It's more like a stalemate for both sides. In the Middle East, however, many people consider a statement against Israel to be a victory. Hezbollah wasn't expecting a full war and Israel rushed into a wide spread air and ground campaign. Hezbollah was underdog and needed to step up to the plate after their assessments of no Israeli ground op turned out to be wrong. They did step up to the plate and made Israel pay a price. Israel on other hand sought to damage Lebanon's infrastructure severely and nothing could stop that. Hezbollah lacked air defense and offensive firepower.
Nowadays they have offensive firepower and their proposed solution to destructive Israeli strikes against Lebanon's infrastructure in future war is to invade northern Israel. As well as use precision missiles against Israeli infrastructure. I believe them that they can do temporary invasion of Northern Israel. I do not know what is up with their air defense and if Syria will assist them in such a future conflict. As Syrian AA can target Israeli jets over Lebanese airspace. I do not know if those precision missiles can actually overcome Israeli defense missile systems.
The only way an conflict will erupt is if US and allies do attack Iran in future. Hezbollah will want to go on offensive immediately. Israel has sufficient air force to deal with Syria and Lebanon at the same time. Especially since US forces are still based in Syria. If Iranian forces and/or other militias in Syria get involved , they will likely come under attack by US Air Force. Assuming it is a regional war. Then the question is will Russia tolerate US strikes around the Damascus area, and if they coordinate with the US then Hezbollah will be at an disadvantage. Israel has a really big Air Force and has more than enough firepower to deal with multiple scenarios.
Iran might try firing at Israel too, but we really don't know enough about their capabilities. It is a war that all sides want to avoid because of new complexities/tensions in region. Back in 2006 it was a 1v1 scenario, in 2019 that will not be the case.
...
...
...
...
To add more, so if Iran does enrich 20% within 2 months, it's likely US and allies will consult and try forming some sort of coalition. If there really is a war, then everything I said will happen. And how Russia will deal with scenario is a big deal. What kind of limited steps can they take. And also for the US, maybe they will just let Israel conduct strikes in Syria and try to keep Syria status quo as it is. Syria will make matters more complex. Israeli public will not stomach war of attrition well, especially if it is actually deadly for them. They aren't the Israeli's of 1973. They really on technological gaps and overwhelming firepower. Shia's(with exception of Iran and maybe Houthi's) in region cannot take war of attrition well either. Especially if Russia abandons them in event of regional war. Sunni axis is least prepared for such regional war and it will be ugly for them in the beginning. Some Arab regimes may collapse. Regular Sunni's will step in unconstrained by regimes. Sunnis will be in control of North Africa, all of Hejaz, Syria and Israel by the end of any such war as they can handle factors of war of attrition the best. Iraq and Iran will be left alone.
Nowadays they have offensive firepower and their proposed solution to destructive Israeli strikes against Lebanon's infrastructure in future war is to invade northern Israel. As well as use precision missiles against Israeli infrastructure. I believe them that they can do temporary invasion of Northern Israel. I do not know what is up with their air defense and if Syria will assist them in such a future conflict. As Syrian AA can target Israeli jets over Lebanese airspace. I do not know if those precision missiles can actually overcome Israeli defense missile systems.
The only way an conflict will erupt is if US and allies do attack Iran in future. Hezbollah will want to go on offensive immediately. Israel has sufficient air force to deal with Syria and Lebanon at the same time. Especially since US forces are still based in Syria. If Iranian forces and/or other militias in Syria get involved , they will likely come under attack by US Air Force. Assuming it is a regional war. Then the question is will Russia tolerate US strikes around the Damascus area, and if they coordinate with the US then Hezbollah will be at an disadvantage. Israel has a really big Air Force and has more than enough firepower to deal with multiple scenarios.
Iran might try firing at Israel too, but we really don't know enough about their capabilities. It is a war that all sides want to avoid because of new complexities/tensions in region. Back in 2006 it was a 1v1 scenario, in 2019 that will not be the case.
...
...
...
...
To add more, so if Iran does enrich 20% within 2 months, it's likely US and allies will consult and try forming some sort of coalition. If there really is a war, then everything I said will happen. And how Russia will deal with scenario is a big deal. What kind of limited steps can they take. And also for the US, maybe they will just let Israel conduct strikes in Syria and try to keep Syria status quo as it is. Syria will make matters more complex. Israeli public will not stomach war of attrition well, especially if it is actually deadly for them. They aren't the Israeli's of 1973. They really on technological gaps and overwhelming firepower. Shia's(with exception of Iran and maybe Houthi's) in region cannot take war of attrition well either. Especially if Russia abandons them in event of regional war. Sunni axis is least prepared for such regional war and it will be ugly for them in the beginning. Some Arab regimes may collapse. Regular Sunni's will step in unconstrained by regimes. Sunnis will be in control of North Africa, all of Hejaz, Syria and Israel by the end of any such war as they can handle factors of war of attrition the best. Iraq and Iran will be left alone.
i was watching live 