What's new

Iran air force Shahed 129 recon plane looking for Qaede in northern Hama province

Considering distance btw two guided missiles as .5 meter total wingspan of flying S-129 in the clips is at least 14 meters to be more accurate it's some how .6 m which makes wingspan 16 meters ...

2.jpg
 
claimed its the S-300 !? :lol:

Who told you that ? these mockups paraded as B-373 project ...
https://theaviationist.com/2014/01/21/iran-s-300-saga/

https://www.defensetech.org/2010/04/19/iranian-s-300-sams-or-a-bunch-of-oil-drums-welded-together/

This
Iranian-S-300-SAM.jpg


Seems to be a copy of this:
Russian-S-300-SAMs-on-Parade.jpg

and not this:
upload_2017-3-18_18-53-28-png.384810


In the real combat we will see if your state of the fart david's sling is really able to targer a dancing warhead !!!

You can call iranian systems junk or plastic as much as you like !

Yes, those pictures are totally showing your air defense hitting something!
It does the role of a ballistic missile better than what its supposed to be now
 
Nah, that's a full working SAM,

Better than anything you have

Yeah ... in propaganda videos !

https://theaviationist.com/2014/01/21/iran-s-300-saga/

https://www.defensetech.org/2010/04/19/iranian-s-300-sams-or-a-bunch-of-oil-drums-welded-together/

This
Iranian-S-300-SAM.jpg


Seems to be a copy of this:
Russian-S-300-SAMs-on-Parade.jpg

and not this:
upload_2017-3-18_18-53-28-png.384810



Yes, those pictures are totally showing your air defense hitting something!
It does the role of a ballistic missile better than what its supposed to be now

We changed the design from a cold launch system to a hot launch system !

So nobody can call it russian or a copy of S-300 ...

It does the role of a ballistic missile better than what its supposed to be now

Same with your state of the fart david's sling when it fails to target the incoming warhead !

I didn't say you didn't capture this, I said this aircraft couldn't remain intact from a high altitude fall

Yes ... we told him to land on his own will ... win win situation ! :D

Let me show you some other screenshots ... so healthy people can judge it themselves !

upload_2017-4-13_2-52-45.png upload_2017-4-13_2-53-38.png upload_2017-4-13_2-54-28.png upload_2017-4-13_2-54-51.png upload_2017-4-13_2-55-5.png upload_2017-4-13_2-55-21.png upload_2017-4-13_2-56-17.png upload_2017-4-13_2-56-33.png upload_2017-4-13_2-57-6.png upload_2017-4-13_2-57-58.png upload_2017-4-13_2-58-11.png upload_2017-4-13_2-58-40.png
 
Yeah ... in propaganda videos !
I showed you thermal and slow motion footage of our air defense hitting a target missile that is better than your best ballistic missile, the Silver Sparrow

Yeah ... in propaganda videos !



We changed the design from a cold launch system to a hot launch system !

So nobody can call it russian or a copy of S-300 ...



Same with your state of the fart david's sling when it fails to target the incoming warhead !



Yes ... we told him to land on his own will ... win win situation ! :D

Let me show you some other screenshots ... so healthy people can judge it themselves !

View attachment 390399 View attachment 390400 View attachment 390401 View attachment 390402 View attachment 390403 View attachment 390404 View attachment 390405 View attachment 390406 View attachment 390407 View attachment 390408 View attachment 390409 View attachment 390410
Never said the Bavar 373 was a copy of the S-300, but its just as useless as the S-300, but it certainty is based on some extent on your older air to air missiles

By the way, our David's Sling would be awful as a ballistic missile, its a kinetic missile, no warhead!
That allows our missile to have more range, less weight, be faster and more maneuverable, there is more probability for an asteroid to land on your house than the David's Sling failing (Although it is possible)

Your drones are just some low quality, short range, low capacity and altitude garbage. Do you even have satellites to control them or you are using line of sight control?
 
Never said the Bavar 373 was a copy of the S-300, but its just as useless as the S-300, but it certainty is based on some extent on your older air to air missiles

By the way, our David's Sling would be awful as a ballistic missile, its a kinetic missile, no warhead!
That allows our missile to have more range, less weight, be faster and more maneuverable, there is more probability for an asteroid to land on your house than the David's Sling failing (Although it is possible)

Your drones are just some low quality, short range, low capacity and altitude garbage. Do you even have satellites to control them or you are using line of sight control?

Who cares what a fanboy thinks ?
 
Journalism failure ...

So what ... you made your so called David's sling state of the fart joke to protect israel from hamas rockets !?



Let's ask russian opinion !

@vostok
@ptldM3
@Navigator


This @Beny Karachun is a troll that has been banned many times. He knows nothing about anything and losses every argument he jumps into.


For instance he claimed the S-400 and S-300 failed in Syria yet even the US stated that Russia never even bothered activating the radars on those systems let alone taking any hostile action.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile...8/us/politics/us-islamic-state-syria.amp.html


So far, the Russian military does not appear to have taken any threatening actions, such as directing its battlefield radar or air defense systems to confront the Americans United States officials said.


So again he has egg on his face. The Russians never even activated their radars because the US was hoping to gather intelligence on those air defense systems by deploying ELINT aircraft.



He claims that the S-400 and S-300 can't even shoot down a Tomahawk which is about 20 feet in length, yet even a Pantsir can shoot down a target drone which is less then 9 feet in length.


Here is a target 1/3rd the size of a tomahawk being destroyed.

IMG_3183.PNG



Wreckage:

IMG_3186.PNG




E95 falling to earth after being hit:

IMG_3189.PNG



Here is what was destroyed:

IMG_3191.PNG






Half of Israeli scientists are Russian or some other foreigners. Israel gets a lot of technology from the US and what it can't get it just commits theft by stealing technology.
 
Last edited:
This @Beny Karachun is a troll that has been banned many times. He knows nothing about anything and losses every argument he jumps into.


For instance he claimed the S-400 and S-300 failed in Syria yet even the US stated that Russia never even bothered activating the radars on those systems let alone taking any hostile action.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile...8/us/politics/us-islamic-state-syria.amp.html


So far, the Russian military does not appear to have taken any threatening actions, such as directing its battlefield radar or air defense systems to confront the Americans


So again he has egg on his face. The Russians never even activated their radars because the US was hoping to gather intelligence on those air defense systems by deploying ELINT aircraft.



He claims that the S-400 and S-300 can even shoot down a Tomahawk which is about 20 feet in length, yet even a Pantsir can shoot down a target drone which is less then 9 feet in length.


Here is a target 1/3rd the size of a tomahawk being destroyed.

View attachment 390414



Wrecking:

View attachment 390415



E95 falling to earth after being hit:

View attachment 390416


Here is what was destroyed:

View attachment 390417





Half of Israeli scientists are Russian or some other foreigners. Israel gets a lot of technology from the US and what it can't get it just commits theft by stealing technology.
The Russian radars are always activated, if they were not they would be vulnerable to any attack

What happened to the claims such as "Any attack on Assad will result in Russian response" and such?
Also, this happened today:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...se-Falitah-barrens-Hezbollah-Syrian-Arab-Army

Yes, but this is a Pantsir, not S-300 or S-400, it uses airburst cannons, not a missile system, you're talking as if Israel and other western nations don't have similar systems
http://www.imisystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SUPER-VULCAN.pdf

By the way, this target didn't fly low like the Tommahawks do, easy target for any air defense

And yes, many scientists in Israel are Russian, but they are Jews, not ethnically Russian, hell even I am part Russian
 
I showed you thermal and slow motion footage of our air defense hitting a target missile that is better than your best ballistic missile, the Silver Sparrow


Never said the Bavar 373 was a copy of the S-300, but its just as useless as the S-300, but it certainty is based on some extent on your older air to air missiles

By the way, our David's Sling would be awful as a ballistic missile, its a kinetic missile, no warhead!
That allows our missile to have more range, less weight, be faster and more maneuverable, there is more probability for an asteroid to land on your house than the David's Sling failing (Although it is possible)

Your drones are just some low quality, short range, low capacity and altitude garbage. Do you even have satellites to control them or you are using line of sight control?


That's cute but Israel could not even intercept crude rockets fired into Israel from Egypt recently.

Israel fired on a drone with both Patriot missiles and fighters and could not shoot it down :lol:

That Sparow also looks like a cheap V-2 mockup. God only knows how much industrial theft Israeli committed to built that cheap looking missile.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom