What's new

Is Pakistan moving towards another.......?

We all know what a despot Bhutto was and his part in bangladesh and bugti I dont have two minutes for him
I think yahya khan was chief Marshal Law Ldministrator in 1971 and Bhutto was Minister in the government of General Ayub Khan before that, if he is doing some thing wrong why don't Army stop him at that time and why handover Power to him after The Fall Of Dhaka
 
The constant threat of intervention posed by the Pakistan army continues to provide incompetent and corrupt politicians and bureaucrats the opportunity to point at the army as the source of instability - however, if the army should intervene, it will only be on behalf of a a foreign power what will agree to subsidize the adventures of the army -- this "benefactor", needless to say, will get neither the action they seek nor will they be able to lessen the influence of a great neighbor, but they will get fleeced.
 
This one time for its own interests the US has infiltrated ( & taken control) so completely that the option of coup as we know is more than remote.

There is a need for a civilian head of state ( GOP , Islamabad) and the operational head of state ( GOP read GHQ , Rawalpindi). Both need to remain wary of each other and stay on ' simmer' if not ' boil' mode.

This arrangement suits the West & Pak well as of now.
 
This one time for its own interests the US has infiltrated ( & taken control) so completely that the option of coup as we know is more than remote.

There is a need for a civilian head of state ( GOP , Islamabad) and the operational head of state ( GOP read GHQ , Rawalpindi). Both need to remain wary of each other and stay on ' simmer' if not ' boil' mode.

This arrangement suits the West & Pak well as of now.
you are talking about India right:tdown:
 
Look mate if you look at the history in other countries that have democracy they have been through a phase of bloodshed and dictators, even england had cromwell. people with no land couldnt vote women couldnt vote until about 90 years ago they had rotton boroughs in england. Blacks couldnt vote in america til relativly recently. France had a very bloody revolution. Iran had a bloody revolution. Post independence some countries were lucky that they had leaders that got them independence and they wielded absolute power and saw their countries through these phases like you had nehru and then the name ghandi still carries weight in india even today. In Pakistan we were unlucky that the Quaid passed away very early.

I will summerize things what you have said-

1. a lot of countries had revolutions/social/political changes.
2.Jinnah passed away too early,like Gandhi.

But how is this related to a military coup anyhow? If you are advocating a military coup,then let me remind you that you had four of them in your country already,and all changed the situation from bad to worse.
 
Kiyani is a cunning person...He demanded and got the extension of 3 years for SOMETHING.....

yes yes he did and next you will claim he supports LeT and then you will claim he is preparing to attack india!? where did you get this conspiracy theory about "him being cunning & wanting extension for a reason"?

let me tell you pakistani politics ARMY WON'T come to power in the near future!! they will come when public dances with joy at their arrival! now is not that situation!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom