s abrupt confrontation over Okinotori Island can be linked to the recent cooperation and stabilization with Japan on the Senkaku islands territorial dispute, which he describes as being temporarily frozen.

The last time the tiny Okinotori Island encountered territorial interference was from Taiwan back in March 2016 and the topic has since retreated from public attention.

But Duchatel points out that the timing of China’s latest act of defiance can be explained by a tit-for-tat scenario. “China is sending a message that they are reacting to Japan’s policy in the South China Sea… Unless China exerts a frequent presence around Okinotori Island, which I don’t see why they would, the issue will lose steam,” he says.

During Japan’s anti-submarine warfare exercises near the South China Sea late last year, China turned a blind eye, refraining from public reaction.

Although Japan has lodged a formal complaint with China, the issue has remained relatively quiet on the international front. No legal procedures have been pursued by China or other parties like South Korea and Taiwan that also contest Japan’s claim to an EEZ in the rich fishing waters surrounding Okinotori Island.

Duchatel says the overall relationship between China and Japan is being treated separately. He says China is signaling that there are issues they plan to cooperate on despite the difficulty and issues they won’t. “Japan challenging China in the South China Sea and China challenging Japan on Okinotori Island is the way the countries remind each other that they disagree on some key issues,” he explains.
 
Japan Slams China for Unauthorized Research Around Okinotori Island
Japan’s exclusive economic zone around the remote island is being challenged by China again.
By Thisanka Siripala
January 08, 2019

The Japanese Embassy in Beijing has filed official protest with China after they admitted to conducting marine surveys around the Japan-held Okinotori island without permission. In mid-December last year, the Japanese Coast Guard intercepted a Chinese research vessel in waters surrounding Okinotori Island. Japan claims the uninhabited Okinotori island in the Pacific Ocean as its southernmost territory, which is 1700 kilometers south of Tokyo, and holds that Okinotori generates a 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ)

Signatories to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) like China are required to obtain permission to conduct research within EEZs. While China acknowledges Japan’s ownership of the island, the latest political row rests on China’s long-standing position that Okinotori “doesn’t fit the basic requirements to be recognized as an island” – and thus to generate an EEZ. China views Okinotori as a reef or rock at most, emphasizing that during high tide Okinotori has only 10 square meters of land area, roughly the size of a bedroom. The Chinese vessel angered Japanese authorities by wording the research mission as one on the “high seas” and “in accordance to the law.” China has repeatedly referenced article 121 of UNCLOS, which holds that “3. Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone…” (China has its own difficulties with this article in the South China Sea, where an arbitral tribunal ruled that none of the features are entitled to island status and an EEZ).

For Japanese nationalists, Okinotori Island is a matter of national pride and boils down to an issue of sovereignty. The 400,000 square kilometer (200 nautical miles) EEZ generated by the territory is a boon for a resource scarce Japan. The Japanese government is also fed up with China’s public remarks that Japan’s EEZ claim is illegal as well as their dismissal of Okinotori’s maritime features. Japan is suspicious that China’s ocean survey is actually a cover for investigating the area’s natural resources.

In October last year, the relationship between China and Japan looked to be on the mend at a bilateral summit meeting where both leaders put aside hostilities and pledged a new historic commitment to building stronger economic links. The relationship was supposed to move “from competition to coexistence.” China’s decision to conduct an ocean survey around the sensitive Okinotori Island looks like a confusing blow to the delicate and freshly forged ties.

Mathieu Duchatel, a maritime security expert and Director of the Asia Program at the Institut Montaigne in Paris, says China’s abrupt confrontation over Okinotori Island can be linked to the recent cooperation and stabilization with Japan on the Senkaku islands territorial dispute, which he describes as being temporarily frozen.

The last time the tiny Okinotori Island encountered territorial interference was from Taiwan back in March 2016 and the topic has since retreated from public attention.

But Duchatel points out that the timing of China’s latest act of defiance can be explained by a tit-for-tat scenario. “China is sending a message that they are reacting to Japan’s policy in the South China Sea… Unless China exerts a frequent presence around Okinotori Island, which I don’t see why they would, the issue will lose steam,” he says.

During Japan’s anti-submarine warfare exercises near the South China Sea late last year, China turned a blind eye, refraining from public reaction.

Although Japan has lodged a formal complaint with China, the issue has remained relatively quiet on the international front. No legal procedures have been pursued by China or other parties like South Korea and Taiwan that also contest Japan’s claim to an EEZ in the rich fishing waters surrounding Okinotori Island.

