indiatester
SENIOR MEMBER
At least we're not retard as to copy 1950s techfor modern defense regardless if we can sell our weapons or not.
You are retarded enough to troll for no reason. So....

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At least we're not retard as to copy 1950s techfor modern defense regardless if we can sell our weapons or not.

If this is clone then your J10 program is rip of copy of Israel Levi project![]()



You are retarded enough to troll for no reason. So....![]()

Even if J-10 proven to be a clome of Lavi, at least we cloned the 1990 tech and our cloning time is 2003 which 10 to 15 years but not as retard as Akash to clone an half century old SA-6 technology.
What'zzzz matter too painfull to swallow the reality![]()
How shamelessly accepting that you clone that technology cause your country is doing it from long sorry. but sorry we are not that much shameless, may be airframe looks same but design is totally different for Akash.
, cloning an half century old tech is indeed a glory for Indians. And same can be said with our J-11 and other stuffs, the airframe might be the same but the design is totally difference
..but we're not as retard as to clone the half century museum antique as Akash
.This thread is about Akash ...... I don't understand why Indians are replying to that retard who is bringing off-topic comments .
, Mr. do more talk less
Please dnt bring your third quality junk into discussion no one want that, just sell Russian MIG21 ohh J7 to other countries cause only that you can sell not your third quality junk.
and as matter of fact we have sold alot of these J-7 toys to other countries
Yes it is indeed painful. All my Chinese friends are smart. When I find one like you, I do feel sorry.
But please do clarify, why you had to troll?
.At least we're not retard as to copy 1950s techfor modern defense regardless if we can sell our weapons or not.
Indian talk about the shame, cloning an half century old tech is indeed a glory for Indians. And same can be said with our J-11 and other stuffs, the airframe is the same but the design is totally difference
..but we're not as retard as to clone the half century museum antique as Akash
.

Enjoy.I'm not trolling but return favor to some Indians trollers for making fun of our products when Indians couldn't even make a proper copy of modern product but an more than half century old SA-6.
While Chinese was doing copy-paste or reverse engineering whole world was criticizing them like hell and now china is independent and superpower. We got late and just received the message of "It doesn't matter whether a cat is white or black, as long as it catches mice." and so far we have achieved well enough. It will take around 15-20 years max to achieve the league, till then what matters if its of 1950 or 60's, it should just work what it means for.
And same can be said with our Akash, the airframe is the same but the internal design is totally different
Xian H-6![]()

it really doesn't matter if you guys like to copy & past the 50s tech but criticize and mock China while you guys are doing the same with Akash will only make yourself look bad.
i
H-6K is stand off cruise missiles carrier as the updated American B-52 role, it has a total different role as 1960's H-6 which directly flying a bombarmment mission and beside we've makde our copy of Tu-16 since 1970s but your Akash is developped from a 50 years old SA-6, you could have reverse engineering of S-300 or other more sophisticated SAM, I guess there must be a rational explaination why you guys didn't do it or couldn't do it.![]()
well but 50 year SAM , still can take our your 22nd century planes.....lol ... BTW , let me educated chinese friend who are so dumb, its radar / Avionics / programming , that all make the difference.
so this 50 year so called Aakash is also design to target your cruse missiles. lol so go and sleep .
..but design a total new sophisticate vertical tube lauch S300 to S-500 family ?...are you saying the original creator of SA-6 are also dumbs as Chineses
. You can't simply admit that either that you Indians don't have the gut to copy new SAM or incapable to do so. 

lol ... i don't know ... when India rejected Su-27 planes and build MK-30 MKI for itself , why Chinese bought inferior Su-27 ???If SA-6 was so good as you claim to be why Russian didn't do the same just by upgrading radar / Avionics / programming..but design a total new sophisticate vertical tube lauch S300 to S-500 family ?...are you saying the original creator of SA-6 are also dumbs as Chineses
. You can't simply admit that either that you Indians don't have the gut to copy new SAM or incapable to do so.
And if you Indians are happy to operate an cloning version 50 years old SA-6 ....is that a problem for us?![]()
>Pakistan missile is superior to Indian missile ,well I will not drag this again.