- Aug 19, 2021
- Reaction score
Second wave feminism, which was the most destructive wave of feminism, was mostly created and led by women belonging to a certain ethno-religious group:Oh believe me, the changes brought about by what is known as feminism were never reflective of a spontaneous, widely shared desire on the part of the broad female public.
Practically every leading feminist originated from a wealthy bourgeois household; one will have a hard time finding many working class females amongst early feminist figureheads. Indeed the working class is inherently conservative in cultural matters. As for females, by essence they blossom as family women and caring mothers rather than as interchangeable, disposable economic agents forced to rent out their physical and cognitive abilities for survival.
Also feminism is a modern day subversion introduced by capitalist oligarchs and freemasonry, with heavy support from globalist and zionist elites. Not some continuous ancient struggle stretching back thousands of years. It was initiated because it served the respective agendas of each one of the mentioned groups. Namely, the capitalist order at a specific historic juncture required females to be put to work in order to continue functioning. Having exploited the readily available male workforce to the hilt, further accumulation of capital, in the absence of which the system would collapse, called for mobilizing females next.
Likewise, the profound destabilization of the family structure which would inevitably ensue, was in line with the objectives of masonry and the anthropological transformations it is pursuing. These same forces in the western world would later give rise to phenomena such as mass abortion, rampant births out of wedlock etc. And they intend to impose this model on the entire planet. But as long as people conscious of the stakes exist, their propaganda, their social engineering will be denounced and resisted.
In traditional societies females usually did not go to work outside or far beyond the vicinity of their dwellings. This is the historic reality.
Generalized integration of females into the workforce will necessarily have an unfavorable impact on the preservation of the traditional family structure, and there's nothing much a government no matter its competence could possibly do about it. It's simply in the nature of things.