What's new

India's Orwellian drift

Now that its clear, we are talking to a mumbai terrorist attacks truther, I request people to stop and save themselves that headbutting a wall feeling.

You can't fight truthiness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness

Claiming the people who were insistent that Iraq had WMD's, and Raymond Davis was a diplomat. Don't go there & stop trolling, I'm telling you again, it will derail this thread.
 
Pakistani citizens were killed. Pakistan has every right to ask for the Hindutva terrorists that killed Pakistani citizens.
The train blast had happened in India. In other words the place of incidence is India. This gives India the right to prosecute the perpetrators. Pakistan can, at best, request for information, but can never demand for the perpetrators to be handed over to them. Forget about prosecuting them.
 
Pakistan can demand the perpetrators to be handed to them, just like the US demanded from Pakistan Afia Sidiqi who allegedly attacked American soldiers in Afghanistan. India has also asked for the alleged Pakistani perpetrators to be handed over involved in activities in the disputed territory of J&K.
 
Pakistan can demand the perpetrators to be handed to them, just like the US demanded from Pakistan Afia Sidiqi who allegedly attacked American soldiers in Afghanistan.
Aha! That famous Pakistani sense of entitlement.

Like it or not, Aafia Siddiqui is a case of your govt. bending over backwards to meet Amreeki demand, bypassing sovereign law.

And no, you can't demand. I mean yes, sure you can demand. India is not obliged by law to meet your demands.
 
Which like under Indian control, hence Indian jurisdiction. Which part of legal jusrisdiction do you not understand?

But it's not Indian territory, is it? Just like Azad Kashmir is not under the Pakistani government control, it is an autonomous region with separate governance.
 
Aha! That famous Pakistani sense of entitlement.

Like it or not, Aafia Siddiqui is a case of your govt. bending over backwards to meet Amreeki demand, bypassing sovereign law.

And no, you can't demand. I mean yes, sure you can demand. India is not obliged by law to meet your demands.

Pakistan did not bend over to meet the demand of Raymond Davis's release. However, India did bend over a few times to America when they demanded the release of the American responsible for the Madhya Pradesh Bhopal industrial incident, and released them unconditionally. Read Post # 144. India also bent over when the CIA agent David Headley was exposed for his role in the Mumbai attacks.
 
But it's not Indian territory, is it? Just like Azad Kashmir is not under the Pakistani government control, it is an autonomous region with a separate governance.

:hitwall: :hitwall:

Both India and Pakistan CLAIM the entire J&K as their territory. But what matters is which territory is under whose control.

Hence when a crime happens in Indian held J&K, Indian courts have jurisdiction over that. When a crime takes place in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, you guys have jurisdiction over that.

It's not that complicated a system to grasp yaar.
 
Bhopal Disaster:

UCC Chairman and CEO Warren Anderson was arrested & released on bail by the Madhya Pradesh Police in Bhopal on December 7, 1984. The arrest, which took place at the airport, ensured Anderson would meet no harm by the Bhopal community. Anderson was taken to UCC's house after which he was released six hours later on $2,100 bail and flown out on a government plane. In 1987, the Indian government summoned Anderson, eight other executives and two company affiliates with homicide charges to appear in Indian court. Union Carbide balked, saying the company is not under Indian jurisdiction.

In 1991, local Bhopal authorities charged Anderson, who had retired in 1986, with manslaughter, a crime that carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. He was declared a fugitive from justice by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhopal on February 1, 1992, for failing to appear at the court hearings in a culpable homicide case in which he was named the chief defendant. Orders were passed to the Government of India to press for an extradition from the United States.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the decision of the lower federal courts in October 1993, meaning that victims of the Bhopal disaster could not seek damages in a US court.

Source: Wikipedia
 
Both India and Pakistan CLAIM the entire J&K as their territory. But what matters is which territory is under whose control.

Pakistan doesn't claim J&K as its territory, it says that J&K is disputed territory, in perfect accordance with the UN mandate. India doesn't clearly have the same opinion.
 
yes, i agree that the thread has been diverted by trolls that started talking about pakistan & its affairs.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom