What's new

Iran says 25-year China agreement enters implementation stage

It's a direct quote from NY Times, perhaps you may click the link, leave a comment, kick some a$$ and teach Americans your terminology lesson? Anyway be specific, which term in that American article is offensive to Iranians?
As a matter of fact, I actually did see that article before posting a comment and I couldn't find it. I searched for Arabian and Firefox returned nothing. Nevertheless, my point stands valid. You may find Iranians less friendlier and hospitable than we're known for over such matters.
 
Saudis and Emirates will sweeten up their engagement with China through military and economic deals. Habibis will do whatever it takes to keep their borders and monarchy secure. That’s where I think Pakistan missed a lucrative opportunity when Saudis ask for it’s help.
 
As a matter of fact, I actually did see that article before posting a comment and I couldn't find it. I searched for Arabian and Firefox returned nothing. Nevertheless, my point stands valid. You may find Iranians less friendlier and hospitable than we're known for over such matters.
NYT is subscription only try this free Indian site Defenseworld posting the same article. Your point does stand valid, your country your rule, we do respect host countries' tradition & cultural sensitivity unlike Americans who just walk over anything they don't like. You will only find our reciprocity in friendliness.
 
Last edited:
NYT is subscription only try this free Indian site Defenseworld posting the same article. Your point does stand valid, your country your rule, we do respect host countries' tradition & cultural sensitivity unlike Americans who just walk over anything they don't like. You will only find our reciprocity in friendliness.
I don't like to make a big deal out of it when you have understood my point, and it doesn't make sense to turn this into a lengthy discussion when I have already expressed myself to the best of my ability, but just for the record, I didn't try to judge you or assume anything before checking the article. In fact, I opened the very same link you sent:

This doesn't seem like a subscription only article to me. Probably because I haven't reached my daily limit.
 
I don't like to make a big deal out of it when you have understood my point, and it doesn't make sense to turn this into a lengthy discussion when I have already expressed myself to the best of my ability, but just for the record, I didn't try to judge you or assume anything before checking the article. In fact, I opened the very same link you sent:

This doesn't seem like a subscription only article to me. Probably because I haven't reached my daily limit.
Agree, we can move on
 
Given that there is a military dimension to this contract - will we see Iran re-orient planned procurements from Russia to China ( in lei of whatever else Iran thinks it can make at home .. )
 
This is not military oriented in fact it has no military involved in it.. If this had military chinese relations with all others in the region would have faltererd and become hostile... Their interpretation of that will be ''Chinese is after us'' and as if it was a hostile move done by Beijing on them
Personally I think China should prefer Saudi Arabia to Iran for oil imports.

This is just business, so nothing special here.
 
It's a direct quote from NY Times, perhaps you may click the link now, leave a comment, kick some American a$$ and teach them your terminology lesson? Anyway be specific, which term in that American article is offensive to Iranians according to you?
Didn't check the article posted because it is hidden behind some nonsense wall but it high likely used the incorrect version name of the Persian gulf. I am sure you have no ill intentions, in fact i do not see any Chinese with enmity towards Iran (maybe the Taiwanese traitors only and other puppets) and most of them are supportive of Iran and our culture.
@QWECXZ
 
$70 Billion investment in Pakistan seems very tiny amount, if we look $400 Billions investment in Iran,

I think China should invest more in roads and especially in railways projects in Pakistan
Why should china invest in a country..where a non corrupt leader received after decades is being hushed away by people in favor of former corrupt families that also happen to be pro US.
US $400 billion is China's total investment in Iran in the next 25 years.

The $70 billion only involves the investment in railway and power generation projects in Karachi in CEPC infrastructure. It is only the third investment of CEPC.
China is importing lot of oil which is part of that $400 billion deal. This ignorant Chap doesnt understand you need something which only the other party has.
 
I think China should invest more in roads and especially in railways projects in Pakistan
China already did, its called "CPEC". You got JF17s and CPEC, and you're still greedy for more? cmon bro China tried for you guys, even new subs??? damn.
should be more to benefit Iran
BUt it already is! Why would Iran sign it if it wasnt? Another one of your redundant rhetoric points? smh
will we see Iran re-orient planned procurements from Russia to China ( in lei of whatever else Iran thinks it can make at home .. )
Not true- Iran wont ceede such independence to China- Iran doesnt deal with Russia from an inferior-position mindset. Iran knows regret comes with ceding valuables to the likes of Russia and China, so no, Iran wont limit itself like that, afterall, Russia and CHina have been very weird and peculiar about what weapons they sell Iran.
the easiest way to piss off Iran is to call the Persian Gulf Arabian Gulf
:-)
But its only Americans who've lost influence in the world who call it that though?🤔
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Back
Top Bottom