Jaish chief Masood Azhar is in Pak’, admits foreign minister, then says ‘he is very unwell’

[El Sidd]

Sir i did start one to help someone i knew... yes...thats the only thread i on the subject i started.

let me help you further. that ghost troubling that person was sent by Masood Azhar

Imagine that

and this

 

[BATMAN]

Inform Indian doctors, they should conduct surgery instead of Indian army.

 

[IFB]

let me help you further. that ghost troubling that person was sent by Masood Azhar

and this

Sir billions of People do believe in things they dont see... like god....so it should not be much surprise that there are people who believe in the paranormal...if one is crazy the other is too

 

[El Sidd]

Sir billions of People do believe in things they dont see... like god....so it should not be much surprise that there are people who believe in the paranormal.

and just like your belief that every Pakistani is a terrorist?

 

[R Wing]

It's really simple Endians, prove in U.N that he's a terrorist responsible for all your ills & slow motions & get the guy. Failing to do so will get you a baba ji ka thullu as usual.


He should be treated Ayurvedically.

Oh, that was bloody brilliant.

 

[IFB]

and just like your belief that every Pakistani is a terrorist?

I dont remember every saying such a thing since i joined this forum.

 

[R Wing]

Nah its very predictable,terrorists are their heroes.

Let's imagine there is a Hindu majority disputed territory that Pakistan illegally occupies with brute force, creating a draconian concentration-camp like situation where the security forces can rape, kidnap, plunder, etc., and Muslim mullahs can gang-rape under-aged Hindu girls in temples and not be punished.

Wouldn't any morally upright Hindu believe it is ethically sound, rather imperative, to support the Hindu civilians getting crushed under an illegal and violent occupation? Would the support to the freedom fighters in this occupied land, who take great care only to attack occupational forces and avoid civilian casualties in the area, be called "state sponsorship of terrorism" in India --- or doing the right thing?

Or, how about another example. A member of the Indian version of the Ku Klux Klan (RSS), previously blacklisted for his role in a communal massacre, becomes the democratically-elected leader of India. A terrorist is your leader, and you're having trouble understanding our support for freedom fighters in an illegally occupied land?

Finally, I bring your attention to RAW's illustrious history (and present) of supporting terrorist movements, such as the Tamil Tigers and the Baloch terrorists. Oh, wait, "that's different" --- right?

Grow up.

 

[lightoftruth]

Let's imagine there is a Hindu majority disputed territory that Pakistan illegally occupies with brute force, creating a draconian concentration-camp like situation where the security forces can rape, kidnap, plunder, etc., and Muslim mullahs can gang-rape under-aged Hindu girls in temples and not be punished.

Wouldn't any morally upright Hindu believe it is ethically sound, rather imperative, to support the Hindu civilians getting crushed under an illegal and violent occupation? Would the support to the freedom fighters in this occupied land, who take great care only to attack occupational forces and avoid civilian casualties in the area, be called "state sponsorship of terrorism" in India --- or doing the right thing?

Or, how about another example. A member of the Indian version of the Ku Klux Klan (RSS), previously blacklisted for his role in a communal massacre, becomes the democratically-elected leader of India. A terrorist is your leader, and you're having trouble understanding our support for freedom fighters in an illegally occupied land?

Finally, I bring your attention to RAW's illustrious history (and present) of supporting terrorist movements, such as the Tamil Tigers and the Baloch terrorists. Oh, wait, "that's different" --- right?

Grow up.

You don't have to justify it to me.
Justify it to the rest of the world ,is hafiz saeed a terrorist in front of the world or not ?
or is it a global conspiracy ?

 

[xyxmt]

when did Pakistan deny his presence in Pakistan.

 

[R Wing]

You don't have to justify it to me.
Justify it to the rest of the world ,is hafiz saeed a terrorist in front of the world or not ?
or is it a global conspiracy ?

In front of NATO countries that see propping up India (and turning a blind eye to its terror sponsorship in the region) against growing Chinese influence as their only hope, sure --- they might think that. We don't need to justify it to them either. They need us to save face and find peace in Afghanistan. They trade with us. They invest in us. It's all good.

NATO countries also thought Iraq had WMDs. As did the New York Times.

If you can get out of your post-colonial mind-prison, maybe you could be in touch with reality and not just what your white masters think / want to think.

Just because the West turns a blind eye to India's state sponsorship of terrorism, don't pretend that it doesn't exist. If we host Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar, you host Baloch terrorist leaders. Don't be so hypocritical.

 

[Chanakyaa]

So what? Whole world know he is Pakistani and is in Pakistan. UN sanctions on him are of financial and political nature not a bounty.

wow. Are you really proud of This pakistani ?

https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/...ctions_list/summaries/entity/jaish-i-mohammed

JiM is based in Peshawar and Muzaffarabad, Pakistan, but members conduct terrorist activities primarily in Kashmir. They also co-operate with the Taliban in attacks against Afghan government and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) targets in Afghanistan. JiM maintained training camps in Afghanistan until the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001.

JiM has had close ties with both Al-Qaida (QDe.004), and the Taliban. Usama bin Laden is believed to have provided funds to JiM. In anticipation of asset seizures by the Pakistani Government, JiM has withdrawn funds from bank accounts and invested in businesses such as commodity trading, real estate and the production of consumer goods. JiM members have also set up two organizations registered in Pakistan as humanitarian aid agencies: Al-Akhtar Trust International (QDe.121) and Alkhair Trust. JiM hoped to give the impression that the two new organizations were separate entities and sought to use them as a way to deliver arms and ammunition to its members under the guise of providing humanitarian aid to refugees and other needy groups.

 

[El Sidd]

I dont remember every saying such a thing since i joined this forum.

government of india is however quite intent in proving the world that all Pakistanis are terrorists

 

[lightoftruth]

In front of NATO countries that see propping up India (and turning a blind eye to its terror sponsorship in the region) against growing Chinese influence as their only hope, sure --- they might think that. We don't need to justify it to them either. They need us to save face and find peace in Afghanistan. They trade with us. They invest in us. It's all good.

NATO countries also thought Iraq had WMDs. As did the New York Times.

If you can get out of your post-colonial mind-prison, maybe you could be in touch with reality and not just what your white masters think / want to think.

Just because the West turns a blind eye to India's state sponsorship of terrorism, don't pretend that it doesn't exist. If we host Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar, you host Baloch terrorist leaders. Don't be so hypocritical.

Still didn't answer ,
why no one supports you ?
why rest of the world find terrorists in your country osama,hafiz,masood etc ?
global conspiracy ?
how can you justify terrorists in your country and your official support to them ?

 

[R Wing]

wow. Are you really proud of This pakistani ?

https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/...ctions_list/summaries/entity/jaish-i-mohammed

JiM is based in Peshawar and Muzaffarabad, Pakistan, but members conduct terrorist activities primarily in Kashmir. They also co-operate with the Taliban in attacks against Afghan government and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) targets in Afghanistan. JiM maintained training camps in Afghanistan until the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001.

JiM has had close ties with both Al-Qaida (QDe.004), and the Taliban. Usama bin Laden is believed to have provided funds to JiM. In anticipation of asset seizures by the Pakistani Government, JiM has withdrawn funds from bank accounts and invested in businesses such as commodity trading, real estate and the production of consumer goods. JiM members have also set up two organizations registered in Pakistan as humanitarian aid agencies: Al-Akhtar Trust International (QDe.121) and Alkhair Trust. JiM hoped to give the impression that the two new organizations were separate entities and sought to use them as a way to deliver arms and ammunition to its members under the guise of providing humanitarian aid to refugees and other needy groups.

You've heard the Western narrative so much that you've become blind.

Please understand. The West needs to prop up India as a buffer against growing Chinese influence in the region. It also wants to sell India expensive weaponry. THESE ARE THE ONLY REASONS THAT THEY TURN A BLIND EYE TO INDIA'S STATE SPONSORSHIP OF BALOCH (& other) TERRORISM.

Do you think you have any right to lecture us when Baloch terror leaders are enjoying treatment in Delhi hospitals and Indian hospitality in Dubai? We prepared exhaustive dossiers for the UN with tons of proof. What happened? Nothing.

The US dropped nuclear bombs on civilian populations in WWII. They invaded Iraq even when the UN/IAEA said there are no WMDs. After hundreds of thousands of deaths, they said "Oh, there are no WMDs." Isn't that terrorism? What is that?

Isn't what India does to occupied Kashmiris terrorism?

Please, don't be so hypocritical.

Still didn't answer ,
why no one supports you ?
why rest of the world find terrorists in your country osama,hafiz,masood etc ?
global conspiracy ?
how can you justify terrorists in your country and your official support to them ?

Again, only NATO countries who need India geostrategically against China ----

China supports us, the Gulf states support us, the US has sold us some of our best weaponry.

I can justify our support to FREEDOM FIGHTERS because India supports Baloch TERRORISTS (Balochistan, unlike IOK, is not under an illegal occupation and is not a disputed territory under international law.)

There, I answered all your questions.

Now, maybe you'd like to tell me about how India can justify supporting terrorists such as Tamil Tigers and Baloch Liberation Army, etc., that have killed hundreds or perhaps thousands of innocents?

 

[darksider]

What is there to admit.he is Pakistani national and its not secret he is in Pakistan.