What's new

India’s Middle East Policy Gathers Momentum

Aarush

FULL MEMBER
Jan 27, 2014
1,174
-1
2,718
Country
India
Location
United States
Much of India’s foreign policy, even today, is based on the fundamentals laid down by the country’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. India’s place in the world and the policies that have shaped its global personality as a nation are based on Nehru’s ideals, which were sacrosanct until the Indo-China war of 1962 offered a perspective based on realism, rather than idealism.

Nehru was genuinely fond of driving India’s foreign policy, just like Manmohan Singh and now Narendra Modi have been. However, Nehru’s play in extending India’s hand of friendship and cooperation in the Middle East and Persian Gulf (more commonly known in India as West Asia) was a masterstroke, the benefits of which India reaps in the region even today.

India’s influence post-independence in the region started with the rapport that Nehru ended up building with the former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser. By 1953, eminent Indian diplomat V. K. Krishna Menon had already started to market the idea of a Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) at the United Nations. Nehru, Gamel, and others from Asia and Europe later championed the NAM, at the time a revolution, but now an idea well past its expiry date.

Nehru made Cairo a single-point policy in West Asia, though which New Delhi over the years developed exposure to the various intricacies of the region. Even though trade between Egypt and India never flourished to the levels that both Nasser and Nehru had hoped for, the Nehru-Nasser dynamic did lay much of the groundwork for India’s policy of strategically backing Arab states. Even after Nasser died in 1970, India supported his successor President Anwar Sadat’s regime as it partnered with Hafez al-Assad’s Syria and took on the Israelis in the October War (Yom Kippur War).

Continuing the trend, India also maintained good relations with Hafez al-Assad’s Ba’athist regime in Damascus. These ties were retained when his son, Bashar al-Assad, took over the presidency of Syria in 2000. India has maintained a sly preference for the Assad regime even during the current Syrian Civil War, echoing the Russian line of supporting only an amicable solution via talks. In addition to taking part in the Geneva II talks, New Delhi sent a business delegation to Syria last May to bolster trade ties.

India’s traditional rules of engagement with West Asia have only expanded in the decades following Nehru. This has been mostly positive for India, barring some instances that may be called blunders, such as India’s stance on Saddam Hussein’s Iraq during the first Gulf War, when it became the only country to shift its High Commission from Kuwait to Basra in Iraq after Saddam invaded.

Fast-forward to the new millennia, and India’s political relationship with West Asian and Persian Gulf states is more streamlined, clear and concise. While much of the diplomatic attention has focused on the 7 million Indians working in the region, and the remittances they send back home, as well as on the oil trade, bilateral relations are also becoming more serious on the security front.

India already has two main working security understandings in the region, namely with Saudi Arabia and Qatar. While details of India’s strategic understanding with Riyadh remain largely unknown, New Delhi signed an expansive defense agreement with Doha in 2008, thought to be a “one of a kind,” not signed with any other country since. Under the agreement, New Delhi has committed to protect Qatar’s assets and interests from external threats.

The proactive policy towards West Asia has continued under the new government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has giving Indian foreign policy in general a much needed boost.

The timing is good, as West Asia is now becoming more important for India, particularly in terms of security. The ongoing crisis surrounding the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) has driven recent Indian engagement. National Security Advisor Ajit Doval visited Doha last month to hold talks with the Qatari leadership.

India has leveraged its special understanding with Qatar in Iraq and reportedly even in Afghanistan. New Delhi had sought help of the influential Qatari state to locate 39 missing construction workers who have been taken hostage by ISIS. Meanwhile, a recent report also credited Doha for playing the role of mediator in the release of Indian citizen Father Alexis Prem Kumar, who was abducted by the Taliban eight months ago in Afghanistan’s Herat province where he had been helping to educate refugee children.

Qatar, a small Gulf country renowned for its wealth and for punching politically above its weight in the region, has become a formidable ally for India. Doha has some control over crucial entities in the region, including those fighting ISIS, such as the al-Qaeda affiliate Nusra Front. Qatar is now reportedly moving to dismantle Nusra’s relations with al-Qaeda (although denied by Nusra’s second in command, Abu Mariya), which may give Doha more ground influence in the fragile realpolitik taking place in Iraq and Syria. This offers context on the role Doha can play in India’s worries relating to the launch of al-Qaeda in South Asia (AQSA) in September last year, as announced by the terror organization’s chief Ayman al-Zawahiri.

India is now looking to form more bilateral security arrangements with its friends in the region. After Qatar and Saudi Arabia, Bahrain has become the latest country to enter into negotiations with New Delhi on a memorandum of understanding that will cover defense cooperation between the two countries. Delhi and Manama have always shared close ties, with some even suggesting that Bahrain is India’s closest ally in the region. Other states such as the UAE are also strengthening ties with India; the fact that Dubai deported Indian mujahideen leaders to India in 2013 showcased growing West Asian cooperation on security issues with India.

With organizations such as ISIS able to influence people across borders and continents using online propaganda, West Asia will remain a diplomatic focus for India.

India’s Middle East Policy Gathers Momentum | The Diplomat
 
We enjoy such a close relationship with gulf countries so much so that India would intervene militarily for Qatar....so its time to get a permanent membership in OIC.
 
Overall Indian diplomatic Position in Middle East is of DWARF because other then Israel they dont have noteworthy Relations with any other Middle Eastern Country.
 
Overall Indian diplomatic Position in Middle East is of DWARF because other then Israel they dont have noteworthy Relations with any other Middle Eastern Country.

mate, read the article. india have a good diplomatic relation with UAE, SA and Qatar.. the good relation with ME country save many indians from ISIS and Taliban.

off topic:- pakistan don't have any relation with any country in the level of indo- israel or indo-russian relation.
 
mate, read the article. india have a good diplomatic relation with UAE, SA and Qatar.. the good relation with ME country save many indians from ISIS and Taliban.

off topic:- pakistan don't have any relation with any country in the level of indo- israel or indo-russian relation.
There is a big Difference between DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS and STRATEGIC RELATIONS. Having Diplomatic Relations in Current time is not enough its just confined to Exchange of Diplomats and some Greetings but when Strategic Relations involved then it goes to whole new level where countries involve in lot of Shared Program and in some occasion Military as well.

As far as Saving Indians from ISIS and Taliban is concerned then any Country would do everything they could to save their Citizens but the EXTENT matters as well because Pakistan's Army is Stationed in Saudia Arabia as well as Qatar and Qatar support causes lot tensions with Iran and Pakistan in the past few years when their was Political Instability there.
 
There is a big Difference between DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS and STRATEGIC RELATIONS. Having Diplomatic Relations in Current time is not enough its just confined to Exchange of Diplomats and some Greetings but when Strategic Relations involved then it goes to whole new level where countries involve in lot of Shared Program and in some occasion Military as well.

As far as Saving Indians from ISIS and Taliban is concerned then any Country would do everything they could to save their Citizens but the EXTENT matters as well because Pakistan's Army is Stationed in Saudia Arabia as well as Qatar and Qatar support causes lot tensions with Iran and Pakistan in the past few years when their was Political Instability there.

We have strategic relations with Saudi Arabia, Qatar & excellent relationship with Egypt, Iraq, Syria & with Oman we have very special Relationship. They give us excellent Trade preference, intel share, good business, what do we more want ?
 
Overall Indian diplomatic Position in Middle East is of DWARF because other then Israel they dont have noteworthy Relations with any other Middle Eastern Country.

Dude read that article .Tommorrow if any one try to attack Qatar we will intervene .Cost wouldnt be a problem.Means even if that is Israel we wont hesitate .That is deal we signed with them in 2008.But Qatar has large influence and huge connections with US and others.
Middle east is a special case to us because we have 7 million Indians in there .FYI Israel need us more than vice versa .
Because we have a lot of marketsfor military technology in this World.
 
We have strategic relations with Saudi Arabia, Qatar & excellent relationship with Egypt, Iraq, Syria & with Oman we have very special Relationship. They give us excellent Trade preference, intel share, good business, what do we more want ?
Dont know about Egypt and Syria but it was Pakistanis who have their Forces Deployed in Qatar and Saudia Arabia while Iraq is uding our Super Mushak Trainers for training their Pilots and were in negotiation for JF17 Aircraft as well. The only relations that I know of India with Middle Eastern Countries have been Trade and Human Resource other then that I never heard of Strategic Relations.

Dude read that article .Tommorrow if any one try to attack Qatar we will intervene .Cost wouldnt be a problem.Means even if that is Israel we wont hesitate .That is deal we signed with them in 2008.But Qatar has large influence and huge connections with US and others.
Middle east is a special case to us because we have 7 million Indians in there .FYI Israel need us more than vice versa .
Because we have a lot of marketsfor military technology in this World.
I think you must be watching Bollywood Movies a lot especially that movie BABY but reality is quite Different and especially for Qatar because last time it was Pakistan who was accused of supporting Qatar Regime to curb down Protest and that Accusation came from Iran and that to in 2008 when Protest break out in Qatar.

FYI The only threat Qatar has from any country is from Iran and seeing Indian relations with Iran I dont think Qataris would put their Bet on Indians to defend them instead it would always be USA and NATO and maybe Pakistan who would asked to Station their Troops because of our support to Gulf Countries relations with Iran is Strained as well since 2008.

As for Oman 47%of their Population are called Al-Balushi and they are Baluch from Pakistani coastal Areas called Makranis and unlike Baluch from Kalat areas they are Comfortable with Pakistan and we havent face any problems in Separatist Threat in Baluchistan Coastal Areas. They make huge chunk of Oman's Military as well.
 
Dont know about Egypt and Syria but it was Pakistanis who have their Forces Deployed in Qatar and Saudia Arabia while Iraq is uding our Super Mushak Trainers for training their Pilots and were in negotiation for JF17 Aircraft as well. The only relations that I know of India with Middle Eastern Countries have been Trade and Human Resource other then that I never heard of Strategic Relations.

I think you must be watching Bollywood Movies a lot especially that movie BABY but reality is quite Different and especially for Qatar because last time it was Pakistan who was accused of supporting Qatar Regime to curb down Protest and that Accusation came from Iran and that to in 2008 when Protest break out in Qatar.

FYI The only threat Qatar has from any country is from Iran and seeing Indian relations with Iran I dont think Qataris would put their Bet on Indians to defend them instead it would always be USA and NATO and maybe Pakistan who would asked to Station their Troops because of our support to Gulf Countries relations with Iran is Strained as well since 2008.

As for Oman 47%of their Population are called Al-Balushi and they are Baluch from Pakistani coastal Areas called Makranis and unlike Baluch from Kalat areas they are Comfortable with Pakistan and we havent face any problems in Separatist Threat in Baluchistan Coastal Areas. They make huge chunk of Oman's Military as well.


You dont need offended with that news .But we have already signed that deal with Qatar ,during 2008.According to that deal we willprotect their national assets at any cost.
Iran wont challenge Qatar .They are also a known ally of US.And they are looking for an excuse

Middle east will remain as important to us in near future .Both for oil and for trade.Around 7 million Indians also in there
Pakistan and their engagement with Middle East is not issue in this thread .Since that is not the subject in here.We dont care about your so called relation with Oman Neithey we ask you to explain it.

But you can check the google if you want.We have full fledged strategic agreement with Qatar.And if tommorrow if theyare in danger we will send our military to help them .After all that was the deal withthem.

Dont know about Egypt and Syria but it was Pakistanis who have their Forces Deployed in Qatar and Saudia Arabia while Iraq is uding our Super Mushak Trainers for training their Pilots and were in negotiation for JF17 Aircraft as well. The only relations that I know of India with Middle Eastern Countries have been Trade and Human Resource other then that I never heard of Strategic Relations.

I think you must be watching Bollywood Movies a lot especially that movie BABY but reality is quite Different and especially for Qatar because last time it was Pakistan who was accused of supporting Qatar Regime to curb down Protest and that Accusation came from Iran and that to in 2008 when Protest break out in Qatar.

FYI The only threat Qatar has from any country is from Iran and seeing Indian relations with Iran I dont think Qataris would put their Bet on Indians to defend them instead it would always be USA and NATO and maybe Pakistan who would asked to Station their Troops because of our support to Gulf Countries relations with Iran is Strained as well since 2008.

As for Oman 47%of their Population are called Al-Balushi and they are Baluch from Pakistani coastal Areas called Makranis and unlike Baluch from Kalat areas they are Comfortable with Pakistan and we havent face any problems in Separatist Threat in Baluchistan Coastal Areas. They make huge chunk of Oman's Military as well.


And Arabs also knows a lot about India and Pakistan.Who cares about your contribution to them.?We dont ask you to explain.For equipments they have US in there and they also have money .Sometimes they need soldiersfor hire .Perhaps that iswhy they asked your help .Sorry this deal is about the helping Qatar withour expeditionary forces from grave threat.
This is not bollywood this is real.
 
Dont know about Egypt and Syria but it was Pakistanis who have their Forces Deployed in Qatar and Saudia Arabia while Iraq is uding our Super Mushak Trainers for training their Pilots and were in negotiation for JF17 Aircraft as well. The only relations that I know of India with Middle Eastern Countries have been Trade and Human Resource other then that I never heard of Strategic Relations.
Security pact with Qatar gives India Gulf toehold - Indian Express
Bahrain–India relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
India–Iraq relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
India and Saudi Arabia Sign Defense Cooperation Pact | The Diplomat
 
We enjoy such a close relationship with gulf countries so much so that India would intervene militarily for Qatar....so its time to get a permanent membership in OIC.
RSS plans to make india a full hindu country by 2020,90 percent of indians on PDF constantly express their racist attitudes towards arabs for no reason. So why would you want a membership in OIC?
 
RSS plans to make india a full hindu country by 2020,90 percent of indians on PDF constantly express their racist attitudes towards arabs for no reason. So why would you want a membership in OIC?
There are 14% of Muslims in India.....around 180 million.....OIC can't realize its full potential without India.

1.Hindu nation is not official policy of govt


2.Majority of Indians are not racists

3.Majority of Muslim countries have good relationship.... and they support our stance to ba member of OIC
 
There are 14% of Muslims in India.....around 180 million.....OIC can't realize its full potential without India.

1.Hindu nation is not official policy of govt


2.Majority of Indians are not racists

3.Majority of Muslim countries have good relationship.... and they support our stance to ba member of OIC
Hmm Fair enough!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Back
Top Bottom