Indian state bans beef, introduces jail time for possession

[jamahir]

Are there helplines to call some federal investigation agency? We should hurry before he straps a bomb vest and blows himself in anger.

and what would that achieve ??

 

[Ajit Kumar]

please read my above post again.

I read. So I am going to vote for BJP again.

 

[jamahir]

Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh travelled this spring to the frontier with Bangladesh, calling on the Border Security Force (BSF) to halt cattle smuggling completely so that the "people of Bangladesh give up eating beef", media reported at the time.

so bjp is committing food terrorism now.

 

[21 Dec 2012]

and what would that achieve ??

Eh.............72 virgins

 

[Ajit Kumar]

So even non-Hindus are not allowed beef?

WTF

Yes. Non hindus are not allowed to eat beef.

Alcohol is not banned for Non-Muslims in Pakistan, neither is Pork.

So yea, it can be banned...i mean....paper secular republic of India at it again.

Alcohol is not holy in Islam. But cow is holy in Hinduism. So cow slaughter must be banned.

 

[jamahir]

Eh.............72 virgins

no thanks... i would rather do "love jihad" in the living world, for virgins and non-virgins.

---------------

@Donatello

i agree with you... i demand ban in india on alcohol and interest-based economics... it will have historic effect on india.

 

[21 Dec 2012]

no thanks... i would rather do "love jihad" in the living world, for virgins and non-virgins.

This is wierd. Who would have thought that I would be explaining Jihed to an Islamic fundamentalist some day.

 

[coffee_cup]

Pakistan is an Islamic republic, you can have separate rules for dietary preferences for each community. India cannot do that.

Make your argument about secularism more explicitly. How it is affected etc, etc & I will be glad to debate you.

So which means, India will have all the laws derived form Hinudism embedded in the constitution.

As Donatello wrote earlier, India is a "Paper Secular Republic".

There is nothing secular in India at all, especially after the take over of govt. by fanatic hindus.

 

[Hasbara Buster]

What kind of weird logic is that ? It certainly can't be banned only for any one group. If something is banned, it would be applicable for all.

I disagree, as far as I'm concerned all non-Muslims living in Muslim countries should be able to eat pork.

 

[jamahir]

This is wierd. Who would have thought that I would be explaining Jihed to an Islamic fundamentalist some day.

one must change with the times.

did you read my libya post and the rest of the post you just quoted ??

 

[Ajit Kumar]

no thanks... i would rather do "love jihad" in the living world, for virgins and non-virgins.

---------------

@Donatello

i agree with you... i demand ban in india on alcohol and interest-based economics... it will have historic effect on india.

Your demand is rejected. Ban on Beef is good.

 

[jamahir]

Your demand is rejected. Ban on Beef is good.

so you are proud of india's new title from last year - "suicide capital of the world" ??

 

[Koovie]

Welcome back to the dark ages!


Meanwhile thousands live in subhuman conditions in MH and the local government has nothing else to do?

Height of stupidity.

 

[Hindustani78]

it should, for below is how any citizen ( and by consequence, farmers ) in libyan jamahiriya lived...

1. any person interested in engaging in farming was given free land by the system, along with seeds, tools needed and housing, for free.

2. electricity and water was free ( that too in a largely desert country ), and libya had history's largest irrigation system, "the great man-made river" project ( gmrr ).

3. housing for any citizen was to be lived rent-free until the resident wished... rent was considered a compromise on the freedom of the citizen and therefore anti-human.

4. medical system was free, and if treatment was available outside, the costs would be borne by the system.

5. education system was free, and if that course was available outside, the costs would be borne by the system.

6. education was of one's choice and could not be forced by parents or circumstance.

7. food was at low cost.

8. any person interested in establishing a business was given a start-up amount of 20,000 dollars, interest-free.

9. all loans were interest-free.

10. no private banks operated in libya.

11. for a person not in employment, he or she was given the average salary ( stipend ) for the person's choice of field of employment... in fact, this was a coming-down in later years from the early days of the al-fatah revolution... in 1979, a unemployed person was given 7000 dollars per month !!

12. libyan jamahiriya being socialist, all wasteful traditions were frowned upon, like 600-guest four-day weddings like what happens in south asia.

13. at weddings, the bride and groom were together given 50,000 dollars to help them set up a new home etc.

14. car purchase was subsidized by the system.

----------

so tell me, why would any farmer suicide in libyan jamahiriya, when his material needs had been taken care by the system, leaving him spiritually at ease ??

Why you always forget the ratio of Population ?

Republic of India in every aspect is different because its having a young population, natural resources, man power , technology, good irrigation system, space and Nuclear technology.

Republic of India can provide everything to its citizens.

 

[Manindra]

I disagree, as far as I'm concerned all non-Muslims living in Muslim countries should be able to eat pork.

Beef is not banned in India only slaughter houses in a particular state.
Cow slaughter is highly emotional matter for Hindus & some rightwing parties able to getting them banned with reaping this issue.
More than 30% of India is pure vegetarian & in non-vegetarian one regular meat consumption is very low.
Even in Non-Vegetarian hindus didn't eat pork (except in southern states) & in many states & city Alcohol are already banned.
So, personal freedom is precious but I am also not support to kill anyone for food.
So, neither I oppose this move & neither support (if they uplift ban on slaughter).

 

[Ajit Kumar]

So which means, India will have all the laws derived form Hinudism embedded in the constitution.

As Donatello wrote earlier, India is a "Paper Secular Republic".

There is nothing secular in India at all, especially after the take over of govt. by fanatic hindus.

Yes. There should not be any secular laws to communal people who always use religion for violence.