dont want to sound rude, but putting someone into the UNSC just because they have the biggest "democracy" in the world is just stupid.
im going to be constructive here. if you want to discuss do it with manner and constructive.
1. India has a high amount of corruption. extremely high, and recently they failed to pass a corruption law i heard. how can someone who cant fight corruption in their own country get the right do decide what is going to happen somewhere else in the world?
2. India is extremely poor. more poor in India than the other UNSC members combined. more poor than Africa. how can someone who cant take care of it's own citizens be able to decide what is going to happen in the world?
3. their democracy has big flaws, just like Turkey has. im critisizing India because it has corruption. i look at the Indian democracy more like some African countries... democracy only in the paper, nothing more. elections can be corrupted. and that is a policy changer. wich means that corrupt people keep doing this in their favour and the world has to suffer because of it.
that is my stance, i speak my mind and i hope someone can give constructive reply back if they want to.
remember, i am NOT hating and bashing on India, just pointing out my view!