‘It’s up to Pakistan where to use F-16 aircraft because we’ve paid for them,’ says Pakistan

[Jackdaws]

Here is full article

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage...because-weve-paid-them-says-pakistan-minister


Another u-turn?

 

[El Sidd]

Taiwan too

 

[macnurv]

Here is full article

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage...because-weve-paid-them-says-pakistan-minister


Another u-turn?

Again what does that prove? He is absolutely right, its our plane we use it where we wish it. Besides that this still doesnt prove that a mig-21 took down a F-16.

 

[Areesh]

Another u-turn?

I see nothing wrong in that statement. Obviously pakistan would use its f16 where ever it wants to

 

[untitled]

Excatly it is entirely up to us, how we use our Ef-Solas
Just like it is entirely up to you as to how to you use your Bisons. Whether you want to retire them or send them again to the front-line to have them blown out of the sky

Obviously pakistan would use its f16 where ever it wants to

But India wants us to use them as supersonic crop dusters

 

[IceCold]

Here is full article

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage...because-weve-paid-them-says-pakistan-minister


Another u-turn?

If you say so but in reality it means......keep whining Bitches

 

[Areesh]

But India wants us to use them as supersonic crop dusters

I think Indians belive that using f16 against IAF is violation of Geneva convention

 

[Maxpane]

sathya gaye hain

 

[untitled]

I think Indians belive that using f16 against IAF is violation of Geneva convention

Fighting against India should be against the Geneva convention

 

[R Wing]

WHEN INDIANS HAVE SOME KIND OF PROOF OF SHOOTING DOWN OUR F-16... WE CAN TALK.

 

[Pak_Sher]

Again what does that prove? He is absolutely right, its our plane we use it where we wish it. Besides that this still doesnt prove that a mig-21 took down a F-16.

Some agreements do require declaration of deployment plans, not sure if it was part of any agreement

 

[Areesh]

Fighting against India should be against the Geneva convention

Firing even a bullet on Indian soldiers is violation of Geneva convention

 

[macnurv]

Some agreements do require declaration of deployment plans, not sure if it was part of any agreement

For almost 99% of our weapon systems, it should be absolutely clear that they will be deployed and if need be used against India. Still Indian attempts have failed time and time again since last few days to provide and concrete evidence of their claims of shooting down an F-16, use of F-16 does not prove that it went down as claimed by them.

 

[Imran Khan]

 

[valkyr_96]

Firing even a bullet on Indian soldiers is violation of Geneva convention

But they should be given free pass in ICJ, they can use human shields, they can maim and disfigure people and use banana courts to hang muslims, they can export beef and eat it but a muslim cannot touch a cow.

So he was in the CMH I am sure he has made friends and will connect with them after retirement.