What's new

Japan firms ready for agriculture technology transfer for VN

Other TPP members ( except VN) are US's vassal state, US has impose whatever they want on those nations for long time already.

VN welcome the TPP and hope it will bring more benefit to us :)

TPP has good benefits for Vietnam, but also has negative elements. Its the same story for the other countries, that's why no one has agreed to sign TPP, Its necessary to negotiate to try to eliminate those negative elements.

Yes but it makes it difficult for us to engage our own partners because we have to be mindful of what the Americans think. And they do try to influence our rapport with China and Russia.

Do you know that the US invited and recommended that Japan should do active patrols deep inside the SCS? Do you know what this would have done to the Japanese-Chinese relations? Lol.

Luckily our Ministry of Defende politely declined to respond to the US. We will not pursue a policy that will instigate or further destabilize not only Southeast Asian but most importantly our very own East Asian region.

I tell you another thing, the fact that US pushed Japan to impose sanctions on Russia is not a good thing for Japan. Russian Japanese relations were going well and they were going to try to negotiate a solution to those islands plus more trade, Russian gas to Japan, etc. Now all that is frozen and you have Russian bombers intruding into Japanese airspace all the time.
 
TPP has good benefits for Vietnam, but also has negative elements. Its the same story for the other countries, that's why no one has agreed to sign TPP, Its necessary to negotiate to try to eliminate those negative elements.
There are almot nothing good from TPP for other nations like JP-Aussie-TW etc bcs they have to stop trading with CN, and they also can not quit the deal, but they have no choice since they are US's vassal states and need US's protection while it's good for VN bcs we want to stop trading with CN as soon a possible to reduce the trade deficit.

We also can quit the TPP deal whenever we see no more benefit, so, it is the high and right time for VN to stay on US's side to weaken our bad neighbour CN.

For VN - JP relationship, as I said above: the VN Govt finnally admit that ODA brings more harm than benefit, so to improve the relationship with VN, JP must stop playing dirty ODA trick now.
 
I tell you another thing, the fact that US pushed Japan to impose sanctions on Russia is not a good thing for Japan. Russian Japanese relations were going well and they were going to try to negotiate a solution to those islands plus more trade, Russian gas to Japan, etc. Now all that is frozen and you have Russian bombers intruding into Japanese airspace all the time.

My friend, i know of this. Let' sjust say that it does not benefit the US for Japan to develop warming relations between Russia and China. Ay Dios Mio.

For VN - JP relationship, as I said above: the VN Govt finnally admit that ODA brings more harm than benefit, so to improve the relationship with VN, JP must stop playing dirty ODA trick now.

Of course and its very unfortunate that there were some abuses , corruption issues. But as in anything, there were transformational changes that has led to reduction in corruption cases. This benefits Vietnam as well as Japan because we would like to continue helping and cooperating with Vietnam, which we consider a major partner in Southeast Asia.

Some official reports for you to read:

http://www.jica.go.jp/vietnam/offic...am_Partnership_To_Date_and_From_Now_On_en.pdf

http://www.oecd.org/site/adboecdanti-corruptioninitiative/11thRegSeminarPressRelease.pdf

http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/PDF_GG5_Seminar/GG5_Adviser1.pdf
 
My friend, i know of this. Let' sjust say that it does not benefit the US for Japan to develop warming relations between Russia and China. Ay Dios Mio.

Well, I can't help myself, so I'll give you another hint that is a derivative of your own words:
"It does not benefit the US for Europe to develop warming relations between Russia and Europe" as it was already happening and Putin was talking about a grand "Eurasian economic union" (EU and Russia plus the central Asian states).

Cough cough, you get the idea? Cough cough
 
You are referring to --備長炭-- yes? If so, of course, every Japanese prefers to use this when cooking specific dishes such as unagi or yakitori. 備長炭 Is very delicate and the way it was created is due to the fineness , when it is used it does not release odors that ruins the flavor of the food being prepared, that is why it is expensive and it is a unique Japanese product. I didn't know Vietnamese were transferred this technology , but if so then that's great. You bet we will be buying this product from Vietnam; as it is essential in traditional cooking :).

As for Tuna, hehe. One of the biggest a imports Japan has from Vietnam is fish, specifically bluen fin tuna, and something Japanese can't have enough of , lol. Also abother big big favorite is sea bass, and swordfish. :)

Bring it on Vietnam!

I myself exported 備長炭
Price to Japan: about 1,500 - 1,600$ / MT
to Korea : 1,200$ / MT
 
Yes but it makes it difficult for us to engage our own partners because we have to be mindful of what the Americans think. And they do try to influence our rapport with China and Russia.

Do you know that the US invited and recommended that Japan should do active patrols deep inside the SCS? Do you know what this would have done to the Japanese-Chinese relations? Lol.

Luckily our Ministry of Defende politely declined to respond to the US. We will not pursue a policy that will instigate or further destabilize not only Southeast Asian but most importantly our very own East Asian region.

Very wise decision from the Japanese part, the Viets and Pinoys were jumping in joy when they saw that American suggestion. It's like telling Japan to step on a pile of poop while Sam is waiting eagerly for Japan to fall into that trap.

Here another one from DRAY
China is building a string of artificial islands to fortify its position in the disputed South China

These people are so delusional to think Japan is a total fool :rofl:
 
Very wise decision from the Japanese part, the Viets and Pinoys were jumping in joy when they saw that American suggestion. It's like telling Japan to step on a pile of poop while Sam is waiting eagerly for Japan to fall into that trap.

Here another one from DRAY
China is building a string of artificial islands to fortify its position in the disputed South China

These people are so delusional to think Japan is a total fool :rofl:

Japan has the capability to do patrols in the South China Sea, why we even have a permanent naval and air base in Djibouti, home to a destroyer squadron of the JMSDF, hosts an air squadron of maritime patrol aircraft , and close to a battalion of Japanese soldiers. Japan patrols not only the Straits of Djibouti, Gulf of Aden, but the Straits of Hormuz, the Cape of Good Hope, patrols the Arctic Circle, the Mediterranean Sea --- all other areas that require our presence to ensure stability, and ward off piracy.

However, why in goodness sakes would we send a squadron or so of our ships to the South China Sea? Japan has time and time again told all parties that we want to work with partners there to reduce tension; sending our ships there would be the antithesis of our statements. Japan has no territorial claims in the South China Sea and that area is already tense enough, a lot good sending JMSDF ships there would do. lol.

Besides, everything seems to be 'calming' down in the SCS. Compared to what it was like in 2013-2014. ;)
 
Japan has the capability to do patrols in the South China Sea, why we even have a permanent naval and air base in Djibouti, home to a destroyer squadron of the JMSDF, hosts an air squadron of maritime patrol aircraft , and close to a battalion of Japanese soldiers. Japan patrols not only the Straits of Djibouti, Gulf of Aden, but the Straits of Hormuz, the Cape of Good Hope, patrols the Arctic Circle, the Mediterranean Sea --- all other areas that require our presence to ensure stability, and ward off piracy.

However, why in goodness sakes would we send a squadron or so of our ships to the South China Sea? Japan has time and time again told all parties that we want to work with partners there to reduce tension; sending our ships there would be the antithesis of our statements. Japan has no territorial claims in the South China Sea and that area is already tense enough, a lot good sending JMSDF ships there would do. lol.

Besides, everything seems to be 'calming' down in the SCS. Compared to what it was like in 2013-2014. ;)

The only one who would benefit from this agenda is USA while China-Japanese trade will take another hit. It will only serve US as long her allies have to suffer. Look at German-Russian and Japanese-Russian trade because of the imposed sanctions. Not surprised EU/SK/Aus all joined AIIB for their own interests, everyone are tired of the American selfishness. But you know, the US can't keep playing this kind of game as China is changing the rules.
 
.
The only one who would benefit from this agenda is USA while China-Japanese trade will take another hit. It will only serve US as long her allies have to suffer. Look at German-Russian and Japanese-Russian trade because of the imposed sanctions. Not surprised EU/SK/Aus all joined AIIB for their own interests, everyone are tired of the American selfishness. But you know, the US can't keep playing this kind of game as China is changing the rules.
JP is a 'yes man ' of the US, they have no choice but to join the TPP to make US happy, so you can't hope that they will be on your side except you can kick US out of Okinawa and take control of it :)
 
Did Japan sign the TPP yet ?
JP soon have to sign, as a vassal state of USA , she has no choice. don't make daddy US angry or they will kill your PM like they killed South VN president Ngo Dinh Diem and find another 'yes man' that will sign any things for US :)
 
Update news: JP 'yes man' PM learned well from S.VN president and he will sign the TPP soon :).

.
Trans-Pacific Partnership: Japanese negotiator optimistic of deal with US crucial to trade pact
UPDATED ABOUT 5 HOURS AGO
Email Facebook Twitter

PHOTO
The Tran-Pacific Partnership would cut trade barriers and harmonise standards over two-fifths of the world's economy.

AFP
Japan's top trade negotiator is optimistic he can reach a deal with the United States that is essential to creating the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a free trade pact that aims to cover 12 countries including Australia.
Trans-Pacific Partnership: Japanese negotiator optimistic of deal with US crucial to trade pact - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
CN soon will cry a river when the TPP members stop trafing with them. More jobs will lose, more money will be lost, living cost go up, doom day is coming closer :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom