What's new

Is Pakistan moving towards another.......?

IF the army wants to take over then they must punish these traitors like zardari and nawaz sharif,

otherwise army does not need to come because army is never good for any country.
 
IF the army wants to take over then they must punish these traitors like zardari and nawaz sharif,

otherwise army does not need to come because army is never good for any country.

Thats a fair point whats the point of them taking over if they are not ruthless in improving our state. Actually that was my biggest beef with Mushi along when he did a deal with benazir and co. If army took over and locked up these trecherous politicos they would be very popular
 
Thats a fair point whats the point of them taking over if they are not ruthless in improving our state. Actually that was my biggest beef with Mushi along when he did a deal with benazir and co. If army took over and locked up these trecherous politicos they would be very popular

they better hang them, or more zardaris and nawaz sharifs are going to be born to ruin Pakistanis life.
 
IF the army wants to take over then they must punish these traitors like zardari and nawaz sharif,

otherwise army does not need to come because army is never good for any country.

army takeover is no good an option..bad for diplomacy..more chances of corruption..just take a look at the four previous military coup in the history of your country.None of them did any good to your country.
 
army takeover is no good an option..bad for diplomacy..more chances of corruption..just take a look at the four previous military coup in the history of your country.None of them did any good to your country.

yes that is why i said this in post #6 "army does not need to come because army is never good for any country."
 
you want to bypass courts. you hang ZULFQAR ALI BHUTTO and SARDAR BUGTI and results.:tdown:

Zulifkar Ali bhutto was good leader, and he was not hanged because of his corruption, he was hanged by a dictator who cared about his own interests,


and honestly, i really dont know much about sardar buti so it would be wrong for me to comment on him,

i said people like zardari and nawaz sharif who ruined Pakistanis lives.
 
army takeover is no good an option..bad for diplomacy..more chances of corruption..just take a look at the four previous military coup in the history of your country.None of them did any good to your country.

Look mate if you look at the history in other countries that have democracy they have been through a phase of bloodshed and dictators, even england had cromwell. people with no land couldnt vote women couldnt vote until about 90 years ago they had rotton boroughs in england. Blacks couldnt vote in america til relativly recently. France had a very bloody revolution. Iran had a bloody revolution. Post independence some countries were lucky that they had leaders that got them independence and they wielded absolute power and saw their countries through these phases like you had nehru and then the name ghandi still carries weight in india even today. In Pakistan we were unlucky that the Quaid passed away very early.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom