below_freezing
ELITE MEMBER
yeh absolutely right captain....
its way too power in maneuverability, stealth and most importantly IMAGINATIONnnnnnnnnn....
but most of all its powerful in a certain statistic that begins with I and ends with Q.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
yeh absolutely right captain....
its way too power in maneuverability, stealth and most importantly IMAGINATIONnnnnnnnnn....
You can certainly think whatever you like. Simply know there are people that work closely with CAC in China that share the same view.Nope...No assumptions there.
Always funny to hear Indian trolls demonstrate their intelligence.yeh absolutely right captain....
its way too power in maneuverability, stealth and most importantly IMAGINATIONnnnnnnnnn....
I've talked with huzigeng on that point (he's the guy that first leaked the J-20 two years before it was seen). He stated some guy working at the 606 institute specifically leads a team to reduce engine noise and nozzle signal emission. He further stated that 2D TVC similar to F-22 will be out of the question, as the Chinese air force wants to pursue as agile of a plane as possible.remember that RCS advances have decreasing gains and asymptotically approach a fixed value of minimal detection distance, while maneuver is essentially unlimited except by physiology (and especially instantaneous turns). however i'm still suspicious of 3d thrust vector, it seems far too heavy.
but most of all its powerful in a certain statistic that begins with I and ends with Q.
that its so true brother... the J-20 will be king of the sky in the near future...That is another dangerous and quite ignorant assumption. With WS-15 3D TVC nozzle, all moving tail and canard, the J-20 can exceed F-22's manoevurability. It is designed from the start to be more agile than the Raptor, with better supercruise ability.


Are YOU a member of that group? If not, then what you claimed back on post 41 is as equally presumptuous as by those who you accused of being presumptuous. Of course, you can certainly think whatever you like.You can certainly think whatever you like. Simply know there are people that work closely with CAC in China that share the same view.
The control, stick grip movement is mechanically transferred to the left and right stabilizer servo cylinders through the pitch and roll command summing network, the feel assemblies, and the summing network.
It would the world's first aircraft designed specifically for bird strikes.Supercruise or no, it seems logical to me that the J-20 was designed from day one to be a raptor killer.
It would the world's first aircraft designed specifically for bird strikes.
Certainly I am not a member of that group, but that does not mean members of that group do not regularly visit forums in China and keep the public up to date with status of the project. It's not an assumption on my part, but rather a reflection of their views. Surpassing F-22's manoevurability was one of the "hard" requirements the military had imposed early in the process, even at the cost increased signature.Are YOU a member of that group? If not, then what you claimed back on post 41 is as equally presumptuous as by those who you accused of being presumptuous. Of course, you can certainly think whatever you like.
That again, is an assumption on your part that they would be unable to program the flight control to exceed its competitor. The project director himself specializes in this field and in addition an entire research faculty at Northwestern Industrial University is devoted to the job. You may wish to dismiss it as mere nationalistic view, but CAC engineers seems to be optimistic after windtunnel tests and simulations.The J-20's designers could be deliberately conservative for now. Or they may discover later that certain combinations of rules can send the aircraft into uncontrolled flight and exclude those combinations, making the aircraft less capable than its competitor. We do not know. So it is wise to put aside nationalist fervor and try to learn something.
No, it will not. Keep in mind that planes such as the J-20 and T-50 are what you build when you don't have the amount of research in low observable technologies and sensor fusion as your competitors. Fast and agile platforms that give better survival rate when your own pilots have reduced reaction time.that its so true brother... the J-20 will be king of the sky in the near future...![]()
Chinese air force wanted a plane that will have a chance against other 5th generation fighters when supported, not some magical "Raptor Killer" as you've put it.Supercruise or no, it seems logical to me that the J-20 was designed from day one to be a raptor killer.
No, it will not. Keep in mind that planes such as the J-20 and T-50 are what you build when you don't have the amount of research in low observable technologies and sensor fusion as your competitors. Fast and agile platforms that give better survival rate when your own pilots have reduced reaction time.
Americans will continue to control the sky for years to come.
No, it will not. Keep in mind that planes such as the J-20 and T-50 are what you build when you don't have the amount of research in low observable technologies and sensor fusion as your competitors. Fast and agile platforms that give better survival rate when your own pilots have reduced reaction time.
Americans will continue to control the sky for years to come.
Chinese air force wanted a plane that will have a chance against other 5th generation fighters when supported, not some magical "Raptor Killer" as you've put it.