Duchatel says the overall relationship between China and Japan is being treated separately. He says China is signaling that there are issues they plan to cooperate on despite the difficulty and issues they won’t. “Japan challenging China in the South China Sea and China challenging Japan on Okinotori Island is the way the countries remind each other that they disagree on some key issues,” he explains.

Okinotori is a piece of rock not entitled to any EEZ.
okinotori6.jpg
 
we should build another island and claim it, f ck japanese, they own shit. they don't even have sovereignty over their own country.

Exactly. China built islands on rocks. So on that principle, Japan should face no opposition from China if Japan decides to make an island on it with an airbase. Also, China claims the enter sea around those reefs that they built islands on in the sea between the Philippines and Vietnam. So Japan should face no opposition from China on that the principle of claiming the sea area around the rock above the sea. However Japan is still a bit shy in its claim since Japan is only claiming an EEZ while China is claiming the sea between Vietnam and the Philippines to be China's sovereign territory. So on that principle, Japan should be able to claim the EEZ around Okinotorishima as sovereign territory and still should expect no opposition from China.

Or in other words, the degree of hypocrisy made by China (or at least the posts in this thread) shoots through the roof.
 
Exactly. China built islands on rocks. So on that principle, Japan should face no opposition from China if Japan decides to make an island on it with an airbase. Also, China claims the enter sea around those reefs that they built islands on in the sea between the Philippines and Vietnam. So Japan should face no opposition from China on that the principle of claiming the sea area around the rock above the sea. However Japan is still a bit shy in its claim since Japan is only claiming an EEZ while China is claiming the sea between Vietnam and the Philippines to be China's sovereign territory. So on that principle, Japan should be able to claim the EEZ around Okinotorishima as sovereign territory and still should expect no opposition from China.

Or in other words, the degree of hypocrisy made by China (or at least the posts in this thread) shoots through the roof.

No, That's just smart play using the laws to their benefits.

Japan could do the same and the chinese wont do shit about it.
 
Japan doesn't have an exclusive economic zone because Japan doesn't exist. Only sovereign states are recognized, not enslaved squatters.

If China continues to be bothered by Japan being a good host for forward deployed US forces, then Japan must be doing something right because we all know that China's ultimate goal is the witbdrawal of US forces from the western Pacific.

But as long as China maintains its 9 dash line, maintains that Taiwan is its "brother" that must be unified even if by force, and continues to intrude into Senkaku territorial waters, then US forced will continue to be welcomed in Japan.

No, That's just smart play using the laws to their benefits.

Japan could do the same and the chinese wont do shit about it.

Not about smart. Its about not sharing with ASEAN neighbors out of greed.
 
Exactly. China built islands on rocks. So on that principle, Japan should face no opposition from China if Japan decides to make an island on it with an airbase. Also, China claims the enter sea around those reefs that they built islands on in the sea between the Philippines and Vietnam. So Japan should face no opposition from China on that the principle of claiming the sea area around the rock above the sea. However Japan is still a bit shy in its claim since Japan is only claiming an EEZ while China is claiming the sea between Vietnam and the Philippines to be China's sovereign territory. So on that principle, Japan should be able to claim the EEZ around Okinotorishima as sovereign territory and still should expect no opposition from China.

You are correct in that China is not claiming EEZ from the islands and reefs in the SCS, which makes the case entirely different. So you are comparing apples to oranges by exerting EEZ claim on a reef that is incapable of generating EEZ to the Chinese claim of historic title.
 
Exactly. China built islands on rocks. So on that principle, Japan should face no opposition from China if Japan decides to make an island on it with an airbase. Also, China claims the enter sea around those reefs that they built islands on in the sea between the Philippines and Vietnam. So Japan should face no opposition from China on that the principle of claiming the sea area around the rock above the sea. However Japan is still a bit shy in its claim since Japan is only claiming an EEZ while China is claiming the sea between Vietnam and the Philippines to be China's sovereign territory. So on that principle, Japan should be able to claim the EEZ around Okinotorishima as sovereign territory and still should expect no opposition from China.

Or in other words, the degree of hypocrisy made by China (or at least the posts in this thread) shoots through the roof.
Not entirely true. What Japan claim is a submerged rock. On the other hand, Spratly group of features, there is an island among these features. There is only one feature within these features that can be classified as an island per UNCLOS. It has water and is self sustainable. With that island comes with it the 200km EEZ. So what China claim is per international law. What Japan claim is not.
 
You are correct in that China is not claiming EEZ from the islands and reefs in the SCS, which makes the case entirely different. So you are comparing apples to oranges by exerting EEZ claim on a reef that is incapable of generating EEZ to the Chinese claim of historic title.

Well yes I am correct on that but one other point that you seemed to have missed. I was not saying both are like apples. I did say that are oranges and apples. One is just a claim of an EEZ while the other (9 dash line) is claiming sovereign territory. There is a difference. EEZ is still international waters. Sovereignty claims a greater degree of special rights. Historical use does not form the basis of sovereign water territory. China should share with Vietnam and the Philippines.

Not entirely true. What Japan claim is a submerged rock. On the other hand, Spratly group of features, there is an island among these features. There is only one feature within these features that can be classified as an island per UNCLOS. It has water and is self sustainable. With that island comes with it the 200km EEZ. So what China claim is per international law. What Japan claim is not.

Which is a fair point. But for fair reciprocation, China should leave its bases in the Spratly island groups. Most particularly the big air base built on top of Mischeif Reef. This reef is almost a 1000 km away from China mainland and this reef is inside the EEZ zone of the Philippines. So who is causing the greater degree of violation here? If Japan obeys an international construct that is horrifically violated by other major powers, then it would just make Japan a sucker. So get out of Mischief Reef, along with Fiery Cross Reef and Subi Reef, then I think Japan would warm a little to taking away its EEZ claim at Okinotorishima.
 
If China continues to be bothered by Japan being a good host for forward deployed US forces, then Japan must be doing something right because we all know that China's ultimate goal is the witbdrawal of US forces from the western Pacific.

But as long as China maintains its 9 dash line, maintains that Taiwan is its "brother" that must be unified even if by force, and continues to intrude into Senkaku territorial waters, then US forced will continue to be welcomed in Japan.
Tell me, how did you come to be such a degenerate weeb? Did it start as an addiction to cartoon pornography and spiral from there? :)

You know, I'll do you a favour here - I'll make your fondest wish come true - and address you as though you were actually Japanese. You are completely correct that China will expel the US from its sphere of influence; that is China's Manifest Destiny. Where you are sorely mistaken is in beginning a sentence having to do with China with "but as long as..."

But nothing, slave. You do not set terms, you merely obey. You may rest easy in knowing that nothing will change for you; when China is ascendant you shall remain a slave, just answering to a different master. Don't worry, the old patterns will come back to you:
Song_960_7367w.jpg
 
Well yes I am correct on that but one other point that you seemed to have missed. I was not saying both are like apples. I did say that are oranges and apples. One is just a claim of an EEZ while the other (9 dash line) is claiming sovereign territory. There is a difference. EEZ is still international waters. Sovereignty claims a greater degree of special rights. Historical use does not form the basis of sovereign water territory. China should share with Vietnam and the Philippines.



Which is a fair point. But for fair reciprocation, China should leave its bases in the Spratly island groups. Most particularly the big air base built on top of Mischeif Reef. This reef is almost a 1000 km away from China mainland and this reef is inside the EEZ zone of the Philippines. So who is causing the greater degree of violation here? If Japan obeys an international construct that is horrifically violated by other major powers, then it would just make Japan a sucker. So get out of Mischief Reef, along with Fiery Cross Reef and Subi Reef, then I think Japan would warm a little to taking away its EEZ claim at Okinotorishima.

Historic title is exactly a claim of territorial sovereignty over the water, which is allowed for in the UNCLOS.
And no, it is always the ownership of the land territory that gives the right to the surrounding water, never the other way around where one can lay claims to land territory via EEZ. Matter fact, a nation can own land territory within another country's territorial water, and no amount of claim to any water can be translated into land possession.
 
Tell me, how did you come to be such a degenerate weeb? Did it start as an addiction to cartoon pornography and spiral from there? :)

You know, I'll do you a favour here - I'll make your fondest wish come true - and address you as though you were actually Japanese. You are completely correct that China will expel the US from its sphere of influence; that is China's Manifest Destiny. Where you are sorely mistaken is in beginning a sentence having to do with China with "but as long as..."

But nothing, slave. You do not set terms, you merely obey. You may rest easy in knowing that nothing will change for you; when China is ascendant you shall remain a slave, just answering to a different master. Don't worry, the old patterns will come back to you:
Song_960_7367w.jpg
Made in Occupied Japan
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom