OguzSenturk
BANNED
Wait.... What??? Are you confusing me with someone else? If you don't think so, please prove that i wrote something hateful about Iran. Because i think the opposite.You wrote something hateful about Iran
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wait.... What??? Are you confusing me with someone else? If you don't think so, please prove that i wrote something hateful about Iran. Because i think the opposite.You wrote something hateful about Iran
Bringing India to ur country you already playing with fire India is a major issue for everyone and peace u will never get peace if u bring evil upon ur brother country u will get in firing range tooGood for them , it will help protect our port Chabahar makes the region safer.
Iran building a aircraft carrier in few years time is as good as believing the earth is cube.
Indeed. Besides, why a carrier after all the rethoric claiming the era of the carrier is over....?An aircraft carrier doesn't fit into Iran's naval asymmetrical strategy. I call nonsense.
Sitting still and quiet on the ocean floor never sunk no ships. If this is the task, then you can build a concrete 'submarine' and sink it at key points. No need for a complex bit of kit like a real submarine.The best naval assets for asymmetric warfare are submarines, specifically AIP conventional submarines that can lie dormant and noiseless on the sea floor.
Carriers are more for a show of force against weaker opponents.
I would laugh just as hard if e.g. Pakistan would be planning a carrier (considering the state of its navy, priorities and capabilities are and should be different)Why is it that other countries can have an AC but if Iran plans to build one and suddenly people are going crazy. If Iran has the capability and the desire to build an AC i say good on them. People made fun of Pakistan when it wanted to build an A-bomb, the rest is now history.
Does Iran need an AC? now thats a separate question. In my opinion ACs have lost their effectiveness that they once used to have. Now they are just a glorified sitting duck just like the massive battleships. a small missile boat can easily sink them or by a diesel submarine lurking in the depth, not to mention how expensive these ACs are to manage and operate.
Indeed. Besides, why a carrier after all the rethoric claiming the era of the carrier is over....?
Sitting still and quiet on the ocean floor never sunk no ships.
Thusfar, Iran has managed to build only surface combattants of less than 2000 tons full load, on the basis of reverse enginered and modified British design. A serious flat top (i.e. including hangar) would need to be at least 12000-14000 tons (see e.g. Thai navy HTMS Chakri Naruebet or Italian navy MMS Giuseppe Garibaldi and these ships are tailored for AV-8A Harrier and AV-8B Harrier II).Why in the hell would iran need an aircraft carrier?,that makes no sense militarily,not to mention that before that iran would need to build a modern destroyer which is something that the navy does badly need right now not an aircraft carrier perhaps 20+ years from now.
Unfortunately, an aircraft carrier can move faster than a duck.

Does it need to be?Is an AC faster than an Anti-AC missiles? If you can't reply with logic then please don't quote me with arrogance.
Chuckle (good one)Hopefully it would be as good as the Qaher 313 stealth fighter.
Old but good air force/Iranian air force is almost non existent now .
We want to produce fighters within Iran , if Russia agrees with TOT, that will be a great shift to our technological capabilities, if not, to hell. We will produce them with higher cost of cash and time.i think , first they should buy some decent aircrafts for their AF .as far s Aircraft carrier is concerned
Huh, go thank God Russia exists, if you believe in. Both India and China are using their technology for ACs.Iran building a aircraft carrier in few years time is as good as believing the earth is cube.
bro please search about what you want so say and then say themI know right. If he thinks that my argument is scientifically wrong, he just could show their aerial factories, plane production lines, fyber-carbon technologies etc and show that i am wrong,
instead of uses his racial insult on one person he doesnt even knowreally strange
I know right. If he thinks that my argument is scientifically wrong, he just could show their aerial factories, plane production lines, fyber-carbon technologies etc and show that i am wrong,
instead of uses his racial insult on one person he doesnt even knowreally strange
Iran's panha 14 seats iranian heli in producing stagesI know right. If he thinks that my argument is scientifically wrong, he just could show their aerial factories, plane production lines, fyber-carbon technologies etc and show that i am wrong,
instead of uses his racial insult on one person he doesnt even knowreally strange
I know right. If he thinks that my argument is scientifically wrong, he just could show their aerial factories, plane production lines, fyber-carbon technologies etc and show that i am wrong,
instead of uses his racial insult on one person he doesnt even knowreally strange
Finally one civilised answer with photos instead of racial insults! I really appreciate this brosome pictures of Iran's fyber_carbon factory
![]()
adn dont forget power of Iran in making of heavy shipsI know right. If he thinks that my argument is scientifically wrong, he just could show their aerial factories, plane production lines, fyber-carbon technologies etc and show that i am wrong,
instead of uses his racial insult on one person he doesnt even knowreally strange