If that’s the case is Israel responsible for the Palestinians as a whole and using your logic makes them de facto Israeli citizens until they get their own state?![]()
Responsibility for entry and exit privileges is very different than citizenship, Sir.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If that’s the case is Israel responsible for the Palestinians as a whole and using your logic makes them de facto Israeli citizens until they get their own state?![]()
India is one of the stongest non muslim supporter of Palestine. We do not have any reason to hate Palestine but it does not mean that we shouldn't supprt Israel. Israel gave unconditional support during Kargil war.You are an Indian and you would suck up to anyone abusing Palestinians, Arabs or Muslims in general. That's the sole reason why Indians love Israel.
Why stop there when using your logic and Israel controls more than just the entry and exit privileges, as you put itResponsibility for entry and exit privileges is very different than citizenship, Sir.

Why stop there when using your logic and Israel controls more than just the entry and exit privileges, as you put it
Your whole stance on this is odd. You are well known to criticize Muslims/Islamic countries. In lots of cases totally justifiable, but then you’re here defending Israel which in some cases is just as bad.![]()
Not just this instance/thread, but I have seen you defend Israel on numerous occasions.Correction: I am not here to defend Israel. I am merely pointing out that in this case, it is legally on solid ground to deny entry to a humanitarian who is now no longer a humanitarian.
Not just this instance/thread, but I have seen you defend Israel on numerous occasions.
Well, you don’t fairly evaluate. Your logic seems to be that Muslim countries are worse and that justifies the way the Palestinians are treated, that just makes you a hypocrite and devalues your points on other issues. Why don’t you just be fair and criticize what’s wrong, rather than picking and choosing what fits your agenda.It depends on what the circumstances are, which I evaluate fairly and without prejudice. We can talk about it in other threads. Here, the topic is the denial of entry to a doctor by Israel.
Well, you don’t fairly evaluate. Your logic seems to be that Muslim countries are worse and that justifies the way the Palestinians are treated, that just makes you a hypocrite and devalues your points on other issues. Why don’t you just be fair and criticize what’s wrong, rather than picking and choosing what fits your agenda.
Well we have said forever let the Kashmiris choose....
2ndly this isnt the thread for it..
Secondly, It was you who were being "Language" Nazi over the choice of word. I have just given an analogy for "Administration" and control part.
Palestine is recognized by some countries as a Sovereign State and it is while Kashmir is not...
Correction: I am not here to defend Israel. I am merely pointing out that in this case, it is legally on solid ground to deny entry to a humanitarian who is now no longer a humanitarian.
What do you have to say about this.....
U.N. human rights investigators denied entry to Israel for Gaza inquiry - LA Times
Ha ha.. Well, Grammar Nazi and Language Nazi words are used as phrase in Internet for those who pin point or argue over grammar or choice of words respectively. I think you took it too personally.Nothing "Nazi" into that.My my ....What a response....I wasnt being nazi over the choice of words but pointing out the obvious...

I know what they mean...Just as usual being the nazi to point it outHa ha.. Well, Grammar Nazi and Language Nazi words are used as phrase in Internet for those who pin point or argue over grammar or choice of words respectively. I think you took it too personally.Nothing "Nazi" into that.![]()
